Aiwuyor's "Understanding ADOS" was flawed from the start because from its base, it came from charges that the movement might be funded from right-wing interests because Yvette Carnell wore a MAGA hat (as a prop device) on a livestream & an Ann Coulter tweet. (1)
https://twitter.com/mrhick01/status/1353144322217144321
On top of that, there is ongoing accusations of Russian bot activity that Shirleen Mitchell never proved, yet it remains the engine of #ADOS accusations 2 1/2 years later. (2)
The anger from PAists comes from the #ADOS rejection that ADOS as a people are a "lost tribe" that require some exotic metaphysical healing balm from Pan-Africanism, when the only functional PAism applied today is in American universities' Black professors' wishcasting... (3)
...and via Black bookstores and utopian hopes.
PAism is not applied in any meaningful way with African sovereign nations, nor is there a genuine pathway for ADOS to have fast-tracked dual citizenship. (4)
PAism is not applied in any meaningful way with African sovereign nations, nor is there a genuine pathway for ADOS to have fast-tracked dual citizenship. (4)
Even if ADOS as a people wanted to wanted to return to African nations en masse, the nations of the continent have NO WAY to absorb 36-38 million ADOS into their countries, much less do so without extreme disharmony & rancor.
(5)
(5)
It's the ideological clashes with PAists that energizes the mad-on that they have with the ADOS movement. It has devolved into mutual contempt. (7)
I assert that Dr. Darity's Rx for how Black American reparations, which #ADOS supports w/modifications, provide the best pathway for ADOS to actually get it.
Crayola-based flat-blackness arguments for reparations from the United States will fail. (8)
Crayola-based flat-blackness arguments for reparations from the United States will fail. (8)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
