When you break down the lives of extremely successful people, you find that their success didn't come from an earth shattering break-through.

Rather, it came from obsessing about a simple idea, fanatically.

Time for a thread about one such idea. 👇👇👇
1/ During world war II, a eleven year old kid checks out a book from the nearest library. The book's title was "1000 ways to make 1000 dollars".

After he reads that book, he makes a statement that by the time he was 35 years old, he'd be a millionaire.
2/ By the age of 35, his net worth was roughly 7-8 million dollars. The library was Omaha public library. That kid was Warren Buffett.

How he got there is an interesting story.

As soon as he reads that book, he decides he should have 1000 dollars before he finishes school.
3/ While looking for business ideas, he goes to his friend Dan's house one day.

He watches Dan fix an old pinball machine (that he bought for $15) in two hours.

Warren asks him if he can fix more.

Dan says yes.
4/ Warren and Dan set up a company (of course no incorporation and all that legal jazz).

They call the firm "Wilson Coin Operated Company".

They go to local barbers and pitch the barbers an ingenious business plan.
5/ The Plan:

The barber has to let the company install a fixed up pinball machine in a corner of the barber shop.

Every week, whatever money gets collected in the pinball machine, they'd share it 50-50.

Out of the 50% share, Warren and Dan shared 50-50.
6/ They invest $15-20 in fixing up a machine, and in the very first week Warren finds at least $5 in the machines.

They make $2.5 from that machine per week.

That's $10 a month ; $120 a year.

They installed ~25 such machines across Omaha in barber shops.
7/ They also come across a damaged $200 Rolls Royce that Dan fixes up with an extra $200 investment.

Then, they start renting out the Rolls Royce for weddings during weekends, at $100 per weekend.

The ROC was through the roof.
8/ Running few many businesses this way, Warren ends up saving over $9000 when he finishes high school.

This was way past his $1000 goal.

At age 17, he wanted a framework to compound this capital and get to $1m by age 35.

Let's take a slight detour to 1626 Manhattan now.
9/ In 1626, the Native Indians tasked their chief with the responsibility of selling all their Manhattan land for the best possible price.

They ended up selling Manhattan for $24.

Looking at Manhattan now, you'd think it is worth way more than that.
10/ The most fascinating thing about this deal is that, even adjusted for inflation, $24 doesn't seem close to what Manhattan would be worth today.

What would have happened had the Native Indians given that $24 to their investment officer, and he compounded it at 7% p.a?
11/ This is where *The Rule of 72* comes into the picture.

According to the rule of 72,

Compounding at about ~7% per annum,

you can double your money every 10 years.
12/ So, by 1636, the Indians would have had $48.

1646 - $96
1656 - $192
1666 - $284

and so on, doubling every 10 years.

By 2020, they would be having over $20 Trillion, had they compounded at 7% per annum.

This is an astonishing figure.
13/ Warren Buffett remarks about this story in his 1965 annual letter.

While he conservatively estimated at $20 per square foot for 1965, even today, the potential of the sum paid compounded at 7% p.a doesn't come anywhere close to Manhattan's current value.
14/ Coming back to Warren's story. He was looking for a framework to compound his $9000 with.

He wanted to get to a million before age 35.

He found Ben Graham, and adopted the value investing framework. The rest is history.
15/ Where the power of compounding really shines is in Warren's own life.

When he was 40, his net worth was less than $40 million.

When he was 50, his net worth was around $300-400 million approximately.

That's like 1/3rd of 1% of his current net worth.
16/ 99.66% of Warren's wealth came after his age of 50.

That's what we see in the graphic here.

This right here, is the power of compounding at work.
17/ What does this mean for you?

You may not have 70+ years of runway ahead of you.

What should you do?

@MohnishPabrai discovered Warren Buffett at age 29, and he realised if he could compound $1M at 26% per annum, he could get to $1B by age 60.
18/ Likewise, use the rule of 72 to decide what your compounding goal is, what rate of compounding would help you get there, and get to work.

Going back, if you double your capital every 10 years, you can achieve 1000x in 100 years (at a rate of 7% p.a).
19/ Likewise, if you want to double your capital every 5 years, you must compound at ~14% p.a. You'll reach 1000x in 50 years.

If you compound at ~28% p.a, you'll reach 1000x in 25 years, doubling your capital every 2.5 years.
20/ Now, whether 28% p.a CAGR is possible or not is another question.

Needless to say, there are always going to be opportunities.

You need a framework to capture them and maximize your CAGR as much as possible.
21/ You need a systematic framework to compound your effort in any field, and to put compounding at play.

It could be business, investing, trading, sports, anything.

Once you have the framework, acquire the discipline to put the framework to its best use.
22/ So, this is a quick primer on Compounding 101 and how to put the rule of 72 to good use.

What's your compounding goal? Comment it down below.

If you would like to see more threads like this, smash the follow button on my profile.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shravan Venkataraman 🔥🚀💰

Shravan Venkataraman 🔥🚀💰 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @theBuoyantMan

11 Jan
To avoid this, do a monte carlo analysis and find out the probabilities of range of drawdowns and work with leverage on your system accordingly.

For ex: a system I trade currently, has a historical maxDD of 4.76% and recently it hit a maxDD of about 5.5%.
On conducting monte carlo analysis of the system, I understood that the probability of maxDD to be below 5% is only ~3%.

There was about 61% probability of the maxDD to be between 5-10%

and ~2% probability that it could be around 20-40%.

You need to be aware of these.
Once you know the odds of a certain range of maxDD happening, then you can confidently deploy your strategy.

You'd also face drawdowns that lie within your comfortable range instead of being misled by just the historical maxDD as it happened in the series of trades historically.
Read 4 tweets
11 Jan
Systematic Trading, backtesting, etc., may sound like a current generation fad, but they are clearly not.

As far back as 1990s, several big funds, quant funds have used backtesting/exploration, etc., to develop systems to trade.

Only recently it has become viable for retail.
Until late 2010s, we didn't have faster internet speeds, access to better data, low cost brokers, access to ease-of-use programming languages/tools to backtest strategies thoroughly.

MATLAB was complicated. Excel was limited without VBA. VBA was not everyone's cup of tea.
Python going mainstream as a programming language alongside R programming made it possible for many people to start backtesting their ideas.

And proliferation of several helpful tools/libraries in Python has also helped several people move fast in backtesting.
Read 5 tweets
10 Jan
One of the parameters you use to understand your trading strategy performance historically before deploying it is called the RoMaD.

Return over Max Drawdown.

It's essentially (annual return % / max DD % )

Let me explain each part of this.
Average return % :

If your system started with $100,000 in 2010, and ended 2020 with $200,000, that's a 7.18% annual return over 10 years.

Maximum Drawdown % :

If portfolio falls from 150k to 120k, that's a 20% drawdown. Amongst all such drawdowns, maximum value is taken.
Return over Max Drawdown will then be

7.18% / 20% = 0.359

The RoMaD value is expressed as a ratio.

*This helps answer the question*:

Am I willing to accept an occasional drawdown of X% in order to generate an average return of Y%?
Read 6 tweets
8 Jan
One of the systems I have been forward testing would have gone from 3 lakhs on September 1st 2020 to 13.4 lakhs by December end.

Needless to say, I was shocked and surprised.

Time for a thread 👇
I have been forward testing a system on BankNifty for last four months.

I always forward test with 1 lot or the smallest size possible.

This is to make up for lack of clean data in the backtesting process.
I wanted to see what would have happened if I'd aggressively compounded the system.

I have been testing this with 2xATM option buying (for every 1x futures).

So, I took the results of the one lot test (after commissions and everything else is deducted) and applied it.
Read 12 tweets
6 Jan
Back in 2017 Sep, I stashed away some money in BTC on a particular crypto platform.

I vowed to never withdraw it, or look at it for 10 years (Taking a leaf out of @dmuthuk's playbook)

It will either be the best investment of my life or turn out a dud.

Let's see.
Initially, I had spread out my investment across BTC and few altcoins including Ethereum.

Within a few months, once bitcoin went to 20k and then crashed to 4-5k range, I cashed out all altcoins and put everything into bitcoin.
Now it may seem like it was a good move investment wise.

But no, this is pure DUMB LUCK.

There was no investment thesis.

I didn't (and still don't fully) understand Bitcoin/Blockchain.

For those who want to understand, their whitepaper + code is the place to start.
Read 4 tweets
1 Jan
Are you planning on handing over your money to an algo trading platform?

Maybe you want to subscribe to a strategy or two and make insane returns.

Here's why you shouldn't do it, and save your money instead.
1/ Maybe you want to have a strategy development company deploy such algorithms on your account with respective brokers.

Or the service itself has strategies that you just subscribe to and authorize your trading account with, and it will automatically trade your money.
2/ When it comes to @Tradetron1 there are a slew of issues.

Let's keep aside the lack of transparency and the total regulatory non-compliance for a moment.

First off, with most of the strategies, the backtests are BOGUS.
Read 37 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!