🦠19202 new cases but they now count LFT test positives in this number without PCR confirmation
More later
⚰️⚰️⚰️ 1322 (28 day cut off deaths). 1506 (60 day, +ve test & Covid on death certificate)
⚰️💔⚰️💔 126,755 Covid deaths in total - NB an undercount due to notification lag
Tests processed now include HUGE numbers of LFT
2,268,940 in the last 7 days in England
These have a lower sensitivity rate (returning high false negatives) than PCR yet are now lumped in with the positives, without PCR confirmation
It’s the false negatives that are the problem
Positivity rates are calculated from PCR tests only
But lab based PCR tests processed for P1 and P2 are falling.
So is the reducing Positivity due to people not bothering with PCR test now in much larger numbers, relying on a less sensitive LFT?
We have no segregated data for LFT positivity on the dashboard.
No negative data. No unclears. No context (how many Liverpool style community screening, how many repeat HCW repeat screening, repeat care homes and care worker screening, schools.
Nothing on region/ locality
So is the drop in positives due to a change in testing or because rates are really falling comparatively?
Which is why it was ALWAYS important that the data should have been segregated and reported on in a granular fashion
Then there’s a chance of comparing apples with apples
🏥 in patients, admissions and ventilation bed occupation are all falling, mostly due to downward numbers in England.
How much of this is lockdown and how much vaccination effect?
It would be very useful to have an interim vaccination surveillance report.
What we do have is the ONS antibody surveillance that shows a substantial increase in seroprevalence in the month ending 18/1/21 . This does not include care home or hospitals.
In particular a big increase in the over 80s..& remember it takes a couple of weeks or more to work
The Pandemic Broke the Flu
One lab
In 2 months thousands of tests have turned up +ve for covid - But the tally for the flu has held constant. The lab has run 20,000 flu tests—10 times as many as it processed the season before—zero have come back positive theatlantic.com/science/archiv…
The same baffling trend is repeating itself nationwide, and around the globe. While the coronavirus has surged, the flu and other respiratory viruses have flickered out.
It’s been the same in England.
Since early fall, about 800k lab samples have been tested in the US for the flu & reported to the CDC, and only 1,500 or so have come up positive—a mere 0.2 percent. This time last year, close to 100 times as many flu cases had been identified from nearly the same number of tests
@dgurdasani1 I’m going to tell you a story because you go to a lot of trouble explaining the sources of the evidence as you understand it, identify where there is uncertainty and spell out where you think the evidence is pointing.
@dgurdasani1 Firstly. What you do is both generous in explanation and links to evidence.
And it is brave when others who may be more senior bring their seniority to bear rather than engage in specific details on the particular evidence as an intellectual equal.
@dgurdasani1 When I was a young (and very tiny 7st 7lb) advocate a case came my way that was legally very difficult. Ripping off senile old people - many of their life savings - by offering building and decorating “services” that devalued their properties and grossly overcharged them for it.
🦠 16,840 cases continuing the downward trend (but remember how quickly that exploded from a lower number at the end of the December lock down)
⚰️⚰️⚰️. 1449 (28 day deaths)
⚰️💔 117,378 ONS Stats authority deaths to 22/1/21
⚰️💔⚰️💔 125,223 COVID DEATHS total - an undercount.
Why am I also sure there is an undercount?
Firstly there is a settled pattern in delayed notifications evident from checking deaths by date of death over a period of time. They tick up over a period of two - three weeks.
Secondly if you check the death numbers for 28 day deaths by date of death (eg circled in green) there were 1150 deaths on 22/1/21. The Stats authorities had only been notified of 760 of them
Instead of engaging with the reality of Covid-19 and the societies which it is ravaging “they have simply used a familiar critique of the politicisation of health and the growth of a culture of fear as a script for explaining the reception of a new virus in new times. “
Neither medical science nor social analysis is sacred
But taking the measure of bureaucratic impositions like lockdowns requires something more too: it requires a moral compass. Government ministers abdicate responsibility for their policies by claiming they ‘follow’ the science