Here's a bit of prep for tomorrow's work. Posse. In one word, it means that every citizen is responsible for catching evil doers and bringing them to justice. We all know who they are. The sheriff deputizes us. We ride. There is a hue and cry. We all ride.
Note that it is the sheriff who calls the hue and cry. It is not the police department. Why not? Police do not deputize. Sheriffs do. They talk about community policing. It's a great idea. Sheriffs, voted in by the people, have been doing just that for centuries.
Voted in by the people, the sheriff turns right back to the people and deputizes us with his hue and cry. It's on us to help him. Imagine that. Bad guys go run. They flee. We catch them. We bring them to justice. That is law and order. Without it, there is no freedom.
I say let us all dream a new dream of law and order upon our land. We'll talk about the vote. We'll talk about corrupt judges. We'll raise the hue and cry. America is a land of freedom, which means it is a land of law and order. And for that, we thank the sheriff.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One sees different numbers. The best one I’ve got is 3,083 Sheriffs in America, of whom at least 98%, or a minimum of 3,021 are elected.
2) As you dive into the history, you rapidly discover that the Office of the Sheriff (NOT the Sheriff's Department) has been pilloried over the fact of its political nature. That a Sheriff must fight to win election has been poo-pooed by the elite in our nation.
3) As a student of The Left, and of Communism and its agenda, it never crossed my mind that the Constitutional nature of the Office of the Sheriff had placed it on their hit list. That is, before this very week. I now realize the Office has been under continuous attack.
Imagine: An Elected Law Enforcement Officer Sworn To The Constitution
How, exactly, is law enforced? There are two basic models. A police department is empowered under its local magistrates. A sheriff’s department is empowered under the vote.
2) Be clear, the vote is a very messy thing. Elections cost money. People who give money want benefits in return. Democracies have, throughout history, failed as a result. The politician may be corrupted. The public trust may be abused.
3) How is this addressed? The traditional answer has been character, as judged by a superior. A king appoints his local officers on the basis of their character, as perceived by himself. They collect his taxes and enforce his royal mandates. He likes them.
To Telegram. I was under the WRONG impression that there was NO desktop app for Telegram. Not ONLY wrong, but easy as pie. Mine is now up and running. Here's the link to get started:
You just follow the easy instructions, and if you already have a phone version, head over to settings and scan the QR code in, and boom, voilla, your desktop version is up and running with all your chats.
From what I've learned so far, there are several comparisons that help open up initial comprehension. First is DMs and DM rooms here at Twitter. Telegram is all about CHATTING. And it essentially replicates those Twitter functions, but with strong security. This is good.
As I've shared, my diehard, Bastiat-Class Libertarian days were short lived: 2012 - 2016. You can't be an honest Libertarian and true Trump supporter at the same time. Let's talk about that.
2) I know Libertarians who at first more than detested Trump, they either didn't vote or truly pinched nose and squinted in the voting booth, hating every second and scurrying rapidly and stealthily away in self-disgust. I exaggerate, but only a little.
3) I know other Libertarians who were - unlike me - capable not only of liking and supporting Trump IN SPITE OF their ideals who were able to see him as a step in the right as opposed to the wrong direction. Those good souls are more naturally pragmatic than I am. I am a purest.
Here’s a little success story. From Safari, I couldn’t successfully log 🪵 to my Parler account. Someone here said to try it from Google instead. Go figure, it worked!
Ha! I didn’t notice the auto emoji for log 🪵...
Was it you, @idkaskmom, who clued me in on NOT going there from Safari?
Theories often wake me up stealthily. A bottle of water is needed, I think. Water imbibed but still not somnolent, there are always books available to read. Until...
2) The attempt at reading fails. A new, potential comprehension arises, far more as a guess than any positive assertion, and boom, a baby theory pops out and must be captured before it flits away. DJT is a visionary, patient, and in complete control of...himself.
3) You hear the theories out there that he is crushed under his horrible defeat. Or, that his is in complete control of all the requisite apparatus to reemerge as Commander In Chief, having never actually surrendered. There was a lawful election, and he maintains, we're told.