1) The Larger Impact of the GameStop Investor Wars

"The fundamental issue currently being fought over is who gets to have a role in determining financial value, access and outcome."
theepochtimes.com/the-larger-imp…
2) In some respects, the market has traditionally been seen as the ultimate arena of opportunity and free speech.

We can all invest in companies we deem attractive, and if we’re wrong, the market quickly shows us the error of our ways.
3) But recent events have exposed the extent to which this belief may be unfounded and the manner in which the financial system has been systematically weighted towards certain players, at the expense of others.
4) This time, it’s suddenly different because it’s the retail investors—the little guys—who are doing the pushing.

This time, it’s the hedge funds that got caught offside in this mess.

And now that they’re feeling financial pain, they want to change the rules.
5) But what happens if you allow a small group of individuals or institutions—government figures and regulators, certain hedge funds, and Wall Street investment houses — the power to determine the appropriateness of decisions made in the broader financial markets?
6) This “We know better than you” mentality quickly leads down a path toward greater government influence and determination on which companies are successful and, perhaps more importantly, which industries are successful.
7) Does the government get to decide where and how capital should be allocated?

What if the government doesn’t think a particular company—or a particular industry—deserves funding at all?
8) The fundamental issue currently being fought over is who gets to have a role in determining financial value, access and outcome.

Is it all the participants that make up the market?

Or is it only the entrenched Wall Street players and the government regulators?
9) Instead of placing blame on small investors, we should be looking at the risk management policies of the big hedge funds.

It was their poor risk controls that allowed them to get into this situation.

/End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff Carlson

Jeff Carlson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @themarketswork

24 Jan
1) "Funded by hundreds of millions of dollars from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and other high-tech interests, activist organizations created a two-tiered election system"
assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2042…
2) "Private monies dictated city and county election management contrary to both federal law and state election plans endorsed and developed by state legislatures with authority granted by the United States Constitution."
3) "Executive officials in swing states facilitated, through unique and novel contracts, the sharing of private and sensitive information about citizens within those states with private interests"
Read 15 tweets
8 Jan
1) Lots of politicians talking about the "Sanctity" & "Strength" of our "Institutions".

While failing to acknowledge that for a huge swath of Americans, that faith in those same Institutions has been impaired or destroyed.
2) President Trump didn't create this lack of faith. Nor the anger and distrust.

It has long been there, brewing and gathering strength. Precisely because of actions from those same Institutions.

The reactions from the Media & DC to Trump's term solidified those beliefs.
3) We just learned that the IC downplayed the role of China in the election for political purposes.

"Some of our career people, even CIA management, were politicizing China intelligence”
washingtonexaminer.com/news/intellige…
Read 9 tweets
6 Jan
1) Congress is incentivized to see Pence's role as passive.

But Constitutional scholars differ and/or acknowledge that varying interpretations exist.

Note: I am NOT predicting what Pence will do. I will just be highlighting some ambiguities.

(Apologies - will be long thread)
2) Edward Foley is head of Election Law Dept at Ohio U.

He is Left & originator of Blue Shift theory

What follows are quotes from his "war-game" paper published in the Loyola University Chicago Law Journal - Preparing for a Disputed Presidential Election
lawecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewconten…
3) "As part of an effort to prepare for the risk of a disputed presidential election in 2020, it is imperative to consider how the embarrassingly deficient procedures might operate if they were actually called into play."
Read 25 tweets
5 Jan
“There’s about 16 or 18 of us now that signed this letter to the Vice President … asking him to delay the electoral vote for 10 to 12 days.”

“We were going to get it to him tomorrow morning.”
theepochtimes.com/georgia-state-…
“I think several senators from Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Arizona also wrote letters sent to the Vice President, [telling him] we want the vice president to at least delay it 10 to 12 days.”
Jan 20th is date that matters Constitutionally:

"Terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January"

Pence can, and in my view, should defer.

Allows Audit to proceed. Takes ECA away.

Gives states time to revisit, clarify. With new evidence.
Read 5 tweets
5 Jan
Curious what specific actions Raffensperger took that you see as credible

Judge Totenberg stated repeatedly in ruling that true RLA audits of results using Dominion equipment were inherently not possible.

Ben Adida's (VotingWorks) arguments to contrary were demolished in court.
Raffensperger knew this as he was party to lawsuit. And his general counsel, Ryan Germany, was on at least one critical court hearing.

That didn't stop him from issuing press release celebrating results of RLA as definitive.

Was used by media everywhere.
sos.ga.gov/index.php/elec…
VotingWorks performed the RLA...

Raffensberger also used CISA release on "Election Integrity" at one point to defend Georgia's results.

Despite almost certainly having to know that both Dominion & Pro V&V were part of council that issued statement.
Read 6 tweets
3 Jan
3) …In the morning, new numbers show Trump’s lead starting to slip, and by noon, it is below 20,000. Impatient, Trump holds an impromptu press conference and announces:" Image
4) "So begins the saga over the disputed result of the 2020 presidential election.”

Although familiar, the passage isn’t taken from a recent article describing the Nov. 3, 2020, presidential election. Rather, it comes from a 55-page paper, published on Aug 31, 2019 by Ed Foley.
5) Foley’s paper, more of a Democrat war-game analysis, takes readers on a complicated electoral journey that may well prove to accurately foreshadow events through Jan. 20.

Foley has provided a complicated—but thus far surprisingly accurate—electoral roadmap to be used by Dems.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!