I tweeted this thread back in October & here are the analytics I just took a look at, which suggest that it didn't make much of an impact.
These words are from a song, The Boxer, by Paul Simon:

🎶A man hears what he wants to hear & disregards the rest🎶

Humans have a fatal capacity for ignoring what they don't want to know.

How to explain this in evolutionary terms?
These words are from a song, The Boxer, by #PaulSimon:

🎶A man hears what he wants
to hear & disregards the rest🎶

Humans have a fatal capacity for ignoring what they don't want to know.

How to explain this in evolutionary terms?
Our ancestors survived by recognising threats & dealing with them. Otherwise we wouldn't be here.

The threats I'm referring to, however, are very different from the ones our ancestors faced, which were local & immediate. The threats facing us are neither of these.
Sitting here at my computer, I am under no apparent threat. The threats I'm referring to are abstract & easily ignored, or rationalised out of existence.

Much cleverer people than I think I'm delusional, but I think they use their cleverness subconsciously to delude themselves.
And because they have a much higher social status than I do, others believe them rather than me, which, before the emergence of civilisation, made evolutionary sense.

But not any more, because the artificial environment of civilisation perverts & corrupts evolved human nature.
It's important to understand HOW civilisation perverts & corrupts evolved human nature, which is by facilitating the abuse of power to the personal advantage of certain individuals at the expense of society at large & its long-term survival.
Could human civilisation have achieved what it has without perverting & corrupting evolved human nature?

Presumably not. It was a phase it had to through. But it is a phase we have to quickly put an end to, if we want our civilisation, unlike those which preceded it, to survive.
I refer above to the corruption of evolved human nature by civilisation itself, which leads to the corruption of human behaviour, which is what actually poses an existential threat to our survival.

The corruption is like a cancer with which our entire body politic is riddled.
Everyone who is anyone in society, with any wealth & social status is a manifestation of this cancer, esp. the billionaires, film stars & pop idols we so admire & envy.

This is what makes it so difficult (impossible?) to cure.
Writing the above tweet brought home to me that curing this cancer may not be possible, that our civilisation, like all civilisations before it, is bound to fail & fall, as it is on course to do very soon.
Writing the above tweet brought home to me that curing this cancer may not be possible, that our civilisation, like all civilisations before it, is bound to fail & fall, as it is on course to do very soon.

But I'm going to keep on trying anyway.
It just seems the right thing to do - & is personally satisfying.

In the same vein as "better to have loved & lost than never to have loved at all", it is "better to have tried & failed than to give up trying altogether.

Time enough for that when my life is over.
That tweet also reminded me that it is these successful, wealthy, high-status individuals I must get my message through to, because they are the one's with the means to effect real change in the short amount of time now available to us to save our civilisation.
However, for the reasons I have already made clear, these are the last people who want to hear my message.

Unlike your typical social-justice & leftwing revolutionary, I am not going to demonise them for being so rich & privileged at the expense of others, although it is true.
Most of us in the West, incl. myself, are relatively rich & privileged at the expense of coming generations, but lack the excess wealth necessary to effect radical social change.

Thus my appeal to the wealthy to reach out to your kinfolk, which it is the natural thing to do.
And to form genuine, sustainable communities with them in solidarity with coming generations, that we might preserve our civilisation for them, rather than run it into the ground as we are currently doing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Philosopher Kin vs Big Brother

Philosopher Kin vs Big Brother Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rogerahicks

25 Jan
From MY #Sermon_on_the_Mount:

#NativeBritons are taught by state & academic authority to deny & despise their own kin & race, & instead to intermarry with other races, so that their own race is destroyed.

But what I tell them is this: Love your kin & your own, European, race.
Love other races too, & those that are mixed, but do not deny & despise your own White race. Those who teach you otherwise (like #DavidAaronovitch & #NickCohen) are serving #BigBrother, who wants you to love him, rather than your own kin & race.
But do not hate David, Nick, nor any of the other racial self-deniers & self-haters, for they have been misguided by a well-intentioned, but misconceived, ideological, #NeverAgain, response to the evils of Nazism.
Read 4 tweets
24 Jan
At my age, I can afford to laugh at this, because by the time FUCK! actually arrives I'll be dead & gone.

Our children's only hope is that enough people quickly realise that FUCK has already arrived & start taking drastic action.
What drastic action, you ask?

That depends very much on your situation & means.

If, like me, you have very limited means (which largely boils down to money) there is very little one can do, except get together with people who have more means.
If I had the means, I would found a community based on sustainable values.

The individualistic values which underpin existing society are inherently unsustainable. This has to change, or our civilisation will soon perish.
Read 5 tweets
24 Jan
Next Wednesday is #HolocaustRemembranceDay.

The greatest honour we could afford the victims of Nazism would be to LEARN from it, but instead, all we do is demonise it.

We cannot learn from what we demonise. We need to understand it! @HolocaustMuseum
It is not just Nazism that is, understandably, demonised, but everything associated with it.

The Nazis manipulated & abused human tribalism for their own evil ends, in #NeverAgain response to which human tribalism itself was demonised, which was a HUGE mistake.
Tribalism is as inherent & essential a part of evolved human nature as is our sexuality. Demonising it is madness - but with pernicious, power-political method to it.
Read 4 tweets
24 Jan
Putting modesty aside, I consider this insight on a par with the Copernican Revolution, which moved the Earth from being stationary at the centre of the universe, to being a planet orbiting the Sun.
It took the Catholic church more than 200 years to accept this truth.

If it takes academia that long to accept the truth I have revealed, our civilisation, & academia with it, will be long gone.
Read 4 tweets
21 Jan
United we Stand. Divided we Fall.

There is no truer truism than this.

The UK is not Kingdom, but a mercenary #PatronState deceitfully posing as a nation, in order to legitimise itself, its ruling elites & the power they wield & abuse.
Kingdom has the same root as kin. The English, Scots, Welsh & Irish are - or were - all kinship groups, on which the British state imposed a union in 1707. The people were not asked. This was government of, by & for the elites.
The Irish rebelled & eventually won their independence. So did the American colonists, who won their independence a lot sooner. But instead of becoming a genuine nation, as the founders had hoped it would, America became just a bigger, more powerful, clone of Great Britain.
Read 9 tweets
21 Jan
The moral authority of the British Parliament rests on 3 pillars:

1) Traditions going back many centuries.
2) The myth of British nationhood.
3) The myth of British democracy: that Parliament serves the interests of British society at large.
These traditions are an Orwellian construct, based on lies, deceit & a regime of rewards & intimidation.

Britain is a mercenary #PatronState deceitfully posing as a nation, in order to legitimise itself, its ruling elites & the immense power they wield & abuse.
British democracy is what it has always been: government of the elites, by the elites, for the elites. Notwithstanding that we enjoy some important democratic freedoms, which will hopefully allow us to radically reform the system, provide we proceed peacefully & within the law.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!