A short 🧵 about Ursula von der Leyen - not least in response to critique of me labelling her a "second rate" politician earlier
"Second rate" is not quite right. Perhaps "politician with an unusual combination of strengths and weaknesses" is better.
1/10
The central issue is where and when vdL is a classic insider, and where she is an outsider
vdL is daughter of Ernst Albrecht, previously CDU Ministerpräsident in Lower Saxony - so in and of the party en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_Alb…
2/10
Yet other aspects set her apart. She is a women in a male dominated party (Merkel of course being the other major exception), and a protestant in a party dominated by catholics. And she's a medical doctor in a political system dominated by lawyers.
3/10
It's also her way of working that sets her apart. She's known to be a determined and hard worker, calling meetings with officials at especially early hours.
She had a flat built in the Berlaymont and lives there, and goes back to Hannover at weekends.
4/10
That means that she somehow has never been part of the fray. Never part of the rough and tumble of politics. Never really *rooted* in the political culture of the place - be that Berlin or the Brussels bubble.
There is the lingering question: is she really a team player?
5/10
There have always also been instances where she has not wanted to work with the traditional administrative machine - from reliance on consultants when Minister of Defence, to bringing in Brussels outsider Björn Seibert as Head of Cabinet
6/10
As a result there has always been a sense that she does not have the best political instincts - she makes errors because she does not read all the parts of the game, does not work with the machinery - be that of the administration or the party
7/10
That of course *sometimes* works well - it is not always good to go with the flow, to work with the machine, to do what is politically opportune
But a genuinely top class politician knows when to push and when to back off. Has an instinct for danger or making errors
8/10
The same combination of skills that made vdL a good person to front the final stages of Brexit vis à vis Boris Johnson are the same combination that meant she made a mis-step on the communication with AZ and Article 16. That is how she is I think
9/10
vdL is not universally good or universally bad as a politician. She is unusual. That can work well sometimes, and dreadfully badly sometimes too
Keep that in mind when assessing her future behaviour
10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've been pointed towards this by @hanskundnani by @MaryFitzger - entitled "What does it mean to be “pro-European” today?" While there is something to it, I think it mixes up different terms, and hence it's not quite right... This 🧵 will explain
I am also of course aware the title might not be Hans's choice...
The first issue is a basic one: to be a European, or to be a pro-European, are not - in my view - the same things
2/13
I will happily call myself a European, but not a pro-European (although plenty would describe *me* as the latter), because pro-European leads us to looking at the European Union in terms of more or less of it, rather than the individual policy outcomes it can produce
🇪🇺 sees the reality of how checks are going to have to work - for both sides - and sees any slippage of timetables as a problem. If 🇬🇧 cannot meet the 1 July deadline - just like any Brexit deadline - the question is *WHEN* it can, not *IF* it can or will
2/10
🇬🇧 sees it differently. Complying is costly and onerous, requires IT systems, sites for checks, and training of staff - so it pays lip service to complying, but keeps it vague as to how and when it will comply - the Government does not actually *DO* the necessary
Note: Gove (and the UK Government) can only get away with this because it is only about Northern Ireland, and v few Tory backbenchers really care about NI.
The EU response should be seen in this context - Gove is losing *no* political capital by announcing this.
Note: this is no comment on what *should* happen, but a comment on the politics of this, UK side.
This also should not be seen as a template for any sort of grace periods for the rest of the UK - because for that to happen Tory backbenchers *will* scream.
This is of course a rather inevitable development - the UK was *not* ready for the implications of Brexit on Northern Ireland, as pretty much every expert pointed out. And it is better to acknowledge this than be in a state of permanent denial.
58 locations of really nerdy EU stuff - places were Treaties were signed, places where EU institutions and agencies are located
And these are not *just* EU institution buildings in Brussels. That'd be too boring...
If any of these locations are wrong, or there are places you think I should add (I have only 3 that relate to historical people in the EU - if you know where someone was born or buried that would be excellent)
The European Commission has messed up its approach and comms on AstraZeneca. It could (should?) have done better.
But - I’m sorry - this is what you get with von der Leyen. She looks like she wants to take action, and goes ahead without fully considering the consequences.
This is what you get in any politics: there are good politicians, bad ones, ones with skills for some situations that then don’t work in other situations.
vdL’s approach worked better for Brexit than it did for AstraZeneca.
We should not assume the behaviour of European Commissioners is any different to that of national politicians. Politics is not a meritocracy.