As we all watch Hindu nationalists burn effigies of foreign women...

It seems a relevant moment to bring up a light change, made on a legal advice, to The Language of History (my most recent book). Take a look for yourself. I had to take out "Hindutva" here to publish in India:
Background knowledge --

India censors stuff all the time -- books, movies, news, etc. This isn't new, but it has ramped up with the BJP in power since 2014. They use colonial-era laws that were designed to restrict Indian freedoms and extrajudicial means (e.g., violence).
Largely because of a high-profile lawsuit concerning an academic book in India several years ago, publishers now act with caution.
In my case, this has meant that all 3 of my books have been subject to a legal read prior to publication in India. The lawyer recommends changes, both to comply with good-faith and bad-faith applications of Indian law and also to avoid threats of violence.
Let's pause and appreciate how extraordinary this is.

In the United States, the idea that a lawyer would need to vet an academic's publications on premodern India... well, it's laughable. I remain enraged that the Indian government treats its own citizens this way.
I wrote about the censorship of my book on Aurangzeb here. I actually had to take out historical information there about Shivaji (which is, ironically, largely included in The Language of History)... censorship can be haphazard. historytoday.com/history-matter…
For anyone wondering -- the self-censorship of The Language of History is light; it isn't worth paying more for the US/Worldwide edition (unless you like maps, which the Indian government really does not).

But I found it notable that a key issue was talking about #Hindutva.
A reminder: Hindutva is a hateful ideology, a type of ethno-nationalism; it is distinct from Hinduism, a diverse religion.

Criticizing Hindutva is beyond fair game, it is the right thing to do given the intolerance and violence stemming from this ideology.
So, I'm going to persist in both my scholarship on premodern India and my accurate, timely criticisms of Hindutva. Just, increasingly, not in India.

Most recently, not even virtually: thewire.in/education/univ…

End of #THREAD

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Audrey Truschke

Dr. Audrey Truschke Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AudreyTruschke

6 Dec 20
28 years since a mob destroyed the #babrimasjid, a rare Babur-period mosque. How much do you know about this event and its repercussions?
On some of the lead-up to this terrible event:
Basic timeline of key events (note that 300+ year gap between events 1 and 2... the #babrimasjid dispute has always been a modern issue, not a premodern one): bbc.com/news/world-sou…
Read 7 tweets
20 Oct 20
Folks, I'm on a real bender of reading up on colonial-era India (don't judge; this is just how historians are). My recent and current reading lists include:
Durba Mitra's Indian Sex Life: Sexuality and the Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought amazon.com/Indian-Sex-Lif…
Debjani Bhattacharyya's Empire and Ecology in the Bengal Delta: The Making of Calcutta amazon.com/Empire-Ecology…
Read 6 tweets
4 Sep 20
To suspend this professor is a horrifying example of Western hegemony, cultural ignorance, and anti-Chinese bias.

@USC -- There are words in lots of languages that sound off to English speakers. Learning and overcoming one's own biases are part of learning a foreign language.
A few examples -- Lahore.

I once had an English-only American tell me that Pakistan should change the name of Lahore, to avoid confusion in English. No joke. I responded: "Maybe you should learn Urdu."
Sikh. As in, imagine in an intro to South Asia course, "The person you see on this slide is Sikh."

Note that there is a clear difference between the Indian term (in many languages) "Sikh" and English "sick", but English-only speakers usually cannot hear the difference.
Read 7 tweets
21 Aug 20
For those not up-to-date on Indian politics, a rough Western equivalent is this:

Nazis commit a pogrom against Jews, then blame the Jews for it, and an international publishing house platforms and profits from this anti-Semitism

@BloomsburyIndia: Do you really want to do this?
A few follow-ups, largely for the benefit of @BloomsburyIndia. They should see what they are doing with an unvarnished gaze.

Many observers and scholars consider the Delhi riots a pogrom, i.e., an organized massacre of an ethnic or religious group. In this case, Muslims.
During the 2020 Delhi riots / pogrom, Hindu right-wingers targeted Muslims with violence.

This wasn't a debate; it wasn't a clash about which reasonable people can disagree. One group tried to massacre members of another, and succeeded in taking dozens of lives.
Read 5 tweets
3 Aug 20
Thanks to US Muslim Coalition Efforts ‘Branded Cities’ Refuses to Run Adverts for Hindutva Groups at Times Square.

"Branded Cities and Nasdaq oppose the demolition of Babari masjid and will never allow any supremacist groups to run their advertisements."

clarionindia.net/thanks-to-us-m…
A few points of clarification, especially for those not super familiar with US law and culture—

In the US, you have freedom of speech, but no right to a platform. Supremacist groups are free to articulate offensive views, but no company must give them advertising space.
Most Americans still know nothing about Hindutva. But one way of thinking about this issue in the US is as follows:

Would you platform white supremacists?

If yes, then give Hindutva ideologues airtime. But if not, then steer clear of hateful Hindutva.
Read 4 tweets
23 Jul 20
Some folks have asked for basic information about the #BabriMasjid, so here goes.

Warning: Only read if you’re interested in history, not communal politics.

#THREAD
The Babri Masjid was probably built in 1528 by a general of Babur. At the time, it likely wasn’t a big deal. Babur doesn’t even mention it in his memoirs.
Babri Masjid may have been built over temple ruins, but, owing to bad and politicised archaeology, we aren’t sure.

If it was built on temple ruins, they could be Jain, Hindu, or Buddhist in origin. They also could’ve been ruins for hundreds of years by the 1520s (or not).
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!