At risk of upsetting people, I need to address why I think teachers should feel very safe going to in-person learning after vaccination. Let's start with why COVID-19 was a bad virus and how vaccines defang this virus and then let me address transmission one more time. As said
many times, Moderna and Pfizer phase 3 trials were meant to assess the risk of COVID-19 infection with symptoms as they were designed for expediency. So, 1st outcome was 1) do you have any symptoms suggestive of COVID-19, we will swab and see if you have COVID-19? 2nd outcome was
did you get severe disease from COVID-19?. In terms of 1st outcome to look at, 95% of COVID-19 cases with symptoms occurred in people who got placebo, not vaccine. Vaccine massively reduced chance of getting COVID-19 with symptoms. In 2nd outcome, all of the severe COVID-19
cases that occurred across both trials happened in those who got placebo; vaccine seemed to protect from the most severe outcomes 100% (please see former tweets for breakdown and the 1 case in Pfizer marked "severe" but not). So a teacher who is fully vaccinated will be protected
from what they fear most- symptomatic COVID-19 and severe disease (no matter who they are around, children or adults). Okay, now let's address transmission again without controversy. What that means is can you still have SARS-CoV-2 in your nose if you have been vaccinated? e.g.
asymptomatically carry it? The trials were not designed to answer that question but Pfizer/Moderna will be answering that question with post-vaccination swabs of vaccinated individuals -please see answers to CDC here: leadingage.org/regulation/cdc…
Is there some suggestive data that the vaccines will reduce asymptomatic carriage? Pfizer did not look at that question at all in interim phase 3 trial results published in NEJM. Moderna's phase 3 trial design actually did swab before the 2nd dose (without regard to symptoms) so
could assess asymptomatic carriage then and below is the figure from their table (look at supplement) & attached is the paper. There is a 62% risk reduction in having asymptomatic carriage in your nose with getting 1 dose of Moderna vaccine versus placebo: nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
Then you ask- well, if mRNA vaccines stimulate IgG (antibodies measured in trials), T cell and B cell immunity as documented- is there a reason to think that IgG could also help block virus at the mucosal (nose) surface (since IgA is the "immunoglobulin" or antibody that
predominantly mediates mucosal immunity?). Yes, biologic reason to believe serum IgG would help block infection at mucosal surfaces as well- this has been shown with other viruses- some examples here (serum IgG helps block rotavirus): pnas.org/content/102/20…
And IgG (the antibodies measured in those trials) are found in high quantities at mucosal surfaces. Please see this review: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
So, even though we wait those further studies from Pfizer/Moderna (and independent groups, UCSF group putting in grant too) on regular swabbing after vaccines and the recommendation is that vaccinated should mask/distance to protect unvaccinated for now, biological plausibility
of reducing asymptomatic carriage. Finally, back to teachers: even if exposed to virus, they have the vaccination which has rendered the virus toothless so they are safe. I know most teachers are interested in returning which is why teachers were put in Tier 1B for early vax
I hope this paper gets added to the thread about parenteral vaccination also inducing IgA immunity (that is antibody type in mucosal surfaces like noses!) cvi.asm.org/content/23/6/4…
And the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines neutralize even global variants ("UK" and "South Africa") so don't worry there! biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
Here is the Pfizer data on not significant reduction in efficacy against the UK and South Africa variants. We are good here! biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
And then wanted to explain why you should be beaming ear-to-ear about vaccine data. Why would an infection trigger all of this testing, masking, life halting? Because severe illness/hospitalizations/deaths occur. All vaccines to date prevented hospitalizations/deaths completely.
Severe illness prevented completely in Moderna/Pfizer/AztraZeneca trials; 85% across regions (even in South Africa - South Africa variant there) in J&J trials and immune response from 1 dose may keep on giving (remember, outcomes evaluated 14-28 days out due to expediency)
But as I wrote yesterday, immunogenicity from 1 dose of J&J likely extends beyond 14-28 days - keeps on going so likely more protection over time - see graphs in this paper. Two-dose trial still going. Finally, S. Africa variant is one with less protection nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
Know very tempting to feel nervous about variants. Please don't: 1) RNA viruses do mutate and those more fit spread more readily; 2) SARS-CoV-2 has much lower mutational rate than influenza A - we are seeing more because transmission high, want to tamp down (& now sequencing);
3) Vaccines do not generate just antibody response, but T cell responses (measured in all 3 trials published) and B cell responses). So if neutralizing antibodies slightly lower in vaccinated blood to a variant (and not yet lower in clinically significant way), remember T cells.
4) So far, all of these vaccines involve genetic material that code for the spike protein/RBD- mRNA in mRNA vaccines and double-stranded DNA in adenovector vaccines. Sequences of genetic material can be "tweaked" to respond to variants as needed; 5) As tweeted before, efficacy
Wonderful news about the Johnson&Johnson vaccine! Let me explain (and also let me tell you I was just on an interview with Dr. Paul Offit, who believes - like me- that control is nigh). J&J vaccine press release here: jnj.com/johnson-johnso…
J&J vaccine is a modified cold virus adenovirus (this vector doesn't replicate or cause illness in humans) with double stranded DNA coding the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 inside. Nice explanation of NYT of how it works. The adenovirus "vector" (carrier) nytimes.com/interactive/20…
gets the DNA inside host cell nucleus where it is "transcribed" into mRNA and then you make the spike protein of the virus % raise immune response against it. Initial phase I/II data from NEJM showed high immunogenicity of 1st dose that went up over time. nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NE…
Please don't panic too much about these new variants of SARS-CoV-2. Taking a step back, RNA viruses (viruses that use RNA as their genetic material rather than DNA; SARS-CoV is an RNA virus) have higher mutation rates than DNA viruses (like chickenpox). jvi.asm.org/content/92/14/…
Their RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (which replicate the genetic material) do not "proofread" assiduously like DNA polymerases so random mutations occur and those that confer a "fitness advantage" (helps them replicate more efficiently) take off. See this: biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
Mutations that lead to an enhancement of the ability of the spike protein to bind to the host's receptor (the ACE receptor) may be advantageous to the virus. Of 295,507 full-length genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 worldwide, authors looked at mutations affecting that interface and
What about COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy? A question asked often. I think safe but wanted to discuss. I have worked in women & HIV for long time & drugs/vaccines/etc. not studied in pregnant & breastfeeding women despite FDA saying they should fda.gov/media/90160/do…
Similarly, pregnant & breastfeeding women included in Pfizer/Moderna trials (at start) so can't specifically comment on this group. However, these are not "live" vaccines (weakened live virus) which we don't use in pregnant women. mRNA in these vaccines is inert and
degrades very quickly after being "translated" (made) into the spike protein and doesn't stick around. Therefore, this genetic material does NOT stay in your body and should not harm fetus in any way. The spike protein and the immune response you make against it should not harm
Oh dear. I didn't read the post that had incited such confusion on here from a fellow scientist because I think polemics against fellow scientists is unmerited but I am beginning to get a hint that she slandered me (which happened before on a hypothesis our group had that reduced
viral #inoculum reduces severity of disease). I will take a small break from Twitter now as I have so much work. But please remember this. Scientists usually write academically and their "fame" is very circumscribed within academic circles & they usually don't get listened to
by anyone else! So, it is tempting and exciting to become "famous" in a pandemic and be listened to by so many. And any scientist right now is as lonely and miserable as anyone else during COVID-19 because we are all human and connection is a part of human existence. So, that