US COVID cases are going down, mostly because the Christmas peak is over. Will it keep down, or will there be another peak?

If we follow the B117 strain, the race with vaccines will be tight. 🧵

It looks like in the US, the B117 strain might represent close to 2% of all cases
If we follow Denmark, it took them ~2-3 weeks to go from there to ~7-8%
In England, it took ~7 more weeks to represent nearly all cases. The heat could be felt within ~4 weeks.
That means the US will see an increasing transmission rate to 60% more in the next 6-10 weeks.
The US has vaccinated ~25M people. At this pace, in 6-10 weeks it will have vaccinated 70-100M people, reducing the transmission rate maybe by 20-40%.
It seems like the critical factor will be how much people lower their guard in the next few weeks and how fast we can get the vaccine out.

Our fate is in our hands.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tomas Pueyo

Tomas Pueyo Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tomaspueyo

29 Jan
I introduce the "Scary Virus Paradox":
"After clearing a threshold, the less deadly a virus is, the more it will kill."
(Deadliness here defined as R0 * IFR)
(log-log graph)

This is obviously caused by society's reaction: the deadlier a virus, the scarier, and the more society acts in unison against it, like for Ebola or SARS.

Nobody cares (cared?) about the flu, so it kills ~350k ppl a year.
Measles antivaxxers, covidiots, antimaskers and the like are therefore a predictable reaction to a virus' deadliness.
Read 7 tweets
25 Jan
Here's a step-by-step take on the assertions of @MartinKulldorff (of the Great Barrington Declaration) criticizing #ZeroCovid
1. Disrespectful and polarizing
He calls us "lockdowners" as if he was trying to demean us. That does not sound like a productive way to have a fact-driven conversation (which he claims to support).
2. His understanding of what he criticizes is shallow.
I'm not a "lockdowner". I hate lockdowns. They have a very specific use in some cases, but Western countries have used them nilly-willy. Their failure was to not use the right tools (fences, test-trace-isolate..)
Read 21 tweets
22 Jan
What does potent mean? It looks like it has higher infectiousness and is deadlier.


What countries turned around their strategy?
Several. My favorite is Singapore:
It failed with its Fences and its test-trace-isolate programs in dormitories, but updated them and was able to control the virus

Read 4 tweets
22 Jan
The new strain, B117, is probably 30% to 90% deadlier.

thesun.co.uk/news/politics/…
The peak of deaths in the UK is higher than in March-April
Read 6 tweets
19 Jan
The hopes that QAnon will disappear with Biden’s inauguration will unfortunately be dashed.

Some followers will decamp. But a lot will be hardened.

How did we get here? What will happen? Why? And what can we do about it?
A🧵about cults & persuasion
The best lens to understand QAnon is as a cult: The 1st massive one to be born fully through social media. It is designed for Persuasion, and uses the best tools from cults.
1. Consistency
If you know a bit about Persuasion, you’ll recognize Consistency at play: Once ppl are down a path, they want to keep walking it. That’s why ppl stay in relationships or jobs they hate, for example.

influenceatwork.com/principles-of-…
Read 20 tweets
13 Jan
How long have you thought about picking the right company to work at? Probably not much.

That's a critical mistake. You're probably making many like this.

The time spent analyzing your options should be proportional to how expensive they are.

Time for a 🧵 on decision-making.
You might have suffered paralysis by analysis, or made decisions too rashly. What's the right balance of time needed to analyze your options?

Some ppl find a house, fall in love, and buy it on the spot. Bad.

Some spend hours comparing small items online to pick the best. Bad.
A company might make a 10-slide deck for a million-dollar decision, and a 100 slide deck to describe a process. Bad.

A company might spend months analyzing which one of 5 options to tackle, when in fact tackling them all could have only taken 4 months. Bad.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!