Figuring out who to listen to and what's right/wrong in the world of social media, podcasters, and experts of everything is difficult.

As a scientist and writer here's1 trick & 6 lessons on figuring out if a writer, podcaster, or expert should be listened to or not. 👇👇👇
First, the quick way:
See what an expert says about something in an area you have expertise in.

For example, I search for where they talk about exercise or athletic performance.

If they are wrong but confident in it. It tells you that something is wrong in their thinking
They overindex on superficial understanding and don't do the deep work.

It doesn't mean they'll be wrong on everything, but it should make you question whenever the person ventures away from an area where they've had 'skin in the game' success in.
How powerful is this heuristic?

It's the only thing that shook loose a Qanon conspiracy theorist.

For example, one guy was an expert in computers. When he read the nonsense & technobabble the Q folks spewed about his field, he questioned everything else

reddit.com/r/QAnonCasualt…
That's the "cheat/trick" way to evaluate whether someone's worth listening to.

What are other signs and signals that we should NOT listen to someone and they don't know what they're talking about?

Here are 6 things to watch out for:
1. Non-stop complexification.
If someone is using broad, complex-sounding, and ambiguous words it's usually a sign that they don't understand the topic.

Complexity is easy to hide one’s lack of knowledge behind while trying to sound smart.
There's science behind this.

When investors have some knowledge in the area, but not expertise, then utilizing jargon in your pitch is helpful in getting them to invest.
When researchers added neuroscience terms to a text, people were more satisfied with the explanation, even when it didn’t make sense.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
2. The person is selling something or trying to develop a specific brand.

Yes, we all promote, but there’s a big difference between wanting to spread one’s ideas and wanting to build a copyrighted brand based on them to the exclusion of other ideas.
3. They suggest precise and narrow interventions with massive impacts.

Anytime you read about a single intervention with super wide-ranging effects you should be skeptical.

The flu shot works for the flu. It doesn't cure cancer. Watch out for overreaching
4. The story is the main driver.

The story should represent the science, not the other way around.

If the story is carrying the weight, the science is likely thin.
5. Attempting to create an artificial “us versus them” mentality.

But if someone is using conflict and tribalism to sell their idea, then the idea probably isn’t strong enough to stand on its own.
You see this all the time in writing about diets, fitness, and behavioral change. If the method is strong and probably true, the writer shouldn’t need to fabricate battles to sell it.
6. Guru syndrome.

If a person lacks humility, never addresses how they might be wrong, and reaches far beyond their expertise in providing answers for everything, it’s probably best to stop reading their work.
If those are things to watch out for, then how do we actually decide what's worthwhile?

Introducing the 3-legged school. If you have all three, the stool balances well. If only 1 of 3, good luck. The legs:

1. Theory
2. Research/Science
3. Practice/History
1. Theory:

Is the idea backed by a strong theory?

Does the theory make sense in simple terms?

2. Research/Science
Is the idea supported by empirical evidence, and not just a few small studies but lots of studies, and ideally large ones?
3. Practice/History

Does the idea (or variations of it) appear in different contexts throughout history and in modern practice?

Do performers with skin in the game utilize/have success with it?

Are there solid patterns that emerge?
If you enjoyed this thread, consider following.

I post threads on the science of performance 2x per week.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Steve Magness

Steve Magness Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stevemagness

29 Jan
THREAD: What is Great Coaching?

Here are 11 insights I've learned over the past 10 years in working with world-class athletes and coaches across sports.

On Learning, Motivation, Culture, and Sustainable Performance.

👇👇👇
1. Do the Work to Understand.

When you don't know what you're doing, you tend to focus on the small things that don't actually matter. You emphasize what you can control, not what has an actual impact

Do the work to differentiate what looks good versus what impacts performance
2. Drop the Ego. Find People Who Know More.

The best coaches seek out wisdom from others.

Fiercely guarding your "secrets" backfires. Coaching comes from conversation. The more smart thinkers you're talking to, the clearer your thinking will be.
Read 13 tweets
25 Jan
Leading into today's game, the Packer's defensive coordinator made his team watch last year's loss of the NFC championship.

Let's take a look at why focusing on the negative right before a big game might not be the best idea...

A Thread on hormones & priming for performance:
What we watch can prime us for performance. We intuitively know this. We can sense our emotions and moods change as we watch something good or bad.

But what we often neglect is the hormonal impact that occurs, which can cause a performance impact for days.
Let's walk through a few studies. In this study, researchers found watching a victory increased Testosterone levels by 44%. When watching a defeat, no significant change in T levels.
researchgate.net/publication/26…
Read 14 tweets
22 Jan
The "tough/hardass" coaching model occasionally works on the HS/college level because athletes have no control.

It largely fails on the pro level because athletes have more autonomy & understand their value

Pro's want to be treated as people, not subordinates.

Why? A thread:
It's not that young athletes don't want the same things (autonomy) as older. It's that there's an inherent power differential and they are nearly powerless to escape it.

They "survive" the 'tough' training, they don't thrive under it.
Human motivation is very simple. Self Determination Theory boils it down to 3 basic needs:
1. Feel like you belong
2. Feel like you can make progress
3. Feel like you have some control over your life (autonomy)
Read 13 tweets
19 Jan
With most jobs, you need to be two different people, depending on the situation.

The coach who is demanding and a perfectionist when correcting, yet caring and empathetic after a loss

The author who is creative and forgiving when writing, yet ruthless and critical when editing.
When writing I'm lax & forgiving. The goal is production. Good, Bad, whatever, put it on the paper

My editing self is critical & efficient. Focused on cutting. Trim all but the essential

Separating the 'self' allows you to create space so that the creative self doesn't hesitate
The editing is the hard part for me.

What I do to help is dump all of the ‘cut’ sections into a document titled “Future Ideas and Articles.”

It helps to think of it not as cutting, but as the beginning of a potential new project.
Read 4 tweets
11 Oct 20
Lessons learned:

Every year on my birthday I work my way through a year of scribbling in my notebook. Reflecting on what I've learned.

Here are my 2020 takeaways. If you enjoy them, consider sharing them with others who might find them of value.

A long thread:
The key to building relationships and trust is vulnerability.

It's the reason I'm still close to old teammates. We suffered for a common goal. Pain, fatigue, crying, puking. We saw it all. Being 'exposed' allowed us to drop the facade and accept who we are.
Put your ego side.

No one really cares if you succeed or fail. For most of us the pressure comes from inside. We blow things up to be much bigger deals than they are.

The antidote is a bit of perspective.
Read 21 tweets
8 Oct 20
Collect and Cultivate Ideas.

This phrase is a note on my desk. It serves as a reminder that the way towards better thinking, coaching, and performing is to keep exploring. Don't get trapped in your own siloed way of thinking.

How do you collect ideas? Read-Experience-Connect
Read-
Simple. Read a lot. But make sure you go broad. Too often as we gain expertise, we focus only on going narrow, deeper into our field of expertise.

Narrow is needed. But broad primes our mind to think creatively. To connect disparate concepts back to our pursuit.
So what's my reading look like?
For breadth- I read books that give me broad overviews of a variety of fields.
For depth- A combo of 'down the rabbit hole' research articles + textbooks
Listen to audiobooks-to broaden my horizon (history, fiction, etc.)
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!