X : Thoughts on getting back into the office?
Me : Go buy a bunch of Double Robotics Teleprescence systems - doublerobotics.com - then people can "zoom" into the robot and you can all bump into each other around the board room.
X : That's ridiculous
Me : Ok ...
... make sure the CEO gets a gold plated one, so you can re-assert status in your virtual world hybrid.
X : Now, you're being silly.
Me : Ok, ask yourself "Why do we need an office?" and more importantly "Who is pushing for a return to the office and why?"
X : And?
Me : I mentioned this last year. A lot of the push to get back into the office comes from issues related to power - social prescence, status symbols - and not necessarily what is good for people or productivity. I'd focus on supporting people in this remote world.
X : Do you think this virtual world is permanent.
Me : Too late. Practices have started to emerge which mean the economy is not going back to what it was and you'll have to adapt. Signs of what is emerging can be found from practioner led education to GameStop ...
... which means on a national scale, we need to really push on the support structures and start tackling issues related to inequality. You need to be thinking "When are we implementing UBI" not if.
X : What's the alternative?
Me : Start zoming into robots in the board room until you really realise that "this is silly" rather than just saying it.
X : Some work can't be remote.
Me : There are all sorts of reasons why an office or a factory are needed but last time I looked, I think it was about 70% (in education) to 30% (engineering) of the economy could be done remotely. We have more changes coming e.g. humanless delivery
... these changes however are not new, they have been building ... the isolation economy (caused by covid) is simply the accelerant. Many have been caught by the change but it would have happened anyway over a longer time (and companies still would have been caught out) ...
... it's like the economic crash of 2008. Everyone I knew in banking thought a crash was coming, they just expected it to be later i.e. after a few bonuses. That was the real shock. Ditto what's happening. I expect many execs thought the change would happen after they retired.
X : You still need people to build things.
Me : Hmmm. Within 10 years, given the speed at which we're industrialising launchers, ground stations and components in the robotics field ... expect us to start manufacturing in space. You really think it's going to be humans building?
X : 10 years?
Me : To start. Then another 20-30 years to become more commodity like and another 10-15 years to become the norm for new components. 55 years roughly. There are many people born today who will witness the decline of terrestrial manufacturing.
X : That's a long timeline.
Me : Not if you're a Government. Things like HS2 (high speed rail) have to think about 80 year timeframes. Nae man can tether time or tide. Things will change.
X : Space Factories?
Me : Yep, the components are getting there. The whole space of space will just heat up and there will be some friction - mining.com/experts-warn-o…
X : Components?
Me : Launchers, Ground Stations, Robotic OS, ML Engines, Sensors (including LIDAR) ... you need a whole bunch of things to industrialise and that's going on.
X : How do you know this?
Me : You can't predict the future with certainty but try mapping.
X : How can you know?
Me : The future? You can't but you can cheat a bit.
X : Explain.
Me : There are four things to consider - the known known, the known unknown, the unknown unknown and the largest impact of all ... the unknown known.
X : The unknown known?
Me : Yep ...
... the things we don't know that we actually do know ... normally because we can't tie the pieces together.
X : Example.
Me : Alphafold. For me, a classic example of the unknown known, it was all there we just didn't know how to put it together. Brilliant stuff btw.
X : Why the largest impact?
Me : It's everywhere. The are so many things which we have all the pieces for but we just can't tie them together. There is going to be a lot of interesting work in that space.
X : So, what has this got to do with predicting the future?
Me : Ah, it's amazing when you map, how people put different components into play and someone goes ... "hang on, given this then ..."
Happens all the time, usually followed by "God that was obvious, why didn't we see it". Communication, challenge and diversity works wonders.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
X : Thoughts on China is coming due for a counterculture revolution ala the 60s here?
Me : If we think about the balance of "Me vs We" in a culture then ...
... I suspect we're in danger of applying the cultural norms of our collective to another collective and assuming it will react as our collective has reacted. We are probably being myopic ...
... as an alternative, China may well tackle issues of inequality whilst simultaneously growing a more vibrant and meritocratic economy. Rather than a counterculture in the East, a counterculture in the West (against the systemic inequality) seems to be something we're ignoring.
X : We want to be agile.
Me : Do you mean "We want to learn Agile methods such as XP" or "We want to increase the agility of our organisation"?
X : Is there a difference?
Me : Huge. Agile is a method whilst Agility comes from many things including applying appropriate methods.
X : Many things?
Me : Yes. Here's a handy table of universally useful patterns. Do all of these and you'll have more agility as an organisation.
X : That means Agile?
Me : You may well be using XP in some places and SCRUM etc.
X : Surely it's simpler to just use Agile everywhere?
Me : That won't bring you agility, it'll bring you frustration, inefficiency and a mess.
The Tao (the way, the purpose)
The Earth (the terrain, the landscape)
The Heaven (the seasons, the climate)
The Laws (the doctrine)
The General (the leadership)
I'd just like to make the point, that mapping the landscape is not a "technology" activity ... mapping is useful in any competitive space whether economics, nation state play, scientific knowledge or cultural systems.
So, when you tell me that you're on the "business" side, what you're actually telling me is "I'm in a business that doesn't understand or learn from our landscape".
I don't know if that is bravado or supposed to impress me because I just think you're muppets for the taking.
X : Are you an online troll?
Me : Five minutes ago I was a ghoul.
X : Nope, you've lost me.
Me : I was playing Dungeon & Dragons with the wee lad and my better half.
X : Console?
Me : Yep, it was a shock to the wife. Old paper version, great fun and even the wee lad loved it.
X : AD&D
Me : No, 1977 classic ... original set. It's not about the rules, it's about the atmosphere you create.
X : You have an original box set?
Me : Oh yes. Still love the game.
X : You're the dungeon master?
Me : Of course. It's like the theatre of Werewolf but more fun.
.... tunnels and trolls, traveller ... I've got a lot of old games. It's more fun than films or PC games - press button, press other button, fire, press button, bleep, bleep noise ... at least you can add humour with paper and a bit of imagination.
X : When is #mapcamp happening this year?
Me : Wed, Oct 13th.
X : What's the plan?
Me : Right now? Find some funding.
X : How much do you need?
Me : For a 1500 - 3000 person online event? Back of envelope calculation ... about £50k to make it happen. LEF has kindly sponsored it for the last few years but we now need to stand it up on its own two feet.
X : What does that mean?
Me : Like all events, it's a risk profile. So, today the chance of #mapcamp happening is 0%, as we raise some funds, identify costs and find ways of reducing costs etc then that chance increases to a point that we can say ... yep, we can do this.
X : Who uses your maps?
Me : Different people and groups. It's creative commons, so there are no restrictions.
X : So, you don't know?
Me : People do tell me, it's in books etc. If they find it useful, it'll spread. If not, it doesn't deserve to.
X : But who?
Me : Shopify?
X : But who else?
Me : All sorts of people. Why?
X : I need an example from my industry.
Me : Ah, if someone we know does this then we should do this? The 67% of generals bomb hills problem?
X : ?
Me : You shouldn't map because others do, you should map if you find it useful. That's it.
X : But we want to know if it will be useful.
Me : Certainty before you try and explore an uncertain space you have little visiblity on? Try it for a day, if it doesn't help ... stop.