X : Could covid be like the flu, a re-occuring disease that we just get used to?
Me : What? Like smallpox? Hmmm, that's probably one of the daftest statements I've seen in a long time. No, do not think like flu. Think eradication.
X : Views on anti-vaxxers?
Me : Nothing positive. Second most dangerous group that I'm aware of in this pandemic.
X : The first?
Me : The badly named "Covid Recovery Group" or CRG who seem hell bent on keeping us in a state of constant waves of infection by opening up too early.
X : What's wrong with them?
Me : They keep arguing that the Gov is changing the rules by adding science like "Rate of Infection" -
... doh. It's that sort of mentality, refusal to look at the science which does not bode well for climate change.
X : What has climate change got to do with COVID?
Me : Everything. It's another shock, another forcing function heading our way where the balance of "We" vs "Me" will determine our success or failure in mitigating its impact.
X : Don't you mean stopping?
Me : That's long passed.
X : How is the vaccine roll-out going?
Me : From all accounts, very well. It's testimony to the benefits of a national health service and the volunteers who have helped.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
X : Is map camp happening?
Me : Yep. Plan is for Wed, Oct 13th. Three tracks using the same triad format as last year.
X : Three tracks?
Me : Yep. Three themes - sustainability, diversity and good.
X : Good?
Me : Yep. Do good. Maps for good. It's not enough to do no evil.
There has always been a strong positive approach in the mapping community. Yes, maps can be used for profit, to outwit competitors etc ... but there's more to mapping than that. There's more to society than just the economy. We need to up the tempo a bit.
X : Don't you have to define what good is?
Me : The ethics of care versus the ethics of choice, the balance between me versus we ... this is the debate we (as a collective) need to have.
X : Thoughts on digital sovereignty?
Me : Blah, blah, blah.
X : Eh?
Me : Most people talk a lot of nonsense when it comes to digital sovereignty. One of my least favourite topics filled with hand waving political consultants pretending to be generals - swardley.medium.com/digital-sovere…
... it's up there with the old "let's create an industrial policy without any understanding of the landscape" wheeze ... endless hand waving and posturing by people who haven't got a clue and shouldn't be allowed to run a booze up in a brewery (see Vince Cable).
X : You don't like Vince Cable?
Me : I struggle to think of a minister who was more useless. In an era of titans like Francis Maude then Cable was out of his depth and it showed.
X : Thoughts on digital transformation?
Me : I prefer half hearted digital catch-up.
X : Why?
Me : Be honest. It's a bunch of laggards discovering the internet and spending vast sums removing custom built stuff that was industrialised long ago in order to be more 2010.
X : That's a bit hard.
Me : Not really. You need to be honest otherwise you'll think you're doing something innovate or leading the field or ... you're playing catch up from a long long way behind, the goal is not to lead but at least to keep the front pack in sight.
Think of it more like, you're in a formula one race and your digital transformation is more replacing the horse and cart with a car. It's not a very good car, you're not going to be competing but at least it's a little bit less embarassing.
X : Have you played Outerworlds?
Me : No. I'm not much of a gamer but I have some rules.
X : Such as?
Me : I normally wait a couple of years after it's released and look at the modding community. If there is a vibrant and active community then I'll buy it, mod it and play.
... that's assuming it's an immersive (i.e. first person) environment. I don't play 3rd person games, I find them dull i.e. the whole Witcher series. Bored after 30 minutes. Best of the bunch are Fallout 4 and Skyrim SE with Skyrim SE ruling.
X : Cyberpunk?
Me : 2077? Too new which means too buggy, I'll wait for 18 months and see what the state is, how vibrant the modding community is and whether decent modding tools have been provided.
X : Is the modding community really that important?
Me : For me? Yes.
X : What are the most profound technologies that are appearing today?
Me : Hmmm. The most profound technologies in terms of impact today are not appearing today, they appeared quite some time ago. What's happening is they are industrialising today.
X : Can you unpack that?
Me : Ok. Let us take machine learning, open access (to data, to code), collaboration tools (from reddit to twitter), virtual interfaction (from video conferencing to virtual worlds) then none of this stuff is "new" but ...
... all of this stuff is industrialising, becoming common services and part of our core infrastructure with this process accelerated by the isolation economy caused by covid ...
X : In 2007, you said that cloud was the future ...
Me : I think you'll find I said utility computing was the future, circa 2005, before EC2 even launched. Was there a point?
X : Yes, you said it would take 10-15 years.
Me : Correct. 10-15 years to become accepted as the new norm once the transition started. Given it started 2006, that's now. I think we can say that cloud is the new norm.
X : But what about enterprises that haven't adopted?
Me : I did say that even when it had become the new norm then it would take a further 20-25 years for the laggards to adopt. Are we talking hybrid?