Again, idealistic gurus coalesce around a narrative in which the role of professionals is to "save" children & families from real-world entanglements. Why work *with* parents & families when we can do things FOR children & engineer a brave new world 🤯 socedassoc.files.wordpress.com/2020/11/reimag…
Yes, we should "grasp the current crisis’s upending of accepted wisdom" - because as @Jendaffin notes elsewhere, well intentioned staff are "paralysed in that system [&] overwhelmed by the shame associated with being stuck & contributing" - @NewSystemAlly threadreaderapp.com/thread/1334928…
We genuinely do need radical critique. E.g. challenge around the dominant, health-based discourse that frames so much around Early Years & PE teachers - but "our" (professional) frustration with "their" (neoliberal) meddling is actually avoiding critique!
Where @ChristianSeelos & co 👇 see "the difficulty we face is the professionalisation of our sector" the "Reimagining Education" team 👆 just suggests doubling-down on a narrative in which under-resourced, micro-managed experts just need freeing from shackles to change the world!
Many of us despair of "care" AND the "education" discourse around Early Years "provision" - as both consolidate the place of professionals in a domain where we might prefer to scaffold confidence, resilience & mutual support in informal childcare & other mutual support networks🤔
Yes, "play based pedagogy should spread further & more widely into primary schools rather than schooling pushing onto Early Childhood Care & Education" & Phenomenon-based Learning approach is positive - but the profession is notoriously conservative! tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
Question: might we "Re-imagine Education" *together*? Might we sense-make with (and among) others? Remaining open to seeing where that led? Respecting the role of all who felt a calling to engage? Seeing teaching as a vocation rather than a profession? 🤔 threadreaderapp.com/thread/1353755…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/n How come we still have academics sustaining narratives of #obesity rather than of how real people find value & meaning in everyday lives? Revisit @whatsthepont on @tobyjlowe / @snowded & accept criticising "neoliberal" does not make things progressive! whatsthepont.blog/2019/05/19/cam…
New out 🤯 A review which says lots about the academic context in which it was written - with its embedded behaviorist fixations on just implementing *better* - with complete disregard for the unintended consequences of treating "agency" as a dirty word 👇 cam.ac.uk/research/news/…
In all #becausehuman fields, we see justifiable professional kick-back at reductionist agendas driven by a focus on #obesity & nonsensical CMO guidance of 60 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per day for healthy growth and development 👇
What does it take to sustain screwiness in the way the world works? Mostly, it's just good people, trying their best to get us to a better place... within constraints which pretty much preclude us actually getting anywhere! A case in point with @JamesRRudd mdpi.com/2227-9067/8/1/…
These authors come across as hugely committed to something we might all agree upon: improving young people's experiences of physical education through better school-based-interventions. Sounds great? Agreed, & pretty much everything about their study models best practice 🥳
Sadly, established "best practice" involves further embedding the medicalisation of PE as if it should be about the potential contribution of physical activity to everything from quality of life, self-perception & cognition to the likelyhood of becoming healthy & active adults 🤯
"Riding bikes give you a way of seeing & acting in our environment in creative ways. Always looking to progress and push skills & boundaries. Skateboarders will know this feeling too. You never see a city the same again" - perception @michaelthaber blog 👇
"In BMX there is a ever moving boundary of things that have been done. Not only by you, but by anyone. Once you know something has been done it opens possibilities [...] Just knowing someone has done something similar changes what you think can be done 👇 mikehaber.co/2020/11/21/bmx/
"...people employing security guards to do their job are thinking they are setting up governing constraints. But often these become enabling constraints, creating the pressure & opportunity to get things done" & "stuff gets done when security turn up" 👇
"What follows [is] a protest against psychologistic approaches to ‘grounded cognition’ [that] effectively put the ground inside the brain, leaving individuals stranded in an unspecified ‘environment’ which is invoked
merely for the purposes of [the body]" quote.ucsd.edu/sed/files/2014…
"What distinguishes the expert from the novice, then, is not that the mind of the former is more richly furnished with content [but] a greater sensitivity to cues in the environment & a greater capacity to respond to these cues with judgement and precision" - not representatons!
"For the ground of knowing – or, if we must use the term, of cognition – is not an internal neural substrate that resembles the ground outside but the very ground we walk, where earth & sky are tempered in the ongoing production of life" - the walker is "thinking in movement" 👇
This matters 👇 It starts with worries about talk of pre-pubescent children "using the quasi-mythopoetic terms" ‘elite’ and ‘international’ & addresses growing tendencies to view youth athletes as "commodities" - well done @andykirkland71 & @markstkhlm 👀 ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Argument: "There Is No Such Thing as an International Elite Under-9 Soccer Player" 💪
Their reference to "commodification" links to the biggest of all for me: talk of "producing" athletes / players 😡
Language matters.
We never (ever) "make" (anything) out of young people!
We need to see this through to its logical conclusion... which is that "talent pathways" are NOT production lines.
What/how we write reflects convention... so let's get beyond criticism of individual contributors - it's CONVENTIONAL to write like this 👇
"Where old-school conspiracists amassed what looked a lot like evidence; the new school’s calling cards are repetition and weaponized equivocation [...] if you don’t even pretend to have evidence, there’s nothing for your opponent to debunk" @rachelefrasercambridgereview.cargo.site/Dr-Rachel-Fras…
"Michael Gove’s infamous remark that ‘the British people have had enough of experts’ [...] has been a boon for reactionary technocrats eager to pathologise an ignorant public and impose elite gatekeeping on social media.
C.f. "the spectre of rule by experts" - a serious concern?