Haha. Just days ago, @slpng_giants argued to me here that Twitter enforced rules equally.

But Twitter is clearly not even-handed which is their right, but my point was that any Con who runs an op like Sleeping Giants would be banned for “targeted harassment.”
On the day that @TwitterComms gave a pass for @ProjectLincoln’s posting illegally private DMs (one Twitter offense) to intimidate a journalist (another offense), Project Veritas’ account is reportedly suspended permanently for posting “private info” (i.e doing journalism).
The “private info” posted by Project Veritas is legal-recordings of the subject of their investigative journalism!

I have no idea why @TwitterComms even bothers to cite a rule when they block non-Libs. Why not say “we suspended the account just because we can. Pound sand!”
The frustrating part with how Twitter suspense account is that there’s no way for you to behave according to rules to avoid suspension. If you tweet all week, Twitter can cite rules that you violated.

Suspensions are political; ZERO with how accounts behave.

@leslieberland
If I were to continue mentioning in this thread the handles of a few senior people at Twitter, they can suspend me for “inciting harassment” and/or for “spreading disinfo” because they disagree with how I present the FACTS.

Carpe Donktum was removed for “copyright violations.”
Anyone who posts here still memes, photo or video that someone else took, is essentially in copyright violation. Lib meme makers do it all the time, but Carpe Donktum was removed.

Oh it’s not a real name. He could have been banned for “fake identity” too.

cc @kayvz @bborrman

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yossi Gestetner

Yossi Gestetner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @YossiGestetner

10 Feb
This impeachment is a continuation of treating Trump as an illegitimate POTUS; as if he did not win fairly, and for what sin? For not accepting 2020.

Again: Trump is being lambasted for not accepting the 2020 results by people who treat him as if he never won 2016.
This reminds me of the Steele Dossier which was practically a product of a DNC/HRC contractor colluding with Russia to smear Trump that Trump is the colluder.

Diabolical.

A Russian collusion product was key in investigating if Trump colluded.

Same idea is happening here.
Namely, if Democrats had accepted Trump as a legitimate president they would not dare impeach him as a former president.

So... Dems are persecuting Trump for not accepting 2020 by a tool that is in use only because Dems did still not accept 2016.
Read 8 tweets
9 Feb
A reminder why it’s cool for GOP voters that @SenateGOP lost control after the GA runoffs.

No reason for weak-kneed, self-serving, attention-hungry useful idiots to be in the majority.
The fraud nature of the vote by @MittRomney @BillCassidy @BenSasse etc is evident that none of them call for the House GOP to bring up impeachment of former Dem presidents Obama/Clinton. Those 6 GOP Senators were not even on the forefront to uncover 2016 Obama DOJ abuses.
Senator Leahy is the presiding “judge” of the impeachment but he is also a vote/juror in it.

I don’t see principled @BenSasse @MittRomney raising alarms about it

How can Leahy pledge to be and be “fair to all sides” when he is a vote on one of those sides?

cc @ReaganBattalion
Read 14 tweets
9 Feb
Thank God for @NRO. Doing the work that CNN/NYT are better at.
If a Republican Congress tried pulling on a former Democrat president what the Dems did today with doctored, edited and misrepresented videos, BLM (Big Lib Media) would destroy it.

Now however many in Con Media are helping Dems.

Really odd.

@MZHemingway addressed it.
Many @HouseDemocrats openly called for and/or excused mass violence in recent years in ways that Trump never did, and those words were followed by violence not seen from Trump’s side. Instead of @AndrewCMcCarthy calling out this and the doctored nature of the Dem video, Andy
Read 4 tweets
7 Feb
Columbia estimates that 125 million people in America had Coronavirus.

With 450,000 deaths, Corona’s death rate in the US is 0.36% and that’s after the easy way with which deaths are attributed to Corona.

With this in mind, pls read my thread from last year mid-March.
In March 2020, estimates were that COVID-19 spreads VERY fast and that 1% to 3.4% infected people will die.

This would mean 1.25 mill to 4.25 mill deaths in the US at this point.

The flawed math drove lockdown policies.

My 3/15/20 thread (👆🏼) argued that the math is way off.
CDC estimates that at the end of 2020, 83 million people in the US already had Coronavirus.

At that point, there were 356,000 deaths attributed to Coronavirus in the US.

This is a 0.42% death rate.

With this in mind, pls read my Pinned Tweet thread from mid-March 2020.
Read 5 tweets
5 Feb
Feds used bank records to harass someone for the suspicion of being in DC on 1/6/21 as if merely being there is a crime. Victim cleared of wrong doing.

DC resident’s cell signal was used to track her. Feds visited. Turns out she was out on a stroll that day.

But Putin.
The blatant crushing of civil-liberties by the Wray KGB is ignored because it was a “terrorist attack” in @jaketapper’s words. It was “an attack on democracy.” It was a “coup.” It was “sedition.”

Once you apply those crazy words, media/politicos agree to gov abuses of citizens.
Cute how DC GOPs, Dems and Media condemn Putin for arresting people who pushed police officers while those same people ignore or back that the FBI is using bank/cell signal records to chase down people who did no riot or even trespass on 1/6/21.

They were merely in the DC area.
Read 5 tweets
3 Feb
1/ Selling when you are down is THE way to lose money because you have no chance to earn anything back if things rise.

When I am down steep on a stock, I buy more. This brings down my average buy price; losses start to recover sooner and it can turn profitable sooner too.
2/ @stoolpresidente It almost always worked for me.

Example:

I moved into $MJ at $30. Then at $20. Then at $10.50.

My average buy price dropped to $17.00

It crashed to under $9.

Then it rose, and rose and rose. It hit today $23.88.

Losses long recovered. Gains are here too.
3/ Newcomers’ mistakes don’t start with selling when down.

The mistake starts by chasing stocks on the upswing (I did not touch #GME), and another mistake is buying their full hand at the start. I place only 40% of my would-be hand. If it rises, great. If it crashes, I buy more.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!