In the "Buddhist" temples in Thailand, you can find Ganesha. Even Shiva-Parvati.
This has been part of a continuum of Hindu culture before the construction of "Buddhism" as a "revolt" against "Hinduism" by colonial scholarship. (and their academic progeny in India).
The Buddha reaffirmed varna. Most of Buddhas followers were Brahmins and Kshatriyas. He himself was proud of his Kshatriya heritage, never disavowed it.
Neo-Buddhists have created an imaginary Buddha and Buddhism.
Hindu traditions are about “how to experience Ananda” or how to be happy. There are different paths/panths to happiness. Different paths debate on the nature of reality, of practice, of effective methods.
That “Buddhism” “Sikhism” etc are “revolt against caste” is nonsense.
Yes colonial education and Indian academia creates hate based on falsehoods coming from the colonial gaze.
The lived experience of people and the traditions is entirely different.
To fight colonial consciousness we have to build on our experience.
Christians and the West should take a thousand year moratorium on “saving” anyone. Whether via “Jesus” or “human rights.” Both are forms of imperialism.
Taimur is an Islamic tyrant you made a mountain of Hindu skulls—common people, not warriors. His name still evokes terror in collective memory as Taimurlang. Saif is a "history buff" who specifically chose the name for the historical Taimur, per Kareena.
Saif's act reflects Islamic triumphalism, much like ISIS converted young Yezidi boys and used them to attack their own community. This fanaticism births Taimur from Saif's "conquest" of the native.
Brahmanvaad is a made-up term. It is a product of colonialism. No one used it before that. For missionaries Brahmins were rivals and thus targets of hate. That is its origin.