Buoyed by their success in assailing Wall Street hedge funds, the legion of retail investors who are part of the Wall Street Bets movement #WSB have turned their attention to the silver market.

Silver futures are already up 9%. How is this going to end?

Time for a thread 👇
Unlike GameStop ($gme) which is worth billions, the above ground silver market is worth almost 1.5 Trillion (2018 estimate). This is not to mention the massive derivatives market on top of the silver spot market. A short squeeze will be much harder to achieve, so why bother? 👇
It is believed that the silver market is highly manipulated by Wall Street and that the market is shorted by many factors more than actual silver that exists above ground. By trying to corner silver, especially physical, #WSB hopes to explode Wall Street's machinations.
In the late 70s the Hunt brothers (Nelson, William and Lamar) began an operation to corner the silver market and their attempt is instructive to anyone trying the same thing today. Let's explore how it went 👇
Like today, the Federal Reserve pursued a policy of monetary expansion in the 70s, a decade which saw high single digit inflation, peaking at 13.5% in 1980. Ostensibly, the Hunt brothers, among America's wealthiest at the time, were cornering silver to protect their savings.
Unlike the Wall Street Bets movement today, however, the Hunt brothers did not have popular opinion on their side. in 1980, the jeweler Tiffany's took an ad in the New York Times condemning the Hunt brothers for causing regular buyers of jewelry to pay "artificially high prices"
As the Hunt brothers accumulated silver, demanding physical delivery (they sent their silver stash to Switzerland) the price of the precious metal went parabolic. To increase their position with leverage the brothers bought more silver in the futures market.
The Hunt's plan backfired; The commodities exchange COMEX decide to limit the amount of silver that could be purchased with futures on their exchange, reminiscent of the actions of various brokers preventing purchases of GameStock in recent days.
Futher, as the price rose, physical silver materialized from many sources as people melted down old cutlery, silver dimes and quarters. Cornering the market became increasingly difficult and the price of silver began to drop, culminating in "Silver Thursday" (March 27, 1980)
With their silver future contracts deeply underwater the Hunt brothers faced a margin call for $100m and a total nominal loss of $1.7billion. The commodities market immediately went into a panic. An emergency loan from a consortium of banks averted a complete collapse.
The moral of the story is that the silver market is not an easy one to manipulate even for the world's richest and even in an environment that is macroeconomically very conducive to a bull run in silver.

Retail investors attempting to corner silver today should be circumspect.
I will end with a note that I believe that people who are part of the Wall Street Bets movement have the right motivations (angst against the status quo financial system), but they have chosen the wrong vessel to carry their hopes.

Our one hope for real change is #Bitcoin.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vijay Boyapati

Vijay Boyapati Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @real_vijay

30 Jan
@RayDalio is one of the great investors of our time and he has begun thinking about #Bitcoin. He penned a thoughtful piece on his concerns about Bitcoin and was hoping to get responses, point-by-point.

Ray, here are my responses to your points (screenshotted) in a thread: 👇
Never in the history of the world had it been possible to transfer value between distant peoples without relying on a trusted intermediary, such as a bank or government - until 2009, with the invention of #Bitcoin.

You are correct in your summation of its significance, Ray.
You ask what demand could #Bitcoin have and this is a deep question. It's not a complete answer but I will refer you to a thread on valuation frameworks for Bitcoin that I previously wrote:

Read 29 tweets
19 Nov 20
In the global family of financial assets, gold is #Bitcoin's closest cousin. They are both non-sovereign monetary goods valued for their superior monetary properties (relative to fiat).

However, the ownership distribution of these close cousins is very different. A thread👇
A very large fraction of gold is owned as jewelry (dominated by India) and (ironically) by global central banks. Investment usage in the form of bullion is the next dominant usage and this, in turn, comes in large part through demand from gold ETFs such as SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). ImageImage
Much of the jewelry demand for gold is actually use as an ostentatious store-of-value. This is particularly so in India.

However, outside of India, there is very little retail demand for gold as a store of value, especially among younger savers in Western nations (millennials). Image
Read 11 tweets
18 Nov 20
At this stage in the 2016 #bitcoin bull market cycle, the price dropped about 29%, which in today's terms would be a fall to a bit below $13,000.

Is it possible we have a correction like this before taking the all time high? Yes.

However...
This cycle is clearly being driven more by institutions who generally have much stronger hands than retail buyers.

For instance MicroStrategy has stated their purchase of #Bitcoin is a long term allocation - those bitcoins have been taken off the order book indefinitely.
The larger institutional interest may help dampen volatility in this cycle. Institutions are not looking at #Bitcoin to seek returns of 10 or 20%. They're looking for an asymmetric bet. When they take a position they're looking for 10 or 20x upside. They are also patient.
Read 4 tweets
10 Nov 20
There are four main valuation frameworks for #Bitcoin and I wanted to summarize them with a target valuation that one would assign if one subscribed to that framework.

Thread 👇
1) Bitcoin's rise is equivalent to the Tulip Mania. It has no real comparative advantage to any existing monetary good or to the current fiat monetary system and is a bubble that will eventually pop.

Long term target price: $0.
2) Bitcoin is a new monetary technology whose appeal is largely limited to technologically savvy and libertarian minded people who can tolerate its volatility, which will be a permanent feature of its existence going forward.

Long term target price: $10,000 - $100,000
Read 7 tweets
15 Oct 20
1/ @Facebook, @Twitter and @Google have all built internal tools to implement systematic censorship. The tools are little different to the tools used by China's authoritarian government. They may not be used as frequently (yet) but they are no less chilling.
2/ Large tech companies have been complicit in censorship for a long time. When I was at Google I was asked to implement tools to censor news in China

3/ As Silicon Valley's largest companies replace legacy media as the primary gateway for information dissemination they have become dangerously powerful in shaping what can and can't be said online.
Read 6 tweets
27 Jul 20
1/ Bitcoin and gold are on the rise. A thread explaining why.

All monetary goods are in constant competition with each other to attract the pool of global savings. They compete primarily on the attributes that make for a good store of value:

medium.com/@vijayboyapati…
2/ Fiat monies, while being inferior on the standard attributes that make for a good store of value, have one advantage over market based monies: you are paid interest to hold them. This interest can be paid because the sovereign claims seigniorage over their money.
3/ In effect, a state can pay interest on the money it issues because it parasitically profits from the productivity of the population over which it claims dominion. States also use the interest rate in a counterproductive attempt to keep their national economies growing.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!