Sen. Mark Warner, currently cmte vice chair, soon to be chair: "Echoing what the chmn [Sen. Rubio] has said, perhaps the greatest challenge facing you as the DNI will be a rising China that is committed to surpassing & eclipsing the US militarily, economically & technologically"
2/ DNI Nominee Avril Haines: "we should provide the necessary intelligence to support long-term bipartisan efforts to outcompete China, gaining & sharing insight into China's intentions & capabilities..."
3/ DNI Nominee Avril Haines: "...while also supporting more immediate efforts to counter Beijing's unfair, illegal, aggressive & coercive actions as well as its human rights violations whenever we can"
4/ DNI nominee Haines in response to Rubio question re PRC outreach to sub-national officials to influence them:

"obviously the counter-intel challenge w/ China is a very important one, a priority & sthg I will hv to focus on" [but notes she hasn't had an in-depth briefing yet]
5/ Sen. Warner: "for a no. of decades we had a bipartisan consensus on China -- that the more they came into the world order, the closer they would move to some level of international norms.

I'll be the first to acknowledge I was part of that consensus & I think I was wrong"
6/ Sen. Warner says it is important to be "clear-eyed" about China and asks,

"Is China under the rule of the Chinese Communist Party an adversary of the United States?"
7/ DNI nominee Haines's answer to Sen. Warner question: "Is China under the rule of the Chinese Communist Party an adversary of the United States?"
8/ Sen. Susan Collins: "China is clearly a key geopol adversary & poses a threat to our interests in terms of the theft of IP & also potential spying thru its telecom cos. Do u hv any concerns abt how the Obama admin approached China when u served in ur capacity in that admin?"
9/ DNI nom Haines's re Sen. Collins's ques re Obama admin China approach:

"our approach to China has to...meet the reality of particularly the assertive & aggressive China that we see today"

Says reqs "aggressive stance" - ackn at a place "more assertive than where we had been"
10/ Sen. Ben Sasse says often hear "bipartisan" thrown around but re China, heard Rubio & Warner "really singing off the exact same song sheet."
11/ Sen. Sasse says China policy shldnt be used as "partisan cudgel"

"were bipartisan failures for a decade & a half, &...nearly bipartisan agmt [for abt half decade]...that dealing w/ the CCP is the no. 1 issue that the natsec community faces"
12/ Sen. Sasse echoes Sens. Rubio & Warner: "we need the American ppl to understand that our opponent is not the Chinese ppl, our opponent is not Chinese Americans, but our opponent is the Chinese Communist Party"
13/ Sasse says 5 broad natsec threats [China, Russia, Iran, DPRK, "grab bag of jihadis"] but "if we look at the resources of IC, it still doesn't show a primary focus on China that I think is the bipartisan consensus in this committee." Asks abt IC being slow pivoting to China
14/ DNI nom Haines: "I've heard from a no. of members a concern over this issue [IC slowness re pivoting/rebalancing to China] &, if confirmed, I will absolutely make it a priority from my perspective to ensure we are allocating the right resources in addressing this issue"
15/ Sasse asks Haines to commit to returning to SSCI in six months w "a strategic plan of how China actually becomes in reality not merely in rhetoric the no. 1 priority of our IC"

She commits to coming back to the cmte w/in six months after confirmation "on this issue"
16/ Sen. Bennet asks re China's long-term horizon thinking relative to US.

Haines ackn urgent > important problem, but says there's recognition re need to think abt challenges strategically, hv whole of govt long-term plans & to promote them in ways that'd make them sustainable
17/ Hearing ends w/ DNI nominee Avril Haines answering Sen. Cornyn question re role of deterrence in cyber realm.

Her answer is instructive beyond the cyber realm:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tanvi Madan

Tanvi Madan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tanvi_madan

19 Jan
India will be relatively pleased w/ Lloyd Austin's remarks/answers re China, India, Indo-Pacific at confirmation hearing. It'll be less pleased -- though not surprised since he's a fmr CENTCOM commander -- re his answers on Pakistan
Source: answers submitted to Senate Armed Services Cmte advance policy questions armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
For reference: Mattis's answers to advance policy questions on Pakistan ahead of his 2017 confirmation hearing
Read 4 tweets
19 Jan
1/ Secretary of Defense nominee Lloyd Austin at Senate Armed Services Committee confirmation hearing:

"Globally I understand that Asia must be the focus of our effort and I see China in particular as a pacing challenge for the Department"
2/ SecDef nominee Lloyd Austin on advance policy Qs

"Globally...most significant challenge I will face will be to ensure DOD's contd efforts to prepare & strengthen the US military for a dynamic, future security landscape driven by accelerating competitions w China & w Russia.."
3/ SecDef nominee Austin in written answers says strategic competition w/ China & Russia primary challenges but "because of its ascent and the scope and scale of its military modernization, China is the top priority"
Read 25 tweets
19 Jan
🧵 A lil’ late to this but important enough an issue that I’d like to flag why I have a slightly different perspective from Jeff on this. CAATSA sanctions wld hv a greater impact on US-India relations than GSP/tariffs & cld set back 🇮🇳🇺🇸 coop & Indians' view of US. Here’s why 1/
2/ A major reason for Indian hesitations about the US historically has been the sense that as a partner it is

- unreliable
- attaches too many strings
- weaponizes interdependence

(thus curtailing Indian strategic autonomy)
3/ Comes from India seeing US

- cut off supply of mil equipment, parts in 1960s in midst of a crisis
- stepping back in 1971 from promises to help India if China attacked
-post-nuclear test sanctions

India-US rels might hv “survived” those but they were significant setbacks
Read 15 tweets
19 Oct 20
1/ Delhi says India-Japan-US exercise "Malabar 2020 will see the participation of the Australian Navy"

This is thanks to Chinese behavior & a reflection of deepening IN-AU ties.

For many, this has been the litmus test for the Quad. Now what? 🇦🇺🇮🇳🇯🇵🇺🇸
pib.gov.in/PressReleasePa…
3/ Seeing a lot re potential hostile Chinese reaction to mQuad. Taking foreigners hostage? Using force to change territorial status quo? Economic coercion Beating up diplomats? Oh, wait.

It is China's already hostile reax that has driven 🇦🇺🇮🇳🇯🇵🇺🇸 closer.
Read 6 tweets
8 Oct 20
🧵 1/ I know some of you really wanted a joint statement from the Quad ministerial, so you can create your own from the readouts, which give you a sense of what the countries covered (read them for more specifics too). This can get you started:
2/ What Australia, India, Japan & the US outlined as their visions for the Indo-Pacific
3/ Some of you were also really sad that most of the Quad didn't mention China, but, as always, read between the lines in what they said publicly.

And if you think they met in person in the middle of COVID19 & didn't talk about China privately, well, bless your heart
Read 5 tweets
7 Oct 20
🧵 1/ Fascinating chain of events. Taiwan rep. office in India places an ad in 2 Indian newspapers (Indian Express, Statesman) & a program on a news channel. Over the last few months there hv also been op-eds by no. of Taiwanese officials (incl FM Wu) in Indian newspapers
2/ Chinese emb. in India (routinely places ads & objects to Taiwanese op-eds) sends Indian media a letter telling them to "stick to" official 🇮🇳 position on Taiwan, what they can/cannot call Taiwan & Tsai Ing-wen & not to send wrong signals to the public
3/ Taiwanese foreign minister Joseph Wu...
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!