This thread is on Section 22's role in the Nov 3 1943 raid by Saratoga & Princeton on the IJN cruiser force assembled at Rabaul to stop the Bougainville invasion & radar threads leading else where.

It is at the 49 to 54 min. in this podcast. /1

the-bilgepumps.simplecast.com/episodes/bilge…
Adm. Halsey's raid was a strategic gamble because the pending Central Pacific landing at Tarawa had robbed him of his battleships and cruisers.

All he had were Saratoga and Princeton. /2

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_o…
But while it was a strategic risk for Halsey.

It was a very...calculated...one, thanks in large part to GHQ SWPA Section 22's radar intelligence of Rabaul. /3
In October & early November 1943 Section 22 was working closely with 5th AF to get their planes under IJN radar coverage into Rabaul harbor. The strike photos and post strike BDA were used to spot & plot radars...including ones on IJN cruisers./4
Section 22 found a weakness in Rabaul's radar coverage to the North. There was a mountainous rise to the immediate north of Rabaul harbor on New Ireland and it was covered in heavy jungle.

The Japanese garrison knew of it. See the USSBS interview./5
The IJN garrison clued the cruiser force as to the weakness. The captain of the HIJMS Atago, in terms of radar, was the Adm "Ching" Lee of the IJN and his ship was the USS Washington. His ship's 10 CM Type 22 focused at this gap and gave a 10 min. warning to start moving/6
Atago, under a new captain, same radar crew and more radar, was the command cruiser for Adm. Kurita at the battle off Samar.

Her radar crew knew how to use their Type 22 to tell ship size.

She also had Kurita's Fleet Command plot./7

arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/0…
Had Atago not been sunk by the USS Darter & Dace wolfpack. Her extensive radar fit and ace radar crew at the time would have been at the Battle off Samar.

She would have fed Kurita's fleet plot with accurate ship size and course data.

Taffy 3 would have been annihilated./8
Section 22's report on Atago is not the only radar thread missing from Pacific War standard narratives that reached back to Rabaul.

Another was RADM Ota Minoru./9
As commander of the 14th Base Force on New Ireland, RADM Ota owned the gap in Rabaul's radar coverage that Saratoga & Princeton's planes flew through and savaged the IJN cruiser force./10
RADM Ota had a powerful patron in the IJN. He was not left to rot at Rabaul.

The lessons in tactically operating and camouflaging the Cape St. George radar on New Ireland vs. 5th AF air power and Section 22's targeting followed Rear Admiral Ota Minoru, back to Japan./11
In March 1944 Ota was appointed to command Sasebo Kaiheidan and Sasebo Keibitai.

Kaiheidan's were a training/personnel pool org., but in emergency a Kaiheidan provided their men for local defense, a Keibitai's original duty.

These organizations had radars...and targets/12
On paper, Ota Minoru was the very model of a IJN Naval Infantry Admiral. He had commanded the naval infantry regiment meant to invade Midway.

Yet his time at New Ireland & Sasebo change him. He matured and learned the craft of being a operational level C3I warrior./13
And he learned to cooperate with the IJA and see the USA as the real enemy.

This made Ota...dangerous...in Japan.

So his IJN patron gifted Ota with a poisoned chalice that let Ota die honorably w/o hurting his patron.

He was given command of the Okinawa naval garrison./15
...and the Ryukyus.

These were the location of Imperial Japanese Navy Type E Look out (Radar) Stations under RADM Midoro Ota. All sites, save for Kume Jima, had RADAR units that could access US Mark III IFF beacons./16
Ota's knowledge of the need for radar at the Kume Jima "Bobitai" (Special Lookout Station type “E”) was such that Ota actively cooperated with General Ushijima's 32nd Army radar network for months, to the extent that Ota traded a navy radar crew for an Army radar./17
Ota's radar cooperation with Ushijima was not in any US Navy document.

This fact was buried in the post war US Army occupation report titled "Intelligence Report No. 30: Northern Ryukyus".

Also buried was the fact every Ryukyus radar, IJA or IJN, was under Ota's control./18
RADM Ota wanted a 4-meter band/72 Mhz IJA Tachi-6 for a very special reason. It operated on the USN's TCS radio primary frequencies.

The S. Okinawa Tachi-6 very carefully tuned it's transmission to be on top of USS El Dorado's - Adm Turner's command ship - TCS broadcast./19
The neat thing about a Tachi-6 was it was a true bi-static radar. The FEAF "Short Survey on Japanese Radar" found its receiving antenna's could be displaced up to 20km away from the transmitter and still provide early warning./20
However, when the very carefully tuned Tachi-6 transmitters were not operating...their receiving antenna's still did, listening to powerful 70 Mhz signals like on USS El Dorado.

We don't know if Ota's Tachi-6 were direction finding...but AGC were attacked like they were./21
And the extent of the Tachi-6 jamming was such that special Southern Okinawa photo missions were run to identify the transmitting antenna's for naval bombardment./22
The sad thing about Okinawa for the USN was Adm Halsey was not involved in it's planning. His experience with Rabaul's land based radars did not enter the planning for Operation Iceberg.

A comparison of where TF 58's CVBG operated compared TF 38 made that clear. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trent Telenko

Trent Telenko Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TrentTelenko

21 Jan
This thread is about how WW2 Japanese radar technique evolved under the threat of GHQ, SWPA Section 22 radar hunting aircraft.

This photo shows Sec 22 radar hunting coverage from the month of Nov. 1944 /1
This was how the Japanese were camouflaging their Type 13 radars in November 1944. /2
This is Section 22 Hunter-killer Ferret "Beautiful Ohio." /3
Read 10 tweets
30 Dec 20
@t3narrat0r Here is a good place to start:

THE OFFICIAL HISTORY OF THE R.A.A.F.
DIRECTORATE OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND RADAR
BY W/CDR, G. F. GATES

IONOSPHERIC ORGANISATION.
groups.google.com/g/rec.aviation…
@t3narrat0r This document is hard core ionospheric radio propagation. It was published in 1948 and refers back to WW2 in sections.

Circular of the Bureau of Standards no. 462: ionospheric radio propagation
archive.org/details/circul…
@t3narrat0r This is the best single source on the Interservice Radio Propagation Laboratory's work on H/F radio in WW2

Developments in Radio Sky-Wave Propagation Research
and Applications During the War*
Proceedings of the IRE ( Volume: 36, Issue: 2, Feb. 1948)
ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/16976…
Read 11 tweets
26 Nov 20
@James1940
@Alan_Allport
@JonathanBoff
@AdrianGregory20
@HGWDavie
@mark4harrison
@ProfGSheffield

1/ This thread is addressing why invading Italy was Strategically & Operationally necessary for the Allies in WW2.
2/If you are going to look at the latest historical research Battle of Sicily, you have to start with Dr. Gregory Hospodor lecture here:

Bitter Victory? The Allied Campaign for Sicily Revisited
Image
3/And this for the Italian land campaign.

Cirillo makes clear Southern Italian air bases were gold for the strategic bombing campaign.

The Ground War in Italy (2014)
Col. Roger Cirillo
Image
Read 18 tweets
28 Oct 20
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 1/ Okay, I went to the US Army's Signal Corps branch pub, the Army Communicator, at this link, to pull the history of WW2 German Army NVIS use to answer some challenges from yesterday.

See URL:
cybercoe.army.mil/AC/archive.html
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 2/ The next few tweets use information and screen captures from articles in the Winter 2004 issue of the Army Communicator that you can find at the previous link.

The German Army was using NVIS HF radio on armored cars in 1935.
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 3/ By 1938, the Germans were moving to much bigger armored cars to support HF radios with both NVIS & Skywave antennas, so they could execute long range reconnaissance in support of their mobile doctrine.

The FuG-10 radio used for NVIS HF coms was not small nor light.
Read 23 tweets
27 Oct 20
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius >>Would y’all say that Rommel is overrated?

No...but context is needed to understand the nature of his victories in North Africa.

German mobile forces were operating with a superior signals system based on near vertical incident skywave (NVIS) transmission.

See photos: ImageImageImage
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius Basically a vehicle with an NVIS antenna and a high frequency radio could communicate reliably with another such vehicle out to 200 km.

This enabled the Germans to coordinate by radio at much longer distances than the 8th Army who did not use similar signals gear. ImageImage
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius That superior mobile operations radio range from NVIS was also tied into a really effective signals intelligence system that informed German commanders of Allied dispositions.

German armored car recon units could be steered to allied ground units SIGINT.

weaponsandwarfare.com/2020/08/13/ger… Image
Read 5 tweets
25 Oct 20
1/ This is another thread on the Azeri Drone War on Armenia.

I've seen a recent open source analysis of what the Azeri drones are doing to Russian air defense equipment in the hands of Armenia.
2/ The Azeris, with or w/o the assistance of Turk instructors, have killed a number of 9K33 Osa AKM / SA-8 GECKO systems, a number of S-300PS / SA-10B GRUMBLE battery components, and a 9K331 Tor M2KM / SA-15D GAUNTLET.
3/ 1st, there is a claimed GPS/inertial configuration for the larger MAM-L munition that allows it to glide to 14 km range from an unspecified altitude, likely the typical operating altitude for the TB2 of ~18 kft.

This is stand off range for Osa.

See:
roketsan.com.tr/en/product/mam…
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!