Here is an article that says Finger, Kane and Robinson did credit the film, specifically a still of Veidt in makeup as Gwynplaine, for the inspiration.
Funny that Universal did not remake this film as a talkie (it did get a release with sync music)
The book was published in 1869, and is set in England during the time surrounding the brief turbulent reign of Catholic James II. The mutiliation of the protagonist is a symbol for what society is doing to people.
“The paradise of the rich is made out of the hell of the poor.” ― Victor Hugo, The Man Who Laughs
“I am come to warn you. I am come to impeach your happiness. It is fashioned out of the misery of your neighbour. You have everything, and that is composed of the nothing of others… As for me, I am but a voice. Mankind is a mouth, of which I am the cry. You shall hear me!”
The story is melodrama and social commentary more than horror, but there is no getting around the visual impact of that silent movie to the book. The book and movie differ in their endings.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is my first time going through P.L. Traver's book, Mary Poppins (The first in a series). I grew up with the Disney film, so it brings up the differences in adaptations, particularly in how Disney softened Mary Poppins.
In this first book, Mary Poppins is not there to fix anything really. She just, well, "Pops in". She is stern, aloof, vain, curt and, quite honestly, a liar in that she fervently denies several of the adventures with Jane and Michael ever happening.
The version of the book I went through is not the original 1934 version. The chapter called "Bad Tuesday" originally had Mary Poppins, Jane and Michael visiting people in different parts of the globe. Criticism about stereotypes prompted Travers to revise it in 1967...
The Doctor : "Do I have the right? Simply touch one wire against the other and that's it. The Daleks cease to exist. Hundreds of millions of people, thousands of generations can live without fear... in peace, and never even know the word "Dalek"."
You might think "Of course I would wipe out the Daleks" but the Doctor steps it deeper. Are his orders to do so just? What about all the unions and bridges made between others in the struggle against the Daleks? Does he have the right? Is it right? What does it do to him?
NuWho would revisit this "Have I the right" decades later, this time with John Hurt as the Doctor (or whatever name he went by).
There is also the plot device that some things are 'fixed' in time, like Adric's death, and must be.
You have a basic idea of what you want to read, now you walk the aisle and feel the Muse. Maybe its the spine, or the condition, or the cover or the color. Something inspires you to reach for ...that...book...
How to Pick your Next Read
2: Browse the online market
Whether its an online bookseller or a library, you just browse it all from your comfy chair, and never worry about how many books you can actually carry (or read).
How to Pick your Next Read
3: Fix the immediate need
You are looking for solutions. From minor repairs to planning a wedding to getting a mortgage or writing a resume. You need some solutions to the problems that you are worried about right now.
Just the 13th episode, a fit number for this tragedy.
It originally aired December 8, 1966
A sad tale is best for Winter
(art by juan ortiz)
The episode begins with a murder - the on stage murder by Macbeth, as played by actor Anton Karidian (a play on Carradine?).
Arnold Moss is the actor playing the actor. A veteran of Shakespeare and Broadway, his voice oozes gravitas.
This episode is wonderful #startrek in exploring moral issues, but in some ways its very much not Star Trek.
By that, I mean there is very little scifi or science fantasy here. Its a script that could be adapted easily to other settings. You can argue thats deliberate.