1. The B.1.1.7 variant could prove to be our last major obstacle to achieving containment of the virus in the US. But it isn't getting enough respect. Many states are eliminating their effective mitigation measures such as mask mandates and on gatherings.
2. This variant increases 70-100% every week to crowd out other lineages and become dominant. In Germany, it is presently 5.8% (like San Diego) and here is their projection (via @kakape).
We are in the lull zone.
3. @CarolineYLChen talked with 10 experts
propublica.org/article/why-op…
@svscarpino @alliblk @datcummings @cmyeaton @Dr_KFO @PhilFebboMD_CMO @mtosterholm @larrybrilliant @llborio
TLDR "It’s really hard to thread this needle without sounding like a prophet of doom" —@angie_rasmussen
4. Is B.1.1.7 a variant or a strain?
latimes.com/science/story/…
It's behavior is markedly different from D614G. It clearly qualifies as a strain. While we're at it, on this #SuperBowlWeeknd, it is surely a superspreader strain since it is unequivocally more transmissible (≥50%)
5. Instead of the Sturgis rally or Rose Garden superspreader events, now the virus is driving its dissemination beyond what people do. That's a worst case scenario. We have seen the toll it has taken in the UK, Ireland, Israel, and Portugal @OurWorldInData
6. B.1.1.7 is here, in every state by now, and it is destined to do the same, in a patchwork pattern. We can't/ haven't vaccinated fast enough to put it into check. Relaxing mitigation now is the wrong strategy. It's denialism (like a year ago), the opposite of what we need to do
7. A bit more on B.1.1.7.
Its immune escape appears to be much less than B.1.351 or P.1; the vaccines are working, but:
Now 2 vaccine trials have shown a drop-off in efficacy compared with the ancestral strain
Novavax 96->86%; Astra Zeneca 84->75%
8. Updated tabular summary of the 3 major variants
9. Preprint today on B.1.1.7 shows current US spread and forecasting of how the patchwork will play out, calls for immediate and decisive action
medrxiv.org/content/10.110… @K_G_Andersen @my_helix @illumina
and by @JoelAchenbach @PostHealthSci
washingtonpost.com/health/ukvaria…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eric Topol

Eric Topol Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EricTopol

2 Feb
Pretty striking now with 6 Phase 3 vaccine trials, adding Sputnik today:
Not a single death or hospitalization in the vaccine arms due to covid-19 in over 75,000 participants
Updating my table
For Sputnik, "moderate to severe" endpoints were 20 in the placebo group, 0 in the vaccine arm (100% reduction); not broken down by severe only
More on this w/ @AstraZeneca new data from today, preprint, and @FT coverage via @jburnmurdoch
Read 4 tweets
2 Feb
From serology studies it is estimated that 80 to 100 million Americans have had covid-19 infections. New data from @florian_krammer and colleagues suggests that, with + antibody testing, 1 dose of vaccine may be a viable strategy to achieve protection medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Which is why many people getting their 1st dose of the mRNA vaccines have the expected side-effect profile of the 2nd dose. In the mRNA vaccine trials, only 2-3% of the participants were determined to be seropositive after enrollment.
I've been advocating the use of rapid, quantitative antibody testing to promote the optimal use of our vaccine supply, limited in the short term, while assuring maximal protection:
Read 4 tweets
31 Jan
For evaluating the vaccine trials (and any trials), it's important to look at the number of endpoints and their severity.
The J&J trial has the same number of endpoints as @Pfizer/ @BioNTech_Group, @moderna_tx and @Novavax (1st interim) combined /1
The total number of participants was nearly the same for J&J and Pfizer trials, but the number of events was 2.75X higher for the former. While the J&J trial had 25% of participants in South Africa (w/ 95% B.1.351 variant) that doesn't account for this difference /2
The vaccine elimination of deaths and hospitalizations in the J&J trial (including South Africa) is noteworthy since there were so few of these events in the other 3 trials. Most (~90%) of the events in all the trials are mild to moderate infections /3
Read 5 tweets
30 Jan
Back in September, we wrote a @nytopinion on the need to focus on severe infection events prevented by Covid-19 vaccines
nytimes.com/2020/09/22/opi…
Yesterday JNJ presented their Phase 3 data stressing that benefit. I spoke w/ them today & have much more confidence that it's real /1
My first question is why didn't they give actual data points and confidence intervals?
Answer: The FDA guided them not to do that. Interesting that the other companies (@Pfizer, @moderna_tx, @Novavax) did provide their data with their press releases /2
Then we reviewed the outstanding finding in their data set.
There were approximately 40-60 hospitalizations and deaths in the whole trial. All in the placebo group. Period. Even those occurring in South Africa. That is *great news* /3
Read 5 tweets
29 Jan
Big news: The JNJ vaccine results of 44,000 Phase 3 trial, a single dose. Overall 66% efficacy, with the contrast of 72% in US but 57% in South Africa, confirming immune escape/resistance of B.1.351 variant seen by Novavax
This news is certainly welcome, clearly fulfills FDA threshold and adds to the vaccine tool chest. It is a clear drop down from the 2-dose mRNA efficacy
statnews.com/2021/01/29/jj-… @matthewherper @statnews
I have to revise the #SARSCoV2 Variant table with latest information from past 12 hours
Read 6 tweets
28 Jan
First evidence in man that there is #SARSCoV2 vaccine resistance to B.1.351 ("South African") variant
nytimes.com/2021/01/28/hea… Not good to see
@Novavax by @katie_thomas @carlzimmer @SharonLNYT
South African trial of >4,000 participants
49.4% efficacy
Of 44 participants with infection events, sequencing of their virus showed B.1.351 in 25 samples
@novavax slide via @kakape shows differences in participants with or without HIV and different denominator for sequencing than above.
--25/27 infection events were B.1.351
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!