I’ve warned the #Bitcoin Maxis that not even the King 👑 of Crypto #BTC is safe from an out of controlled scared government. I share the views of @RaoulGMI and others about ending the Crypto Tribalism that permeates the Digital Asset industry. A united crypto community is
necessary to withstand the attacks from the outside world, especially from government. Many of you saw my immediate reaction when @HesterPeirce tweeted the 🚨 RISK ALERT 🚨 above and requested feedback. After reviewing it more carefully, I was hoping to find something positive.
Let’s be real, my tweet threads have been a bit negative or even angry lately. But after reading this WARNING, disguised as a “Risk Alert,” my anger turned to genuine fear. Not fear of the @SEC_News or it’s lawyers, but genuine fear that it’s too late to save the United States
from itself. It’s clear that the United States WILL NOT be the leader in global trade and finance moving forward. I now believe that my earlier warnings that @SEC_Enforcement vs. @Ripple, @bgarlinghouse and @chrislarsensf is potentially a signal that the SEC is coming after all
Cryptocurrencies and Digital Assets is, in fact, accurate. Some of you may think that I’m being paranoid and that I’m an alarmist?
If so, please take 20 minutes and read the SEC Risk Alert yourself. In fact, if the SEC didn’t title it as a “Risk Alert,” I wouldn’t even know
what it is. I wouldn’t know how to describe it or what to call it. To understand what I’m getting at, you don’t even have to read past footnote # 1. Here’s that footnote in it’s entirety:
“This statement represents the views of the staff of the Division of Examinations
(formerly known as the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations). It is not a rule, regulation, or not a statement of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”). The Commission has neither approved nor disapproved its content. This statement,
like all staff guidance, has no legal force or effect: it does not alter or amend applicable law, and it creates no new or additional obligations for any person.”
What the hell does that mean?
I will tell you exactly what it means. It means that you and I can NEVER rely on or
use the statements or information contained within this public alert. We can’t even bring it up to be used against the SEC in any possible way.
But the @SEC_Enforcement can use it against us if they choose, and now, it can claim it provided a warning and/or an alert on the
subject before filing an action against any person, business group, or entity. This so-called Risk Alert covers basically all the different categories of cryptocurrencies and all the different potential groups of investors. For example, the Risk Alert states the following:
“This Risk Alert provides observations made by Division staff during examinations of investment advisers, broker-dealers, and transfer agents regarding Digital Asset Securities that may assist firms in developing and enhancing their compliance practices.”
Translation: So, basically, all this Risk Alert does is allow the SEC to later claim that they warned investors, developers, venture capitalists, exchanges, broker dealers, etc that the SEC Enforcement Division may, one day, come after them for noncompliance.
Why do I say that?
Because this Risk Alert also states the following:
“In addition, as more securities industry participants seek to engage in digital asset-related activities, this Risk Alert provides transparency about areas of focus for the Division’s future examinations.”
Future examinations?
Yes, the SEC is letting us all know that they will be bringing more enforcement actions in the future regarding Digital Assets.
So now you may be thinking, but that doesn’t mean the SEC is going to go after all digital assets and cryptocurrencies, Deaton!
So let’s review what
the SEC says on the matter of Digital Assets. In the Risk Alert the SEC further states:
“Digital assets essentially operate on software running across networks of peers that create and maintain shared ledger accounting for holdings of these assets. For purposes of this
statement “forked” refers to backward-incompatible protocol changes to a distributed ledger that create additional versions of the distributed ledger, creating new digital assets. For the purpose of this statement, “airdropped” refers to the distribution of digital assets to
numerous addresses, usually at no monetary cost to the recipient or in exchange for certain promotional or other services.”
Did you read that? Do you understand now? The SEC is putting us on notice that it is in charge of all categories of Digital Assets. Forked Assets included.
Airdropped Assets included. The bottom line is that the SEC can now claim that it warned everyone that they better be in
compliance, whether it’s a forked asset, an airdropped asset, or any version of any digital asset.
The most shocking hypocritical statement in this
Risk Alert is the following:
“The Division understands that, as financial innovation continues, market participants may have
questions as to their regulatory obligations.”
Are you fricking kidding me? Isn’t that exactly what @coinbase and other exchanges did as late as 2019
when they informed the SEC that they were going to list #XRP but wanted to make sure the SEC didn’t consider #XRP a security? Yet, the SEC provided zero guidance and allowed the exchanges to list #XRP in 2019, only to file suit against Ripple and all #XRPHolders.
Now, as feared, the Ripple
enforcement action is really a precursor of the future.
@elonmusk is 💯 percent correct when he states that he considers the SEC a joke and has zero respect for the agency.
Nowhere in this SEC alert is there any real guidance related to Digital
Assets. Unlike the SEC, the U.K. has provided guidance to the industry. See below.
The Cryptocurrency and Digital Asset industry must see what’s happening before our very 👀
CRYPTOCURRENCY AND DIGITAL ASSET HOLDERS PLEASE BE ADVISED
Today, I am launching CryptoLaw (crypto-law.us) The new site is filled with information, news and analysis on key U.S. legal and regulatory developments for investors & digital asset holders.
Many of you
have asked me if there is anything that you can do to support my efforts. First and foremost, I truly appreciate everyone of you that have made such generous offers to assist me.
If you could please check out CryptoLaw above and follow us on Twitter at @CryptoLawUS it would
make a significant contribution in generating attention to our cause. We launched today because of the confirmation hearing of Gary Gensler tomorrow. There is very little communication between the Digital Asset Industry and the law-makers that govern the industry.
Anyone who truly believes in Digital Assets and what the space potentially represents for a revolutionary future should want #Bitcoin to succeed (even if you despise #BTC). #BTC has found it’s purpose.
The @SEC_Enforcement is in utter disarray. As many know, Acting Chairwoman Alison Herren Lee published her directive that conditional settlement offers would no longer be considered when negotiating potential settlements. The next day, @HesterPeirce and Elad Roisman published
a letter publicly disagreeing with Herren Lee and arguing that conditional settlement offers are necessary in achieving fair and adequate resolutions.
Recently, the public received a Risk Alert published by the @SEC_News. For those that didn’t et a chance to review the Risk
Alert, I have included my scathing review. The bottom line is that Gary Gensler is, arguably, the most important SEC Chairman appointment in U.S. history. He is walking into a publicly divided Commission. His predecessor, Jay Clayton, dropped the most significant SEC enforcement
#XRPHOLDERS vs. U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
NOTICE OF PENDING LEGAL ACTION
#XRPCOMMUNITY PLEASE FORWARD TO ANY #XRPHOLDER WHO OWNS #XRP AND WISHES TO JOIN IN THE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT TO BE FILED AGAINST THE SEC
Please be advised that, after I file the lawsuit
I must demonstrate to the Court that I am able to notify the potential members of the class in order to have the case be certified as a class action lawsuit. Pursuant to the Federal Rules:
“The notice may be by one or more of the following: United States mail, electronic means,
or other appropriate means.”
One viable means today is the use of social media. Obviously, Twitter is not going to serve as the only means of communicating to potential members of the class action. But it definitely serves as a good starting point. There are other means
Below is the theory that Clayton, on his way out of the door at the @SEC_Enforcement, sent a big f**k you to @Ripple@bgarlinghouse and @chrislarsensf because he was sick and tired of the reach that Ripple had with important Politicians. Ripple got the attention of Senators,
Congressmen, and National Security Advisors. I’ve personally been involved with and witnessed how you get the attention of Politicians: 💰
According to @Cointelegraph, “Ripple Labs spent $690,000 on lobbying in the United States in 2020. Ripple's lobbying program dwarfed those
of other firms in the crypto industry. Coinbase, which looks to become the first American crypto exchange to issue public shares, spent $230,000 over the same year, while other exchanges like @binance@Gemini and @krakenfx . did not report any spending on lobbying.”
Based on the recent revelations coming from the PreTrial Hearing articulated by @XRPcryptowolf, I intend to repost my Tweet Threads discussing the possible corrupt motives behind Jay Clayton authorizing the @SEC_Enforcement action against @Ripple,
Please understand that the possible alternative corrupt motives that I discuss isn’t me just Tweeting things that people want to hear or for attention - as a few have claimed. The corrupt alternative motives I discuss in my tweets are actually
contained in my Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Memorandum of Support that I
FILED IN FEDERAL COURT.
So, to my critics, I’m not tweeting or saying anything that I’m not willing to say ON THE RECORD in OPEN COURT to a federal judge.