James Caspian @jamesfreespeech is applying to the European Court of Human Rights for a hearing of his case against Bath Spa University for preventing his research into #detransitioners.
“Some of the people I spoke to said they were too traumatised to speak about their experiences, which proved it was even more important to research the issue, not less."
“I was astonished therefore that a university could censor a research project on the grounds that what people ‘might’ post on social media may be detrimental to the reputation of the university.”
“If a university - a place for the exchange of ideas, discussion, dissent, questioning, research and critical thinking - is unable to tolerate the risk of criticism, where then are left the most basic tenets of academic and intellectual freedom of enquiry?"
“The implications for a democratic society of the suppression of information and discussion are deeply worrying."
“I have felt morally obliged to speak out because people are telling me that they’ve been harmed, and my profession should do no harm..."
“...People are self-censoring, not only speech, but their thoughts on this issue, and that is what this case has to challenge and ultimately help change.”
Please continue to support James Caspian's case which goes to the heart of academic freedom. Research on those who regret medical transition is desperately needed but is being censored out of fear of the trans lobby. @jamesfreespeech #detransitioners crowdjustice.com/case/free-spee…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the UK we have a good number of wise, thoughtful and experienced clinicians, psychologists and psychiatrists researching and writing on gender dysphoria in children and young people. Imagine if the GIDS model of care had been developed by the following professionals.
Thread.
In March 2018 Margaret McCartney wrote this for the BMJ. Back then you didn't see even cautious pieces like this.
"Yet playing with dolls and liking dresses doesn’t make children female, just as playing with trucks and liking mud doesn’t make them male."
A judicial review is a legal course of action whereby someone can challenge a decision of a public body on the grounds that it is unfair, illegal or irrational. Court doesn't look at the merits, but the process and legality of the policy.
Issue at heart of the case was consent, whether informed consent in the legal sense can be given. Court found children under the age of 18 do not have capacity to give informed consent, children under 13 never, older children need to apply to court of protection.
Now it's time for Feminist Perspectives. We have Susan Matthews chairing and speakers Selina Todd @selina_todd, Vaishnavi Sundar talking about erosion of women's rights in India, and Ziggy Melamed. #DoNotAdjustYourSet2021
Selina Todd now on Ideology and Academia. We are in a state where there is a great deal of fear around raising questions in UK universities, in relation to women as a sex. Threats, de-platforming, accusations of transphobia. Institutional policies strengthen their hand.
The attack is mainly on women, reflecting the misogyny of the movement and this can be interpreted as an attack on 2nd wave feminism, a backlash. How did those attacks come about and what does it mean for women in academia?
We require a shared sense of reality. What happens when we abandon this shared sense of reality? When we become unmoored from reality?
Lisa tells the story of Maya, a detransitioner. At 14 Maya announced to her mother she was trans, after looking online. It's a fairly typical story. Testosterone was offered at first appt, Maya dropped out of college, mental health deteriorated, hospitalised twice. Stopped T.
David Bell in his introduction is talking about the difficulty of talking about this subject because of accusations of transphobia and how this culture of silencing has impacted children. Highly politicised groups have managed to influence the GIDS.
500 attendees at this conference today. David Pilgrim introduces @brunskellevans. Brunskell-Evans is talking about the institutional capture of the medical profession: the CQC and Tavistock & Portman NHS Trust are both members of the Stonewall Diversity Champions scheme.
On what evidential grounds can a barrister in court claim that a 10 year old can consent to treatment that will leave her infertile with life-long consequences she cannot possibly understand?
Here is the Transgender Trend submission to WESC. From Director @cwknews on behalf of all our supporters: "I argue that education and policy for children and young people must be grounded in objective reality as a matter of children’s human rights." committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidenc…
Other submissions show why our role is so important. Across the board, an adult activist model has been unquestioningly transferred onto children and young people. The lack of curiosity as to why so many children are suddenly identifying as 'transgender' is astounding.
Bernado's wants children under the age of 16 to be able 'self determine their gender' so they can be supported to live as 'who they are.' They want mandatory training in 'gender identity' for children’s social care, health professionals & school staff. committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidenc…