This morning BLS released 2020 data on unionization, and it is fascinating. A thread. 1/ bls.gov/news.release/u…
In 2020, 15.9 million workers in the U.S. were represented by a union—a decline of 444,000 from 2019. However, there was an *increase* in the unionization *rate* in 2020, from 11.6% to 12.1%. WHAT. 2/
In a nutshell, union workers saw less job loss than non-union workers in the pandemic. 3/
This was due to two key reasons. One is that unionized workers have had a voice in how their employers have navigated the pandemic, and have used this voice for things like negotiating for terms of furloughs or work-share arrangements to save jobs. 4/
The other reason is a “pandemic composition effect.” There has been (on average) more pandemic job losses in industries with lower unionization rates, like leisure and hospitality, and less job loss in sectors with higher unionization rates, like the public sector. 5/
A simple decomposition of the increase in the overall unionization rate in 2020 reveals that about half—47%—of the increase was the result of a pandemic composition effect, while half—53%—was due to union workers seeing less job loss than nonunion workers in the same industry. 6/
The number of unionized state & local government workers actually rose (by 91,000) in 2020—even though state and local government employment declined by 485,000. This was likely due in part to the effort by state & local govt unions to increase membership in the wake of Janus. 7/
Women experienced more job loss than men in 2020 (a loss of 4.9 million jobs for women compared to 4.6 million for men), but the number of women in unions declined less (there was a decline in unionization of 31,000 among women and 413,000 among men). 8/
This was likely due largely to composition effects—e.g. women being disproportionately concentrated in leisure & hospitality, which has seen a lot of job loss but has low unionization rates, & in the public sector, which has seen less job loss & has higher unionization rates. 9/
Unionization rates for women (11.8%) inched close to rates for men (12.3%). 10/
Of all major racial and ethnic groups, Black workers have the highest unionization rates, at 13.9%. This compares with 12.0% for white workers, 11.0% for Latinx workers, and 10.0% for AAPI workers. 11/
In 2020, Black workers experienced the largest rate of decline in employment (-8.3%, compared with, for example, -6.4% for white workers) but Black workers also experienced the largest increase in the rate of unionization. 12/
The fact that Black workers saw an increase in unionization is likely due largely to composition effects. Black workers are more concentrated in the public sector, which has seen less job loss & has higher unionization rates. This is particularly true for Black women. 13/
One of the main pillars of Biden’s Build Back Better plan is to dismantle the barriers to union organizing and collective bargaining. Today’s data reinforce the importance of this goal. AT 12.1%, the unionization rate is still less than half what it was roughly 40 years ago. 14/
Unions help narrow the black–white wage gap. This means that the decline of unionization has played a significant role in the expansion of the Black–white wage gap over the last 4 decades—and that an increase in unionization would move us towards racial economic justice. 15/
Importantly, the decline in unionization over the last four decades occurred despite a considerable increase in the share of workers who say they want union representation. 16/
Why the disconnect? U.S. employers go to extraordinary lengths to keep workers from forming unions. Employers are charged with violating labor law in 41.5% of union election campaigns. In 1 in 5 campaigns, employers are charged with illegally firing workers for organizing. 17/
Employers are charged with making threats, engaging in surveillance activities, or harassing workers in nearly a third of all union election campaigns. And, employers spend roughly $340 million annually on “union avoidance” consultants to help them stave off union elections. 18/
The key reasons workers want to be in unions—to improve their wages, benefits, and working conditions—are precisely the reasons unions are opposed so fiercely by corporate interests. 19/
As union membership has eroded, the share of total income in the economy going to the rich has skyrocketed. In other words, efforts to erode unionization have paid off handsomely for the small sliver of people on the winning end of rising inequality. 20/
The huge gap between the share of workers who *want* a union and the share of workers who are *in* a union underscores that our system of labor laws is not working. Fundamental reform is required to restore workers’ rights to a union and collective bargaining. 21/
The Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, which passed the House last year with bipartisan support, provides a comprehensive set of reforms that would strengthen private-sector workers’ right to form a union and engage in collective bargaining. The time is now. 22/
We (@cmmcnich, Margaret Poydock, and I) have a new quick paper on the 2020 unionization numbers that covers what’s in this thread and a little more depth about what they mean. Here you go. n/ epi.org/publication/un…
Addendum: I think union representation is a more-relevant statistic than union membership when considering the economic impact of unions, because all workers in a bargaining unit—regardless of whether they are union members—get the benefit of being represented by the union.
So, throughout this thread, when I say “unionization,” I’m talking about people represented by a union (not just those who are members of a union). But the main results are the same if you look at union membership instead of union representation.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Heidi Shierholz

Heidi Shierholz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hshierholz

21 Jan
This morning, DOL released some of the last unemployment insurance (UI) claims data of the Trump era. That means this release helps us understand the economy President Biden just inherited. Here we go. 0/
Another 1.3 million people applied for UI last week, including 900,000 who applied for regular state UI and 424,000 who applied for Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA). 1/ dol.gov/ui/data.pdf
The 1.3 million who applied for UI last week was an increase of 113,000 from the prior week. The increase underscores that layoffs are increasing as the virus surges. Total initial claims are now back to roughly where they were at the end of September. 2/
Read 19 tweets
4 Dec 20
Here we are, astonishingly, at the last #JobsDay of 2020. It’s a moment to take stock of where things stand after the first 11 months of 2020 (and the first 9 months of COVID). Brace yourselves. 1/
We added 245,000 jobs in November, but the labor market remains in crisis. We lost so many jobs in March and April that even though we’ve now added jobs for 7 months in a row, we are still nearly 10 million jobs below where we were in February. 2/
Further, in the year before the recession, we added 194,000 jobs per month on average, so from February to November, we could have added around 1.7 million jobs. That means the total gap in the labor market right now is on the order of 11.6 million jobs. 3/
Read 25 tweets
3 Dec 20
Another 1.0 million people applied for UI last week, including 712,000 people who applied for regular state UI and 289,000 who applied for Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA). 1/
After two weeks of increases, the 1.0 million who applied for UI last week was a welcome decline of 105,000 from the prior week. 2/
But, last week was the 37th straight week total initial claims were greater than the worst week of the Great Recession (GR). If you restrict to regular state claims (b/c we didn’t have PUA in the GR), initial claims are still nearly three times where they were a year ago. 3/
Read 22 tweets
25 Nov 20
Plot twist! Unemployment Insurance claims are being released today, *Wednesday*. Here we go. 0/
Another 1.1 million people applied for UI last week, including 778,000 people who applied for regular state UI and 312,000 who applied for Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA). 1/ dol.gov/ui/data.pdf
The 1.1 million who applied for UI last week was an increase of 22,000 from the prior week’s figures. This is the second week in a row of increases in initial claims. Not good. 2/
Read 20 tweets
29 Oct 20
Here we go, the last unemployment insurance (UI) numbers before the election. Another 1.1 million people applied for UI last week, including 751,000 people who applied for regular state UI and 360,000 who applied for Pandemic Unemployment Assistance. 1/ dol.gov/ui/data.pdf
Before going into more depth on the UI numbers, I’m going to do a quick aside on those record-breaking 3rd quarter GDP numbers that also came out this morning. What do they really tell us? 2/
GDP is now 3.5% below where it was at the end of 2019. THIS IS THE SECOND-LARGEST THREE-QUARTER DROP ON RECORD. 3/
Read 25 tweets
26 Oct 20
The administration has a proposal that would make it easier for businesses to classify workers as independent contractors instead of employees. If finalized, it would cost workers at least $3.7 billion each year. 1/ epi.org/publication/ep…
This is a simple giveaway to corporate executives and shareholders. It is an absolute disgrace that this is what the Trump administration is focusing on right now. 2/
The (at least) $3.7 billion cost to workers of this proposal is comprised of at least $400 million in new annual paperwork costs for workers and at least $3.3 billion in reduced pay and benefits every year. 3/
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!