Dem Manhattan DA went after a GOP POTUS for a rarely prosecuted, immaterial, misdemeanor of business records (how Trump Org listed the money they gave to two blackmailers). Then the DA admitted to rely on “published reports” that Trump is corrupt as reason to get 8 years taxes.
https://twitter.com/joshgerstein/status/1363859691613392898
The above 1 tweet summarizes the full pic of the politically corrupt, banana republic-like abusive case against Trump.
If you cheer it on don’t whine to me about Putin.
Not one Trump Attorney/PR hand summarized all the abuses in one tweet the way I did because he hires clowns.
If you cheer it on don’t whine to me about Putin.
Not one Trump Attorney/PR hand summarized all the abuses in one tweet the way I did because he hires clowns.
Basically, there is no judicial recourse for when a prosector abuses power. He gets a pass on doing so.
In this case, an abusively corrupt Dem Manhattan DA has the power to see 8 years of Trump tax to find illegalities with a given reason that “published reports” said Trump Bad.
In this case, an abusively corrupt Dem Manhattan DA has the power to see 8 years of Trump tax to find illegalities with a given reason that “published reports” said Trump Bad.
Again:
Media reported repeatedly that Orange Man Bad.
Dem Manhattan DA cites those “published reports” with no other proof of fraud as reason to get 8 years of tax records from Trump and his businesses.
“6-3 Small-Gov Conservative” SCOTUS says sure go right ahead.
But Putin.
Media reported repeatedly that Orange Man Bad.
Dem Manhattan DA cites those “published reports” with no other proof of fraud as reason to get 8 years of tax records from Trump and his businesses.
“6-3 Small-Gov Conservative” SCOTUS says sure go right ahead.
But Putin.
The key diff between the US Justice System and the Russia one is the amount of paperwork.
A Dem prosecutor decided to go after a Republican based on “published reports.” Instead of being able to do so outright, he needed to file papers with courts who rubber stamp his abuse.
A Dem prosecutor decided to go after a Republican based on “published reports.” Instead of being able to do so outright, he needed to file papers with courts who rubber stamp his abuse.
The Dem Manhattan DA case against Republican POTUS Trump started on whether the Trump Org correctly filed in its books the money given to Cohen to pay off blackmailers.
That’s right: Instead of arresting SD for blackmailing Trump into a $100K+ ransom, the DA went after Trump!
That’s right: Instead of arresting SD for blackmailing Trump into a $100K+ ransom, the DA went after Trump!
Basically, according to NY law a company must keep accurate business records. For example, if a company files that something was a legal fee and not marketing (such as the reimbursements to Michael Cohen), it’s a misdemeanor even if this did not change the company’s tax bill.
Those things rarely if ever get prosecuted because it’s immaterial as it does not change the company’s tax liability. Besides, who says reimbursing Cohen for paying ransom to blackmailers is marketing? Maybe it’s legal? It’s a clown law abused by the DA against Trump.
Even IF the abusively corrupt Dem DA had reason to investigate this, he should have requested only the few entries covering those checks. Why does he need EIGHT YEARS of Trump tax records? Trump attorneys asked this.
Answer: “Published Reports” said Trump org is corrupt.
Answer: “Published Reports” said Trump org is corrupt.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
