@JoeBiden could not be more WRONG about student debt. It's not Harvard grads that graduate with the most student debt in this country, as Harvard has GENEROUS GRANT MONEY to offer

Check your BU grads, your BC grads, and your completely out of touch understanding of the problem.
Moreover, to the extent that graduates of elite and expensive schools have more debt, that debt is DISPROPOTIONIATELY borne by students of color, who are least likely to have family financial help them through the ivory education they've earned but can't afford.
And, don't even get me started on the fact that hampering students, ANY students, with a lot of debt, makes it MORE LIKELY those kids will take the highest paying/most soul destroying job they can find, as opposed to taking less money to contribute to the greater good.
Making a state school/Ivy school distinction here is a GREAT way to turn more Ivy grads into McKinsey consultants.
Biden comes from an era where going to college was a little bit like buying a car. You could buy a decent one if you saved up your summer job money.

NOW, it's like buying a house. Even a modest one can ruin you financially if you take on more debt than you can afford.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Elie Mystal

Elie Mystal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ElieNYC

17 Feb
On the courts, Democrats are the kids who give the bully their lunch money without conflict to avoid the unpleasantness of being stuffed in a locker.
For those who don't know: blue slips allow Republicans to block district court appointments, if one Republican Senator from that district objects.

It's how, say, Texas courts end up being full of trash Republican judges, even when Dems are in control of the WH and Senate.
Republicans all but ignored blue slips while they were in power. So Dems holding to them for District Court is, you know, the classic Democrat thing of hugging the distinguished gentlemen from across the aisle who just wants to humiliate trans kids... because COMITY
Read 7 tweets
14 Feb
This is the most "Indiana" story I've read since the one about the Vice President from Indiana who couldn't say a mean word about the boss who tried to have him murdered.

nytimes.com/2021/02/13/art…
“I can certainly say that if we were writing this again, with all the feedback we’ve gotten, we wouldn’t write it that way.”
-- like, notice the non-apology there? Oh, they're DEFINITELY still committed to "white art" (whatever in the FUCK that means), but won't say so again.
Their fix changes "white art" to "core art." Which, now that they've already expounded on what they think their "core" is, makes it literally no better.
Read 6 tweets
14 Feb
Question for the hive mind.

You're almost done with your cup of coffee, but what's left is cold. There's hot coffee in the pot, and you're definitely going to have another cup. Do you:

A: Finish your cup of now cold coffee and then refill?
B: Top up your cup immediately?
You people arguing "C: dup the cup and refill with a fresh one" are some profligate motherfuckers. :)
You people suggesting a desk side mug warmer, which is an invention I did not know existed, have essentially:
A: Affirmed the entire point of this stupid app that has the side effect of ruining democracy.
B: Reminded me, once again, that money solves most problems.
Read 4 tweets
13 Feb
The point of the witnesses was not to change Republican minds. Christ. The point of impeachment was not to change Republican minds. REPUBLICAN MINDS CANNOT BE CHANGED.
The point of witnesses was to make it as UGLY AS POSSIBLE for Republicans to vote to acquit, which we all knew they were going to do anyway.

Impeachment itself was a waste of time, if you thought the point was to convince REPUBLICANS.
The impeachment managers are saying "we proved our case."

THAT WAS NEVER IN DOUBT. The case was "proven" on Jan 6.
Read 6 tweets
12 Feb
This should be interesting: Collins and Murkowski ask when Trump learned of the riot and what actions Trump took to stop the riot.
And Trump's lawyers just straight up don't know. And they're blaming a lack of an "investigation" for why they don't know.
That was, without a doubt, the weakest shit from Trump's people this entire week.

Think about a murder case:

Collins: When did you client know that the victim wounded, and what actions did you client take to save him.
Lawyers: Who can know? And THAT is the problem.
Jury: wut?
Read 6 tweets
9 Feb
I really hate this game of "let's cite a @FedSoc guy for authority because he's not being a complete intellectually dishonest dick this time."

I get why they're doing it. But, like, I don't cite Satan when making my argument that sex is good and fun. There are other sources.
And now we're elevating Turley. This is annoying.
This argument also proceeds from a false pretense: that Republicans are reasonable and can be convinced through logic or shamed by their own hypocrisy.

None of that is true. Republicans will say one thing today and another thing tomorrow. It's their way.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!