1/Lots of tech companies and workers are making noises about leaving San Francisco, LA, NYC, and other "superstar" cities.

Some are predicting a shift to remote work and distributed companies.

Let's take a hard look at what that would actually require.

noahpinion.substack.com/p/can-knowledg…
2/We're all familiar with the trend of tech companies and other knowledge industries (finance, biotech, etc.) piling into a few tech hubs, raising rents and house prices.

Now some think the advent of Zoom, Slack, etc. might reverse this trend.

blog.initialized.com/2021/01/data-p…
3/But escaping the superstar cities is going to be tough.

The forces keeping tech companies in places like SF are so strong that these regions have essentially become prisons for these companies.
4/In order to escape the prison of the superstar cities, tech companies and other knowledge industries will have to overcome the Four Jailers of Industrial Clustering:

1. In-person office productivity

2. Thick market effects

3. Knowledge spillovers

4. City life amenities
5/I'm actually pretty optimistic that companies can find ways to make remote work productive.

Studies show that working from home *some* of the time actually tends to raise productivity.

blog.hubstaff.com/remote-workers…
6/Does that mean people can work productively away from the office ALL of the time?

It's not clear yet. But remember, in order to shift out of top cities, tech companies only need to shift PART of their workforce to 100% remote.

That seems very doable.
7/Then there's the "thick market" effect.

Lose your engineering job in SF, and it's easy to find another nearby.

Lose your engineering job in Tulsa and you're in trouble.

Same goes for companies who need to find new employees.
8/To beat the thick market effect, companies and workers will need to learn to do 100% remote job search and hiring. They'll need to get comfortable working closely with people they've never been in a room with.

That seems like a difficult but doable shift.
9/VCs will also have to get used to investing in companies remotely.

In fact, this was a shift that needed to happen long ago, because VCs' cultural preference for in-person investing means that a lot of cities unfairly lose out.
10/But remote work, hiring, job search, and investing are all things that are possible as technology improves.

Companies will look for solutions, and they will find solutions.

But a harder challenge will be replacing the good things about cities that companies DON'T generate.
11/One of those good effects of cities is knowledge spillovers.

Many economists believe that when knowledge workers (like engineers) live in close proximity, they exchange ideas that boost their productivity.

nber.org/papers/w26270
12/No one company is responsible for knowledge spillovers. They happen outside the company.

So companies can't really replace this benefit of cities.

Maybe the internet will naturally replace knowledge spillovers. Maybe Stack Overflow is all we really need.

...Maybe??
13/Maybe universities, or industry associations, or other actors can try to recreate virtual spaces where engineers can mix, mingle, and share ideas? Just spitballing here.

Anyway, this going to be a taller order than switching companies over to Zoom/Slack.
14/Now we come to the fourth benefit of cities, and the most difficult to replace.

Cities are great places to meet people and do fun stuff.
15/Here's an important but subtle point:

If distributed remote work means that tech workers just move to DIFFERENT SUPERSTAR CITIES, you haven't really changed anything!
16/To really distribute the workforce, you need more than for San Franciscans to work in Tokyo and New Yorkers to work in LA.

You need to get knowledge workers to work in Tulsa, Oklahoma and Cleveland, Ohio.
17/One function of cities -- dating -- actually seems somewhat easy to replace, since it's basically just a 1-to-1 matching process.

But social discovery -- meeting whole groups of friends online -- is a problem that no social media company seems to have solved yet.
18/And restaurants will be even harder. I can't even think of how cities like Tulsa will be able to achieve the variety and quality of dining options of cities like Los Angeles.

Maybe there is a way, but it'll take some creative supply chaining and matching!!
19/Anyway, so there you have it. To escape the prison that cities like San Francisco have become, knowledge industries will need to UNBUNDLE THE CITY completely, for the first time in human history.

It's a tall order. We'll see if they can do it!

(end)

noahpinion.substack.com/p/can-knowledg…
20/Oh and if you like stuff like this, make sure to sign up for my free email list, so you can get my newsletter delivered directly to your inbox! :-)

noahpinion.substack.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Noah Smith 🐇

Noah Smith 🐇 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Noahpinion

26 Jan
1/My latest @bopinion post is about Biden's call for an immigrant amnesty -- a path to citizenship for the country's 11+ million undocumented immigrants.

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
2/Illegal immigration halted and went into reverse sometime in 2007.

But would Biden's amnesty restore the pre-2007 situation?

Possible, but highly unlikely.
3/First of all, many people believe that Reagan's 1986 amnesty -- the biggest in American history -- was responsible for the huge wave of illegal immigration.

But in fact, it probably *reduced* that wave.

voxeu.org/article/us-imm…
Read 12 tweets
25 Jan
Is it morally wrong to like an animal because it looks cute?
Second question: Is it morally wrong to like a human being just because they're good-looking?
Third question: Is it morally wrong to dislike an animal just because it looks gross to you?
Read 5 tweets
24 Jan
1/I've been thinking back on the Bernie movement this week. And I felt it was time for a retrospective.

So let's talk about that movement, and what it was, and how it changed our country, and how it failed to change our country.

noahpinion.substack.com/p/the-bernie-m…
2/Thanks to Bernie, "socialism" isn't a dirty word in America anymore.

wsws.org/en/articles/20…
3/And even the "centrist" Biden is putting forward the boldest, most progressive legislative agenda since...LBJ?

washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…
Read 7 tweets
23 Jan
1/Some people look at the amazing cost declines in solar power and batteries and ask "Where's the productivity growth?"

In this post, I answer that question: "It's coming."

noahpinion.substack.com/p/answering-th…
2/It's true that solar, for example, has come down in cost by a truly stunning amount.

This is a LOG plot. Check out the y-axis!
3/Some people look at this graph and ask "So, where's the productivity growth?"

Honey, you gotta actually BUILD the solar before it does anything.

applieddivinitystudies.com/stagnation/
Read 18 tweets
22 Jan
I respect disagree with this thread. The idea that hyperinflation results from a regime change is an unproven hypothesis. It's something we should be studying, yes, but for now it's just a guess.
That was supposed to be "respectfully", dang it
In particular, if we stop worrying about austerity like we used to, and then at some point we DO experience hyperinflation, the Tom Sargents of the future will look back and call our attitude shift a "regime change". And who will be able to disprove them?

Read 8 tweets
22 Jan
1/Lots of people ask me: "Noah, how much can the U.S. government borrow before bad things start happening?"

In this newsletter, I try to give a definitive answer to that question.

Unfortunately, the answer is: No one knows.

noahpinion.substack.com/p/no-one-knows…
2/Some people say that we're already heading into the danger zone with respect to debt.

My instinct is that these people are completely wrong, and we're not in danger. But I can't *prove* them wrong, because we don't actually know how much is too much.

ft.com/content/d49b53…
3/How can we think about what the government's borrowing constraint really is?

Well, it helps to do a thought experiment. Let's imagine if the government kept borrowing exponentially more. $100 trillion. $100 quadrillion. Etc.

What would happen?
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!