X : Who uses your maps?
Me : Different people and groups. It's creative commons, so there are no restrictions.
X : So, you don't know?
Me : People do tell me, it's in books etc. If they find it useful, it'll spread. If not, it doesn't deserve to.
X : But who?
Me : Shopify?
X : But who else?
Me : All sorts of people. Why?
X : I need an example from my industry.
Me : Ah, if someone we know does this then we should do this? The 67% of generals bomb hills problem?
X : ?
Me : You shouldn't map because others do, you should map if you find it useful. That's it.
X : But we want to know if it will be useful.
Me : Certainty before you try and explore an uncertain space you have little visiblity on? Try it for a day, if it doesn't help ... stop.
X : We're thinking of building a platform, will it help with this?
Me : Are you thinking of building a platform because you read in some HBR article about other people building platforms?
X : Why does that matter?
Me : My heart sinks ...
... building a platform should be the end result of an understanding of your landscape, application of thought and a decision to play a certain type of game. You don't start with "let's build a platform" and then look for justification to your decision ...
... If you think maps are a tool to help you confirm what you've already decided then you misunderstand them. They're a mechanism to enable communication, challenge and learning based upon a premise that it's a good idea to look before you leap.
X : Can you prove that?
Me : Can I prove that looking at the landscape is useful? That situational awareness matters?
X : Yes
Me : No and that's not for me to do. There are other people looking into that question ... see @RoserPujadas1
X : But you say that most of the economy runs on luck.
Me : There are outliers but most of us are playing a game blind chess. We don't even understand the board or the pieces.
X : So, any effect from maps could be luck?
Me : It could be. That's why I can't answer the question.
X : But how do you know if your map is right?
Me : All maps are wrong and imperfect by nature.
X : So, I don't see the point of them.
Me : That's ok. You should only use them if you find them useful.
X : So, you don't know who uses them, you can't tell me the impact and they're wrong and imperfect - that's your pitch?
Me : Minus the pitch. It's all creative commons.
X : And the only reason why I should use them is I find them useful.
Me : Yep.
X : Mapping works on FOMO?
Me : Well, I think it's reasonable to say that some look at mapping because of that. Which is why you quickly need to work out whether it's useful to you or not.
X : How do you do that?
Me : Try it and compare to what you already use.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
X : We want to be agile.
Me : Do you mean "We want to learn Agile methods such as XP" or "We want to increase the agility of our organisation"?
X : Is there a difference?
Me : Huge. Agile is a method whilst Agility comes from many things including applying appropriate methods.
X : Many things?
Me : Yes. Here's a handy table of universally useful patterns. Do all of these and you'll have more agility as an organisation.
X : That means Agile?
Me : You may well be using XP in some places and SCRUM etc.
X : Surely it's simpler to just use Agile everywhere?
Me : That won't bring you agility, it'll bring you frustration, inefficiency and a mess.
The Tao (the way, the purpose)
The Earth (the terrain, the landscape)
The Heaven (the seasons, the climate)
The Laws (the doctrine)
The General (the leadership)
I'd just like to make the point, that mapping the landscape is not a "technology" activity ... mapping is useful in any competitive space whether economics, nation state play, scientific knowledge or cultural systems.
So, when you tell me that you're on the "business" side, what you're actually telling me is "I'm in a business that doesn't understand or learn from our landscape".
I don't know if that is bravado or supposed to impress me because I just think you're muppets for the taking.
X : Are you an online troll?
Me : Five minutes ago I was a ghoul.
X : Nope, you've lost me.
Me : I was playing Dungeon & Dragons with the wee lad and my better half.
X : Console?
Me : Yep, it was a shock to the wife. Old paper version, great fun and even the wee lad loved it.
X : AD&D
Me : No, 1977 classic ... original set. It's not about the rules, it's about the atmosphere you create.
X : You have an original box set?
Me : Oh yes. Still love the game.
X : You're the dungeon master?
Me : Of course. It's like the theatre of Werewolf but more fun.
.... tunnels and trolls, traveller ... I've got a lot of old games. It's more fun than films or PC games - press button, press other button, fire, press button, bleep, bleep noise ... at least you can add humour with paper and a bit of imagination.
X : Thoughts on getting back into the office?
Me : Go buy a bunch of Double Robotics Teleprescence systems - doublerobotics.com - then people can "zoom" into the robot and you can all bump into each other around the board room.
X : That's ridiculous
Me : Ok ...
... make sure the CEO gets a gold plated one, so you can re-assert status in your virtual world hybrid.
X : Now, you're being silly.
Me : Ok, ask yourself "Why do we need an office?" and more importantly "Who is pushing for a return to the office and why?"
X : And?
Me : I mentioned this last year. A lot of the push to get back into the office comes from issues related to power - social prescence, status symbols - and not necessarily what is good for people or productivity. I'd focus on supporting people in this remote world.
X : When is #mapcamp happening this year?
Me : Wed, Oct 13th.
X : What's the plan?
Me : Right now? Find some funding.
X : How much do you need?
Me : For a 1500 - 3000 person online event? Back of envelope calculation ... about £50k to make it happen. LEF has kindly sponsored it for the last few years but we now need to stand it up on its own two feet.
X : What does that mean?
Me : Like all events, it's a risk profile. So, today the chance of #mapcamp happening is 0%, as we raise some funds, identify costs and find ways of reducing costs etc then that chance increases to a point that we can say ... yep, we can do this.
X : What interests you in technology today?
Me : Lots of things? Do you mean companies?
X : Besides Amazon?
Me : Oodles. What are you after?
X : Something different?
Me : Try Feenk - feenk.com - and the Glamorous Toolkit underneath this - gtoolkit.com
X : Why them?
Me : Well, I happen to know @girba, we talk about what he is doing. The core area he is tackling is in observability of systems, GT is the underlying platform for this ... these are huge problems he is dealing with. It's a very interesting space.
X : Why?
Me : Well, what % of massive transformations do you think take place without a real understanding of the systems in place?
X : 5%?
Me : I'd guess it's the same as the number of crisis that occur because we don't understand our tech landscape.
X : 10%?
Me : 99%?