What were witnessing is not a trial in any form of the word. 1. We're watching a political proceeding. We're watching an "impeachment confirmation hearing." Josh Hawley had his feet up on his desk while the prosecution displayed very damming proof of guilt. He was reading a paper
2. After the prosecution's we'll prepared opener, out waltzed the bottom of the barrel of lazy, haphazard "lawyers" who's opening statement was saying that they had to rethink their strategy because of the powerful arguments presented by the prosecution. Really?
3. This bozo actually proclaimed that they'd been outclassed. No wonder at all, since this kangaroo court is moot. They've got the votes. They've allowed their cowardice and weakness to resonate through the halls of the Senate. These buffoons represent the worst in us
4. No, we are not watching a trial. Raskin and his team are conducting their evidence to deaf ears and blinded eyes. There's IS no caveat to the language of the Constitution that says: "The Senate shall have the sole power to try ALL impeachments." #Trunt wins this one.
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
