The $2K thing was the most childish lie and anyone could've seen it. Getting you fired for unorthodox opinions is one of their strongest tools and they weren't going to sabotage that with mincome, however temporary. (which is also why Trump COULD lol)
This is also why Dems will never give you a real public option fir health care, by the way. The only reason that exists in Europe and Canada is because we can outright jail you for hate speech so we don't need to bother with indirect threats to your livelihood.
"What about welfare?" That's conditional on you participating in and following the incentives of the system, it isn't just the government paying you $2000 to fuck off. (which is exactly why liberals opposed it when libertarians proposed to convert the former to the latter)
Rather, the contemporary welfare system is much like the privileges of ancient Greek City states. Yes, every citizen had a right to a share of profit brought in by slaves owned directly by the polis, (e.g. Athen's silver mines) but staying a citizen had its own requirements...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Apparently, it was dropped by Greta Thunberg, who didn't realize the implications of it lol. Autists: always on our side, even if they're not. archive.is/7sUd0
Now that No-nut November has begun, it's time to start with the REAL horror stories.
#1, the first thing that ever made me question porn, was an interview with a 🇭🇺 performer who said that 500+ scenes have made English her language for bedroom talk & Hungarian feels "weird."
(not giving names bc the whole point of this is for you all to NOT lookup pornographers)
Imagine being a porno-🌹 thinking that "sex work will still exist in a socialist society" when its so alienating that it makes ESL speakers unable to naturally dirty-talk in their owm native language lol. "Enthusiastic consent" or "abolishing capitalism" can't fix this.
@ktherese2 I don't even know where to start on this. Really wish I was home rn so I could type it all up. But, long story short: 1. He brought his capeshit story techniques into TV drama which laid the foundations for the MCUing of visual media.
1/?
@ktherese2 (compare it to other similar-genre shows from before Buffy like Xena and you'll see what I mean) 2. He gave ua the "snarky" and "quipster" dialogue that has plagued us ever since. It became impossible to take any situation seriously, & eventually studios stopped even trying
2/?
@ktherese2 If you're wondering why, e.g. Nebula's abusive parent backstory in Guardians of the Galaxy has to be immediately followed by an "irreverent sarcastic remark™," its bc otherwise we'd be in danger of feeling something "heavy," and Whedonesque storytelling despises this.
3/?
"But Jackson, how is this relevant to us AMericans in the current ye-"
But, before we get into the book proper, we're doing the intro. As you may guess by the foreboding, Grant correctly intuited that the Anti-Americanism of the 70s was imported from America itself; Canada self-owned by embracing it, bc it defined "Americanism" *on America's terms.*
"Trump has similarly argued that in granting any further aid, the federal government should require states and cities to [...] end sanctuary-city policies in locales that don’t readily cooperate with immigration authorities"
Lincoln won, Mr. @RonBrownstein. DEAL WITH IT.
The bugmen are on the other end of the Jouvenelean vice for once in their lives and suddenly they've realized that Jefferson Davis did nothing wrong lol.
Gonna listen to this now, since, "ability to understand fascism" is one of my litmus tests. I hope @aimeeterese and @BMStudebaker don't fall into any of the pitfalls that A. James Gregor had to refute. (if neither syndicalism nor "proletarian nationalism" are mentioned...)
@aimeeterese@BMStudebaker They understand that it's a democratic phenomenon, at least. Let's see if they name the general will and Rousseau.
@aimeeterese@BMStudebaker They're getting into how fascists see folk communities as anterior to politics. This is good (and why fascism is a species of liberalism) but I'm not sure if they'll be brave enough to mention how this was derived directly from Anglo-empiricist evolutionary biology.