I've been pointed towards this by @hanskundnani by @MaryFitzger - entitled "What does it mean to be “pro-European” today?" While there is something to it, I think it mixes up different terms, and hence it's not quite right... This 🧵 will explain
I am also of course aware the title might not be Hans's choice...
The first issue is a basic one: to be a European, or to be a pro-European, are not - in my view - the same things
2/13
I will happily call myself a European, but not a pro-European (although plenty would describe *me* as the latter), because pro-European leads us to looking at the European Union in terms of more or less of it, rather than the individual policy outcomes it can produce
3/13
It's from 2013, but I have written why it's pointless to describe oneself as pro-European here: jonworth.eu/why-its-pointl…
It's pretty obvious: there are some things the EU does that are good, some that are bad, "pro-European" implies you support the lot
4/13
Or put it another way, I am not "pro-Bundesrepublik" or "pro-Westminster" or such
And once we have free ourselves from that way of thinking we can look at the EU afresh. It exists. It is a political reality. And we can argue for different politics within it as a result
5/13
Which then brings me to the gist of Hans's piece where he does have a point - because it is based upon how the European Union is perceived within itself, as opposed to outside of it
6/13
It strikes me that the European Union can simultaneously be a cosmopolitan project *internally*, but as a bloc projecting its power outwards it can behave as a problematic actor in the way Hans describes
7/13
Of course the internal/external thing cannot be completely separated out, and that's when we end up with contortions like a Commissioner for "Promoting our European Way of Life" which... well, I questioned at the time...
All of this touches upon the sorts of questions that rankle so much for me with regard to integration, belonging - I am a proud republican in the UK, but the UK citizenship test obliges those newly becoming Brits to swear an allegiance to the queen - that I would never do
9/13
Does it make me less British that I dislike the royal family? Can I compensate that I like cricket?
Or in the European equivalent - while a Commissioner for a European way of life worries me, I guess I live a more cross-border European life than most
10/13
So - to conclude - Hans's key assertion that "whiteness may become even more central to European identity" (or, in other words, some traditional christian view of what Europe is) is indeed a danger
11/13
But each of us can counter that - by arguing that the European Union exists, will continue to exist, but that it is a contested political space - it's normal for it to produce the wrong outcomes, without us having to attack its existence
12/13
So I am a European. I am a Green European. I am a socially liberal European. I am a republican European. But I am not a pro-European.
A short 🧵 about Ursula von der Leyen - not least in response to critique of me labelling her a "second rate" politician earlier
"Second rate" is not quite right. Perhaps "politician with an unusual combination of strengths and weaknesses" is better.
1/10
The central issue is where and when vdL is a classic insider, and where she is an outsider
vdL is daughter of Ernst Albrecht, previously CDU Ministerpräsident in Lower Saxony - so in and of the party en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_Alb…
2/10
Yet other aspects set her apart. She is a women in a male dominated party (Merkel of course being the other major exception), and a protestant in a party dominated by catholics. And she's a medical doctor in a political system dominated by lawyers.
🇪🇺 sees the reality of how checks are going to have to work - for both sides - and sees any slippage of timetables as a problem. If 🇬🇧 cannot meet the 1 July deadline - just like any Brexit deadline - the question is *WHEN* it can, not *IF* it can or will
2/10
🇬🇧 sees it differently. Complying is costly and onerous, requires IT systems, sites for checks, and training of staff - so it pays lip service to complying, but keeps it vague as to how and when it will comply - the Government does not actually *DO* the necessary
Note: Gove (and the UK Government) can only get away with this because it is only about Northern Ireland, and v few Tory backbenchers really care about NI.
The EU response should be seen in this context - Gove is losing *no* political capital by announcing this.
Note: this is no comment on what *should* happen, but a comment on the politics of this, UK side.
This also should not be seen as a template for any sort of grace periods for the rest of the UK - because for that to happen Tory backbenchers *will* scream.
This is of course a rather inevitable development - the UK was *not* ready for the implications of Brexit on Northern Ireland, as pretty much every expert pointed out. And it is better to acknowledge this than be in a state of permanent denial.
58 locations of really nerdy EU stuff - places were Treaties were signed, places where EU institutions and agencies are located
And these are not *just* EU institution buildings in Brussels. That'd be too boring...
If any of these locations are wrong, or there are places you think I should add (I have only 3 that relate to historical people in the EU - if you know where someone was born or buried that would be excellent)
The European Commission has messed up its approach and comms on AstraZeneca. It could (should?) have done better.
But - I’m sorry - this is what you get with von der Leyen. She looks like she wants to take action, and goes ahead without fully considering the consequences.
This is what you get in any politics: there are good politicians, bad ones, ones with skills for some situations that then don’t work in other situations.
vdL’s approach worked better for Brexit than it did for AstraZeneca.
We should not assume the behaviour of European Commissioners is any different to that of national politicians. Politics is not a meritocracy.