The primary purpose of the State is not to serve society at large & its long-term survival, but to facilitate its self-exploitation, to the narrow & short-sighted personal advantage of it elites & favoured clients, at the expense & ultimate self-destruction of society at large.
Why has this not been recognised by the academics we look to as authorities on understanding society & the state?
Academics are privileged clients and employees of the state themselves. That's why.
From The Boxer, by Paul Simon:
🎶A man hears what the wants
to hear & disregards the rest🎶
This is why we are allowing a growth-dependent, grossly materialistic, mercenary, rapacious & driven global economy to plunder & spoil our planet, of which #AGW is just a SYMPTOM.
It is also why Europeans/Whites are destroying their own race.
Perversely, the narrow & short-sighted self-interests of individual Whites (incl. academics, whose job it is to know better) are prioritised over those of their kinship groups (tribe, nation & race).
Academics have actually provided an ideology, of White racial self-denial & self-contempt, which helps facilitate this madness, which is harming not just their own race, but other races too, humanity at large & the health of their planet, whose biodiversity is being decimated.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#JodiShaw is doing a great job of helping to expose the madness of White racial self-denial & self-contempt, which now dominates, not just #SmithCollege, where she works, but wider, Western society at large. @Smith_Surge via @YouTube
The madness which has befallen Western civilisation in the form of Post-Racial #Multiculturalism, DIVERSITY, Inclusion & #AntiRacism is rooted in #CriticalRaceTheory & is related to the madness responsible for WW1, in which "victory" paved the way for the rise of Nazism & WW2.
The British state, establishment & Parliament base their claims to legitimacy & moral authority on two Orwellian ideologies, one of which deceitfully equates state & nation, while the other, rooted in #CriticalRaceTheory, teaches Native Britons to deny & despise their own race.
Why is this not recognised by the academics we look to as authorities in understanding society & the state?
Academics are privileged clients and employees of the state. That's why.
Britain is an Orwellian construct, based on lies, deceit & a regime of rewards & intimidation.
Britain is not a nation, but a mercenary #PatronState" deceitfully posing as a nation, in order to legitimise itself, its ruling elites & the immense power they wield & abuse.
We urgently need academics to recognise these truths, so that we can do something about it.
White Americans have fallen prey to the same kind of moral supremacy & bullying their forebears left Europe to escape from.
America never became the genuine Nation its founders had hoped it would, but just a bigger, more powerful, clone of Great Britain.
They knew that it would be difficult enough forging a nation from different European peoples of the same race, & impossible to include other races. Which is why, in the 1790 Nationalization Act, they restricted citizenship to Whites.
#HolocaustMemorialDay/#HolocaustRemembranceDay are both failing in their mission of #NeverAgain, because, instead of seeking an understanding of human tribalism, which the Nazis had manipulated & abused for their own evil purposes, they demonise & seek to suppress it.
This was an understandable, but misconceived response to the evils of Nazism (esp. on the part of traumatised Jews).
Misconceived, because evolved human nature is inherently tribal, which is as essential to being human as is our sexuality.
To demonise human tribalism is like demonising male sexuality in response to a series of brutal rapes, which would obviously be an absurd & insane thing to do.
The demonisation of human tribalism is indeed no less insane - utter madness, but with power-political method to it.
"Noted scholars of antisemitism, including Prof David Feldman, director of the Pears Institute for the Study of Antisemitism at Birkbeck, University of London, have criticised its shortcomings." @PearsInstitute theguardian.com/news/2021/jan/…
Noted scholar of antisemitism, #DavidFeldman, has little understanding of his discipline, because he rejects viewing it from an evo-sociobiological perspective.
His views are subjective (strongly influenced by Jewish trauma at the hands of the Nazis) & unscientific.