This term, with all that’s gone on, I took a bit of a risk: I let my class pick their own group and their own book, regardless of their reading ability.
It’s early days...but I think it’s really paying off. 1/7
I had selected 8 different stories (mostly Oxford reading tree, various levels) with 6 copies of each.
Before being set loose to ‘browse the bookstore’ the class created success criteria from a discussion around how you can choose a ‘good book’ for you. 2/7
Fears there might be a book that more than six pupils wanted to read did not materialise and I’ve now got 6 reading groups.
We took a quick minute to create some ‘values’ that everyone had to follow when reading in a group. 3/7
The reading operates by the whole group reading the chapter together. They then return to the start and read a paragraph one after the other, with peer support assisting with any tricky words. Then the whole group summarise the chapter to one another. 4/7
Then, we create a task as a whole class that can be applied to every book. I usually present a quick problem/example/question that is used to generate SC.
Don’t @ me, the learning intention will be ‘creating questions’ - I was clearly too involved in reading detectives! 5/7
The task is only designed to last around 15 minutes. We stop to peer asses another groups work (they don’t need to know the story, just to understand the LI and SC) and then a further 5 minutes is given to incorporate the wish/finish.
This was creating a character profile. 6/7
Early days but benefits wise:
- smiles
- excitement
- independence
- motivation
- peer support
- I can still target support to individuals
- ethos
- encouragement (many lovely things I’m overhearing “let’s all read together again because we sound good”) 7/7
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Apparently it seems to some that the first 3 people listed are more appropriate ‘names’ for primary school houses than the girl who survived a taliban gunshot and has championed education since.
1/5
When deciding on famous people to name a school house after, one must accept standards & culture were different in times gone by.
But Walter Raleigh led the massacre of and beheadings of 600 Spanish and Italian men who had surrendered.
A role model for primary kids? 2/5
Francis Drake was involved in battles in Ireland too. When the troops at Rathlin Castle surrendered, he tortured and killed all 200ish soldiers and 400 civilian men, women and children. He wasn’t taking orders, he made the call.
1/4 I’m coming across more ‘likes’ and ‘retweets’ on my feed of practitioners who advocate zero tolerance approaches to behaviour.
If there is one thing NOT to do after the summer, it’s to apply harmful, blanket behaviour policies to year groups.
Instead, try these:
2/4 Google and read around these subjects:
Trauma Informed Schools
CPAG (CPAG in Scotland too)
1 in 4
Restorative Practice
Social Justice in Schools
EEF Behaviour
Teacher Bias/Implicit Bias
Pivotal Education
ACEs (though, read critically, there’s some misinformation out there)
I ran a poll about Stormzy. Was partly a reaction to the two days worth of near constant trolling from @Miss_Snuffy
Katharine, we’ve never seen eye to eye, that doesn’t mean there are parts of your practice I don’t admire.
However...
(Just quickly before I comment on Grime, I realise I’m white and grew up around Dundee 😂 However, my two year Friday night residency playing hip hop, dancehall and afrojamz gives me a slight anecdotal insight into this debate that you lack imo (yes, the wee guy is me!))
The comparisons made between Stormzy and Drill are both lazy and wholly inaccurate. I assume you’ve never listened to Ink, Skengdo or Loski. You haven’t displayed any understanding of the difference between the artists and sadly it appears you don’t feel you need to.