To Telegram. I was under the WRONG impression that there was NO desktop app for Telegram. Not ONLY wrong, but easy as pie. Mine is now up and running. Here's the link to get started:
You just follow the easy instructions, and if you already have a phone version, head over to settings and scan the QR code in, and boom, voilla, your desktop version is up and running with all your chats.
From what I've learned so far, there are several comparisons that help open up initial comprehension. First is DMs and DM rooms here at Twitter. Telegram is all about CHATTING. And it essentially replicates those Twitter functions, but with strong security. This is good.
It appears to be somewhat like Facebook Messenger, as it is an Instant Messaging App with robust file sharing capabilities. Messenger's Groups function and Telegram's rooms appear very similar as well.
I find the desktop version far more intuitive than my iPhone version, but I remain a desktop as opposed to a smart phone man, to be sure. Still, I kind of like this interface!
What's MOST interesting to me is that I've been whining about not being able to text message from my desktop, forever. I know What's App cuts into that space, but I don't like the interface for either phone or desktop on What's App...yet. Let me explain a bit...
When I got started on What's App, I was NOT dedicated to learning it. Mostly my family forced me to use it, since they like it. I remain uncomfortable mixing family and social media. It hasn't gone well at Facebook. So, that makes me nervous.
Thing is, I have to learn security protocols in all platforms, so I might as well let go of that silliness. This week is Telegram week. Next week will be What's App. In for a pound, in for a ton, as I like to say.
Last point. Evidently Telegram provides 3 different modes of chatting. One-to-one with a Contact. One-to-many with a group. And, I have yet to discover what a Channel actually is. I think the Group is the equal of DM rooms, here.
That's all for now. I will of course keep you posted as I learn more.
Whoops, a couple of more points. First, I'm learning across all platforms, and with my phone and computer too, that I MUST become INTIMATELY familiar with the Settings options. It's just mandatory. This shot is from the Desktop version.
You definitely want to open up the Notifications and UNCHECK sounds. It shows differently on the desktop from the phone. You can see I've done so, and left the other boxes all checked.
I have a lot more to learn about the notifications. This is what my phone's look like right now. But this will change. Also, I snapped the screenshot on my phone and posted it to my own saved messages on desktop. Awesome!
This really is my last point. I just check this thread on my phone, and Twitter broke it there. I never noticed before that that is one of Twitter's suppression methods. Break the thread on your phone, even if it is unbroken on your desktop. Wow.
Now, I'll try to answer some of the posted questions. Good hunting, Patriots. We will protect our free speech yet!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's a bit of prep for tomorrow's work. Posse. In one word, it means that every citizen is responsible for catching evil doers and bringing them to justice. We all know who they are. The sheriff deputizes us. We ride. There is a hue and cry. We all ride.
Note that it is the sheriff who calls the hue and cry. It is not the police department. Why not? Police do not deputize. Sheriffs do. They talk about community policing. It's a great idea. Sheriffs, voted in by the people, have been doing just that for centuries.
Voted in by the people, the sheriff turns right back to the people and deputizes us with his hue and cry. It's on us to help him. Imagine that. Bad guys go run. They flee. We catch them. We bring them to justice. That is law and order. Without it, there is no freedom.
Imagine: An Elected Law Enforcement Officer Sworn To The Constitution
How, exactly, is law enforced? There are two basic models. A police department is empowered under its local magistrates. A sheriff’s department is empowered under the vote.
2) Be clear, the vote is a very messy thing. Elections cost money. People who give money want benefits in return. Democracies have, throughout history, failed as a result. The politician may be corrupted. The public trust may be abused.
3) How is this addressed? The traditional answer has been character, as judged by a superior. A king appoints his local officers on the basis of their character, as perceived by himself. They collect his taxes and enforce his royal mandates. He likes them.
As I've shared, my diehard, Bastiat-Class Libertarian days were short lived: 2012 - 2016. You can't be an honest Libertarian and true Trump supporter at the same time. Let's talk about that.
2) I know Libertarians who at first more than detested Trump, they either didn't vote or truly pinched nose and squinted in the voting booth, hating every second and scurrying rapidly and stealthily away in self-disgust. I exaggerate, but only a little.
3) I know other Libertarians who were - unlike me - capable not only of liking and supporting Trump IN SPITE OF their ideals who were able to see him as a step in the right as opposed to the wrong direction. Those good souls are more naturally pragmatic than I am. I am a purest.
Here’s a little success story. From Safari, I couldn’t successfully log 🪵 to my Parler account. Someone here said to try it from Google instead. Go figure, it worked!
Ha! I didn’t notice the auto emoji for log 🪵...
Was it you, @idkaskmom, who clued me in on NOT going there from Safari?
Theories often wake me up stealthily. A bottle of water is needed, I think. Water imbibed but still not somnolent, there are always books available to read. Until...
2) The attempt at reading fails. A new, potential comprehension arises, far more as a guess than any positive assertion, and boom, a baby theory pops out and must be captured before it flits away. DJT is a visionary, patient, and in complete control of...himself.
3) You hear the theories out there that he is crushed under his horrible defeat. Or, that his is in complete control of all the requisite apparatus to reemerge as Commander In Chief, having never actually surrendered. There was a lawful election, and he maintains, we're told.
Interesting. I couldn't move fast enough to snag screenshots. I just posted my first post-Purge Parley, and got a message that I had succeeded, but that only after Parler had done it's thing would my Parley be sent out into the world. Not a good sign...
Here's what my account looks like, right now. I know, I have to give them time, and I will. But wow, not looking quite up to speed yet, and screening my posts with that much scrutiny? It's not feeling quite like free speech!
Hey, it was published rapidly. They just shouldn't have given the notification of an "approval process." Now let's see if I can't figure out how to access my profile and snag my account name, long as it is...