@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 1/ Okay, I went to the US Army's Signal Corps branch pub, the Army Communicator, at this link, to pull the history of WW2 German Army NVIS use to answer some challenges from yesterday.

See URL:
cybercoe.army.mil/AC/archive.html
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 2/ The next few tweets use information and screen captures from articles in the Winter 2004 issue of the Army Communicator that you can find at the previous link.

The German Army was using NVIS HF radio on armored cars in 1935.
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 3/ By 1938, the Germans were moving to much bigger armored cars to support HF radios with both NVIS & Skywave antennas, so they could execute long range reconnaissance in support of their mobile doctrine.

The FuG-10 radio used for NVIS HF coms was not small nor light.
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 4/ An interesting find regards mobile NVIS was a photo of a 1930's Soviet version of the Vickers 6-ton tank sporting an NVIS radio antenna.

This is a big what the h--l moment regards Soviet-Nazi secret tank development cooperation.
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 5/ Returning to German armored forces, by 1940 in France, Guderian had integrated tactical operation centers (TOC) for multiple radio types in SPW half tracks to support VHF tactical, HF operational (see NVIS) and higher level coded Enigma

See:
cdvandt.org/DEHS2008-def.p…
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 6/ These German mobile force signals techniques from France are what Rommel brought to North Africa.
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 7/ Rommel also brought a mobile signals intercept and decoding unit that utterly penetrated all British Commonwealth codes until it's destruction during the 1st Battle of El Alamein in 1942.

Photo from:
cdvandt.org/DEHS2008-def.p…
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 8/ The problem with a great intel source is you have to believe it at the right time.

Before Crusader, the British planted documents on a German armored raid. When they attacked, Rommel believed the deception over his SIGINT because he really wanted to crush Tobruk.
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 8a/ TIK History discusses this starting at the 2:49:30 time hack in his Crusader video here.
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 9/ My point in laying this out is not about trolling, but about "authoritative" history sources.

History writers are hostages their sources.

All you can do is pick the best ones and use their own best judgement as to the who, what, where, when, how and why.
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 10/ The biggest difference between WW1 and WW2 was the deployment of mobile radio telecommunications networks to control land, sea and air forces.

The Germans prepared for WW2 with the best offensive radio telecommunications, radio nav, and radar systems on the planet.

See :
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 11/ The result of that German interwar preparation with mobile NVIS HF radio communications was the Germans side-stepped many of the issues of radio propagation for British Commonwealth mobile radios in North Africa.
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 12/ During Crusader UK No. 11 tank radio didn't do voice at night beyond a couple of miles and it's Morse signals were blacked out between 5 miles and 100 miles. While the No. 19 radio needed different frequencies at night to work at all.
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 13/ During Crusader, the UK Army didn't know what it didn't know about radio propagation. It's archival reports reflect that ignorance.

It took the UK until late 1941 to establish the Interservices Ionosphere Bureau (I.S.I.B.) too deal with it.
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 13a/ But only after 43 UK based planes were lost in one night when weather closed in & radio propagation changed.
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 14/ This paywalled article is the I.S.I.B. WW2 history.

The influence of wave-propagation on the planning of short-wave communication
Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers - Part IIIA: Radiocommunication(1947),94(11):200
ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/52997…
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 15/ Archival operational reports are great for a writing military history story...but we are over 75 years away from events.

The social and technological context we in the Sat-com & smart mobile device 21st century carry in our times mean we miss the that context for the 1940's
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 16/ Not knowing _How_ those competing German & UK telecommunications systems worked in North Africa, given the limited period understanding of radio propagation in the context of WW2 mobile operations, means you cannot know _WHY_ things happened as they did.
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 16a/ If only because the people who wrote the Operation Crusader operational reports didn't understand what happened to them.

That knowledge was years in their future when they wrote their reports.
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 17/ This is why I'm pointing out other sources in this thread, outside the archives, that provide that period social/technological context.
@KtunaxaAmerika @crusaderproject @bermicourt @sommecourt @NavalAirHistory @JanTattenberg @JeffCRutherford @mike_bechthold @AlexFitzBlack @GeorgeMCR01 @garius 18/18 A 21st century archival historian cannot understand what a retired US Army signals officers with decades of knowledge of HF communications in 20th century mobile operations does.

I'll trust this CV over an archival historian any day.

YMMV

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trent Telenko

Trent Telenko Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TrentTelenko

25 Oct
1/ This is another thread on the Azeri Drone War on Armenia.

I've seen a recent open source analysis of what the Azeri drones are doing to Russian air defense equipment in the hands of Armenia.
2/ The Azeris, with or w/o the assistance of Turk instructors, have killed a number of 9K33 Osa AKM / SA-8 GECKO systems, a number of S-300PS / SA-10B GRUMBLE battery components, and a 9K331 Tor M2KM / SA-15D GAUNTLET.
3/ 1st, there is a claimed GPS/inertial configuration for the larger MAM-L munition that allows it to glide to 14 km range from an unspecified altitude, likely the typical operating altitude for the TB2 of ~18 kft.

This is stand off range for Osa.

See:
roketsan.com.tr/en/product/mam…
Read 16 tweets
20 Oct
@DWB55 Mr Burns,

I've quite a few maps of the New Guinea campaign.

Few to none do what you just did there...you show the Japanese side with naval combatants & transports of less than 1,000 tons.

MacArthur Reports has a few such maps.

US Naval historians would rather slit their...
@DWB55 ...wrists in a long warm bath before consulting that resource and almost none have looked at the Japanese & Australian small ships and barges role in the New Guinea campaign.

Doing so is not career enhancing for what it reveals about the WW2 USN narrative.
@DWB55 When you compare your map to this one. You get the air-sea-land context of the Japanese projecting power and guarding sea lines of communication.

Here we are at over 75 years since these combats and it's only now such maps are made?
Read 5 tweets
18 Oct
1/There has been a great deal on hypersonic weapons recently on Twitter.

This thread is my take on them & why Russia, China and the USA are going there.
2/I agree and disagree with one of the better recent twitter threads on hypersonic weapons.

Hypersonic weapons are yet another overhyped weapon system liked the F-35, Zumwalt DDG and Ford class carrier.

3/That does not mean deploying them would not aid the national security interests of China, Russia & the USA.

I have touched on Chinese interests with this tweet.

Read 26 tweets
18 Oct
@LarrySchweikart @GoroOuter If Sir Henry Phelps Brown & Sheila Hopkins did not address the massive shift in industrialization by electrification covering 1920 - 1965 they have a methodological problem.

The shift from line shaft & belt mechanical power transmission to electrical had huge productivity plus.
@LarrySchweikart @GoroOuter The widespread use of electric motors small enough to be connected directly to each piece of machinery meant any location with a concrete slab and electrical connections could be a factory.

It also made factories built post 1920 both easier to relocate and harder to destroy.
@LarrySchweikart @GoroOuter This is why the Soviet Union could relocate it's factories during the German invasion of 1941.

It is also why strategic bombing of German factories did not degrade production like pre-war air power theorists expected.

I've written about that here --
chicagoboyz.net/archives/58334…
Read 21 tweets
17 Oct
This naval boarding exercise is the 'gust front' of optionally crewed drone swarm boarding actions.

While the jet suit in that exercise was not the best. There are others which may be far better for the human.

This Bastille Day demonstration made clear you can fly on a drone-like platform with and assault rifle.

And if you are thinking a Marvel comic Green Goblin's goblin glider, you would not be wrong.

But there is no reason that the Bastille Day Flyboard couldn't be remotely operated after delivering it's armed crewman.
Read 10 tweets
17 Oct
@downix @RupprechtDeino There are three issues with air certifying a SM-6.

1. Cold soak issues
2. Structural carry modifications
3. Vibration hardening from carrier launch & flight carriage.

Raytheon has recent experience w/cold soak.
tucson.com/business/local…
@downix @RupprechtDeino Structural carry modifications to the missile frame would be where the cost in the SM-6 upgrade would live.

However, compared to the new AIM-260 rocket ramjet design. An air-launched SM-6 would be longer ranged & have a much bigger installed base to work from upon introduction.
@downix @RupprechtDeino Vibration hardening from carrier launch & air carriage is another one of those "not easy" issues.

The AIM-120's carriage on F-16 wing tip hard points in the 1990's & 2000's in the various no-fly zones killed a generation of Slammer war shot dead, dead, dead.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!