I oppose the removal of subsidy in Parliament canteen.
For heaven’s sake, it doesn’t just cater to MPs, but to over 8000 staff & 3000 security persons too.
Offices, whether govt or corporate, often cater subsidised food.
Good affordable canteen is a right of employees.
1/n
Affordable canteens are a right of employees, just like crèche.
Whether in Tech companies like Google or in Courts, in Army or ONGC, media offices or universities - subsidised canteens are a norm.
Why throw out a basic right of employees in name of anti-politician populism? 2/n
And how many MPs use these canteens? 200 or 300, that too for 60-70 days a years!
Rest, they r facility for employees, media & security
The nearest restaurants are 2-3 km away frm Sansad Bhawan. Are these people supposed to step out in search of cheap food during duty hours?3/n
Actually, subsidised Parliament canteens were cleverly used to underline the privileges of MPs and politicians, merely to incite hatred against them.
It was used to build public perception against democratic functionaries & institutions, portraying anything political as bad. 4/n
Constant ridicule of politicians created an acceptability for non-politicisation of politics. That is nothing but a denial of and a loss of respect for democratic norms, rights & processes.
Demand for apolitical is actually support for autocracy.
5/n
No wonder now PM doesn’t address PC, yet draws no outrage. Employee rights r being taken away with little resistance. Institutions r caving in.
The passive acceptability for all this is due to Apolitical Citizenry created via hate thru seemingly innocuous things like canteen! 6/n
So coming back to canteen issue. Parliament canteen was never a privilege. It is a basic right of not just MPs, but all those working for the Parliament.
Plz don’t legitimise the thought that canteens are a luxury. It will normalise undoing of a basic right of working people.7/n
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
India produces over 60% of the total vaccines sold globally.
Free Universal Immunisation Programme was launched way back in 1985.
As Covid vaccination rolls out, let applause this great Indian success story, that must be handled with great care to ensure continued credibility
The vaccine production started in British times. Immediately after independence, a vast network of vaccine research and manufacturers was developed that made the success story possible
Expanded Programme of Immunisation was launched in 1978.
People of my age remember the extensive free vaccination in schools and all still have marks of vaccination on our arms.
कृषि क़ानून विरोधी आंदोलन से जुड़े 2 मुद्दे सप्रीम कोर्ट में हैं:
1. क्या ये क़ानून संवैधानिक हैं? 2. ये कि आंदोलन ग़लत है,SC उसे समाप्त करने का आदेश दे।
आज दूसरे मुद्दे पर सुनवाई थी,संवैधानिक पहलू पर अभी बहस नहीं हुई है।
आंदोलन को SC ने ग़लत नहीं माना,सरकार पर नाराज़गी दिखायी
SC बिना संवैधानिकता की बहस पूरी किये क़ानून ख़ारिज नहीं कर सकता।
इसलिए क़ानून को फ़िलहाल लागू न करने का सुझाव आज कोर्ट की ओर से आया।
किसान क़ानून की संवैधानिकता पर नहीं, उसके प्रभाव पर सवाल उठा रहे हैं। क्योंकि कोई भी क़ानून संविधान सम्मत होते हुए भी दुष्प्रभावी हो सकता है 2/n
आज की सुनवाई किसानों की माँग पर नहीं थी। ये सुनवाई उन याचिकाओं के कारण हुई थी, जो कोर्ट की मार्फ़त किसान आंदोलन को ग़लत ठहरा कर, उसे समाप्त करने का निर्देश कोर्ट से चाहते थे।
मगर कोर्ट ने सहमति नहीं दी। इसलिए आंदोलन चलता रहेगा।
3/n
The controversy on the two Indian covid vaccines is a direct consequence of the lack of credibility of this govt’s decisions.
When unscientific assertions, impulsive decisions, impure data are integral to any govt’s public policy, then all public policies become questionable.
Vaccinating 138 crore won’t be easy. India has successful experience of polio eradication recently and many more in past. Infact, polio vaccine was an oral one, didn’t require trained manpower. Yet it was humongous task and took meticulous planning and execution. 2/n
Covid vaccination is an even more daunting task. The scale of pandemic called for emergency responses in vaccine development, in inventory management and in delivery mechanism. Routine administrative responses would never deliver. Everyone understands it.
Had the govt....
3/n
A letter written in 2010 by former Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar has surfaced, wherein he is advocating reforms in APMC.
It’s hinted that he his changing his position due to political motivations.
What are the facts? Let’s examine. 1/n
The letter talks of Draft APMC Rules 2007. 1. In draft rules, state govts are empowered to declare any market as Special Market or Sp Commodity Market functioning under a Market Committee. 2. New agri-laws have placed the private agri business out of the ambit of mandi system 2/n
3. 2007 Rules empower Market Committees Rk collect levy, fees, under the aegis of state govts. 4. New agri-laws restrict APMC or state govt from collecting levy, fees from private market.
3/n
आज पूर्व कृषि मंत्री शरद पवार का 2010 में मुख्यमंत्रियों को लिखा पत्र सोशल मीडिया में जारी हुआ है, जिसमें वे APMC में सुधार की वकालत कर रहे हैं।
इशारा ये है कि वे अब राजनीति के चलते पाला बदल रहे हैं।
पर क्या ये सच है? आइए देखें
1/n
पत्र में Draft APMC Rules 2007 की वकालत की गयी है
1. इसमें राज्य सरकार को अधिकार दिया गया है कि किसी मार्केट को स्पेशल मार्केट या स्पेशल कमोडिटी मार्केट घोषित कर सके, जो मार्केट कमेटी के अधीन काम करेगी 2. नए कृषि बिल में कृषि व्यापार को मंडी समिति से दायरे से बाहर कर दिया है।2/n
3.2007 के सुधार अनुसार मार्केट समिति को टैक्स लेवी, फ़ीस एकत्र करने का अधिकार था, जो राज्य के अन्तर्गत था।
4.नए कृषि क़ानून में कोई APMC मंडी या राज्य सरकार टैक्स लेवी या फ़ीस नहीं ले सकती।
(2007 की मार्केट समिति को मंडी समिति की तर्ज़ पर ही सुझाया गया है) 3/n