1/ Selling when you are down is THE way to lose money because you have no chance to earn anything back if things rise.
When I am down steep on a stock, I buy more. This brings down my average buy price; losses start to recover sooner and it can turn profitable sooner too.
I moved into $MJ at $30. Then at $20. Then at $10.50.
My average buy price dropped to $17.00
It crashed to under $9.
Then it rose, and rose and rose. It hit today $23.88.
Losses long recovered. Gains are here too.
3/ Newcomers’ mistakes don’t start with selling when down.
The mistake starts by chasing stocks on the upswing (I did not touch #GME), and another mistake is buying their full hand at the start. I place only 40% of my would-be hand. If it rises, great. If it crashes, I buy more.
Oops. This is another newcomer mistake: Making confident predictions about the direction of securities. Not good. Be humble.
But let me address it anyway. When #KODK popped in August 2020 to $60 I waited for the moment to pounce.
5/ When it crashed, I bought at $16.32 and stuck to my rule of not going in with a full hand no matter how sure I am that a stock will rise. I used the rest $ to but more all the down at $6.80.
It never regained $16.32 but I sold them all it at a 19% gain.
6/ Selling a stock within a year of buying it is taxed as income whereas holding it more than a year has capital gains rates.
From a tax point it is dumb to sell quick, but from a trade perspective a stock that I was down 58% from my initial buy, turned into a 19% profit.
This thread - addressing @stoolpresidente - was posted Feb 3d when $GME was at $92; down from $400+ days earlier. The stock then plunged to under $50 and today it hit $190 in after-hours. So... if you violated the rule of jumping onto a stock that’s wild and still bought at $250,
you would have bought at certain drop levels all the way down to as low as $68. This would lower your average buy price well below the level where the stock was today. You would be up now with a gain of 20%.
“But Yossi, why would anyone think that the stock would recover from >
the recent low of sub-$50?”
Good question but why did you not ask it when $GME was at $250? As far as I am concerned, don’t bother with such stocks in the first place but if you do, prepare limit orders on the way down (and prep sell orders on the way up). cc @stoolpresidente
10/ BTW I bought two “Reddit stocks” but only after they had plunged.
In one, am BH up 183% among the sold shares; up 68% in the shares that I still have.
In the other, I am up 75% in realized gains, and up 22% in the unrealized ones.
I NEVER sell on the way down. Dave did.
No, I don’t have the recipe for great stock market success. But...
Jumping into a stock when it’s midstream upwards (rather than buying when it has a pullback)? Stupid!
Putting all money into the first buy? Stupid!
Selling when you are anyway way down? Stupid!
Dave did all 3.
12/ Yesterday when $GME was in the $250 range, @stoolpresidente decided to jump back into it.
Did so after leaving in early Feb on its way down below $100.
I hope he reads this thread.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People have often rejected the claim that election fraud ("mistakes & errors") occurred in 2020 in the 100s or in the 1000s; which is a huge sum considering that states are often very narrowly decided.
Let's look at GA.
2/ Do date, Biden officially won GA by 11,709 votes which is a 0.23% margin among the 4.93 million votes.
How narrow is a 0.23% margin?
Well, let's read what the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) wrote on Nov 19, 2020 following a statewide manual recount:
3/ "No county had an error rate higher than 0.73% compared to their original results" in a state decided by 0.23%
If a manual, rushed recount uncovered in one place an error rate larger than the state's margin of victory, what would a thorough investigation statewide find?
I told you
I told you
I told you
I told you
I told you
PANTS PISSING Cons ran for the hills about the debate due to some fake mediaaa expectations and because, well, they are pants pissers.
👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼
The main attack by Harris was that Trump is a danger, unprepared and a joke to lead the country, yet 54% in the instant CNN poll have confidence in both candidates' ability to run the US, and Trump LEADS by 4 among those who have "a lot of confidence."
Her main attack FAILED!
While the main Harris attack (Orange Man Bad) failed miserably as seen in the poll results above, Trump connected Harris to the Biden Mess so effectively that Harris begged him to stop ("you are not running against Biden") and Trump indeed GAINED a net 4 on the economy:
1/ Biden-Harris admitted into the US 5.6 mill undocumented immigrants and millions more are not in the count, yet the @HouseGOP is too scared to dare Dems to shut the government to keep this mess going.
Instead, Republicans blame themselves by saying "we are not shutting down."
2/ If Republicans can't hold the line against something to the Radical Left of Dems from a mere 10 years ago, why run/win?
Where are the supposed principles?
Even IF holding the line here (and on impeachment) "costs" Republicans, well, gotta put Country Over Party. No?
3/ Republicans made immigration a big issue in #NY03 yet lost big time in the Special in part because voters don't see @HouseGOP as the fix to this problem.
Generic Ballot sucks for the GOP now too. Is it because the GOP is too harsh on this crisis? No. It's the opposite!
Below is the first Tweet-share by @RashidaTlaib since the news that Hamas, a government whose lies she spreads on speed dial, executed an American. No other tweet or tweet share as of now; 36 hours after the news broke.
Obviously, it is the opinion of @RashidaTlaib (and/or the opinion of many of her voters) that Hamas had a 'legitimate context' to execute an American last week or else she would easily tweet against it as she does to echo lies by Hamas.
@RepRashida @RashidaTlaib I am not outraged by Tlaib's lack of outrage on the execution of an American.
I am pointing it out so that people understand the poisonously-depraved world view of her "cause."
If she, a US-born & Elected Official is this depraved, imagine the views by those on the lower rungs.
Blame Corporate/Regime Media for propping up a dead economy; for hyping bad reports as good which impacted the thinking of Fed officials that with inflation not yet settled, the economy can absorb continued high rates.
When the economy was in recession in 2022 (two net negative quarters of GDP; meaning by the end of the second quarter the economy was smaller than before the first), we were gaslit that this isn't a recession. The term was changed in real time like in 1984 propaganda fashion.
As a result of the propaganda, consumers kept spending and the economy recovered; underpinned by federal spending, not by a "real" economy. Then, part time jobs gains at the place of full time ones were sold as all in the same; feeding the hype of a "good" economy.