The point of the witnesses was not to change Republican minds. Christ. The point of impeachment was not to change Republican minds. REPUBLICAN MINDS CANNOT BE CHANGED.
The point of witnesses was to make it as UGLY AS POSSIBLE for Republicans to vote to acquit, which we all knew they were going to do anyway.

Impeachment itself was a waste of time, if you thought the point was to convince REPUBLICANS.
The impeachment managers are saying "we proved our case."

THAT WAS NEVER IN DOUBT. The case was "proven" on Jan 6.
Why even have the vote for witnesses, WIN THAT VOTE, and not call them?? That's the question I want these reporters to ask.
House managers saying "We proved our case" reminds me of myself in middle school. Screaming "This is ILLEGAL, Lewis" hoping somebody will hear me from inside the locker Lewis stuffed me into.
Of course, @JoyAnnReid asked the question *exactly* right. WHY have the vote for witnesses and not call them.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Elie Mystal

Elie Mystal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ElieNYC

14 Feb
This is the most "Indiana" story I've read since the one about the Vice President from Indiana who couldn't say a mean word about the boss who tried to have him murdered.

nytimes.com/2021/02/13/art…
“I can certainly say that if we were writing this again, with all the feedback we’ve gotten, we wouldn’t write it that way.”
-- like, notice the non-apology there? Oh, they're DEFINITELY still committed to "white art" (whatever in the FUCK that means), but won't say so again.
Their fix changes "white art" to "core art." Which, now that they've already expounded on what they think their "core" is, makes it literally no better.
Read 6 tweets
14 Feb
Question for the hive mind.

You're almost done with your cup of coffee, but what's left is cold. There's hot coffee in the pot, and you're definitely going to have another cup. Do you:

A: Finish your cup of now cold coffee and then refill?
B: Top up your cup immediately?
You people arguing "C: dup the cup and refill with a fresh one" are some profligate motherfuckers. :)
You people suggesting a desk side mug warmer, which is an invention I did not know existed, have essentially:
A: Affirmed the entire point of this stupid app that has the side effect of ruining democracy.
B: Reminded me, once again, that money solves most problems.
Read 4 tweets
12 Feb
This should be interesting: Collins and Murkowski ask when Trump learned of the riot and what actions Trump took to stop the riot.
And Trump's lawyers just straight up don't know. And they're blaming a lack of an "investigation" for why they don't know.
That was, without a doubt, the weakest shit from Trump's people this entire week.

Think about a murder case:

Collins: When did you client know that the victim wounded, and what actions did you client take to save him.
Lawyers: Who can know? And THAT is the problem.
Jury: wut?
Read 6 tweets
9 Feb
I really hate this game of "let's cite a @FedSoc guy for authority because he's not being a complete intellectually dishonest dick this time."

I get why they're doing it. But, like, I don't cite Satan when making my argument that sex is good and fun. There are other sources.
And now we're elevating Turley. This is annoying.
This argument also proceeds from a false pretense: that Republicans are reasonable and can be convinced through logic or shamed by their own hypocrisy.

None of that is true. Republicans will say one thing today and another thing tomorrow. It's their way.
Read 4 tweets
8 Feb
I wouldn't *completely* dunk on a lawsuit against GorillaGlue. Label says "skin" not "hair" which is different. And there are things such as hair glue.
It's not the easiest case to make, but it's not as dumb as, like, 90% of the Trump election lawsuits the media took seriously.
And, that's absolutely a point worth making. People feel chesty to dunk on a Black woman who admittedly did something stupid.
But the actual POTUS and the @GOP made far more legally dubious arguments for 77 days and mainstream press treated them like they had a shot.
So, I dunno, maybe think about who you're dragging and why. Is it that you've really thought through personal injury law? At the very least, consider if you've brought the same energy for this person as you've brought to Rand Paul, who is actually dumber.
Read 6 tweets
3 Feb
I usually share *positive* stories about my kids and my relations to them. But, you know, those are the best bits. Overall, the struggle is real. Here's half an hour from my life today:
The 5yo was supposed to draw a picture of winter stuff yesterday, which of course he didn't do, even though I specifically told him to do it, yesterday, I didn't check that it was done.
So, today, right before his lunch break, the teacher says he needs to bring the picture with him for his class in half an hour. I run around finding him paper and say "DRAW A SNOWMAN" then go to make his lunch.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!