🇵🇱⚖️🇪🇺Today's CJEU judgment regarding Poland, a FAQ:

Where did this case come from?

It’s a referral from the Polish Supreme Administrative Court. Which means that the CJEU was limited to answering judicial questions from the Polish court.
(1/6)
What is it about?

In a nutshell, it’s about judges who were almost appointed to the Polish Supreme Court, but a series of legislative amendments, changes to the National Council of Judiciary and decisions by the President left them ultimately shut out of the appointment.
(2/6)
What did the CJEU say?

In plain words: it’s quite possible that this legal and institutional scaffolding is contrary to EU law, and if you, the referring Polish court, were to find so, apply the principle of EU law primacy and disregard domestic norms that violate EU law.
(3/6)
Is this CJEU tossing the problem over to the Polish court?

Mostly. It seems that once again, the CJEU is skirting around an outright statement that the Polish NCJ is not an independent body and that the integrity of Polish judiciary has been compromised.
(4/6)
What will be the consequences?

Directly? Little. The Polish government is at this point outright ignoring the CJEU in other cases, let alone the fact that it’s disregarding Polish courts. There's little hope that a decision by the referring court would have any impact.
(5/6)
Indirectly? Hopefully, this brings us one step closer to decisive elaboration on the state of Polish judiciary in an infringement case brought by the Commission. The fact that this case was "just" a referral might be the reason why CJEU held back from firing any big guns.
(6/6)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jakub Jaraczewski

Jakub Jaraczewski Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @J_Jaraczewski

22 Oct 20
🤰🇵🇱⚖️🧵Polish Constitutional Tribunal has ruled that #abortion due to defects of the foetus is unconstitutional. These days the global trend is to liberalise abortion laws, but it is 2020 so here we are with an effective ban on 98% of legal abortions in Poland. (1/6)
It is not the first time the Polish Constitutional Tribunal is doing a reverse Roe vs Wade. For a brief moment in mid-90s, abortion was allowed on social and personal grounds. This #law was struck down by the CT in 1997. (2/6)
The two remaining grounds for abortion are: a threat to the health of the woman or the pregnancy being a result of sexual assault/incest. Legal abortions on these grounds are exceedingly rare. (3/6)
Read 6 tweets
20 Oct 20
🇵🇱⚖️🧵
So, what’s the deal with the Polish #ombudsman’s term and the Constitutional Tribunal ruling on that?
The Polish #NHRI, ombudsman, Commissioner for Civil Rights, a man of many talents, @Adbodnar, was appointed for a 5-year term according to the Polish #Constitution. (1/7)
The appointment of an ombudsman requires a vote in BOTH chambers of the Polish #parliament – the lower one, Sejm (controlled by the ruling party) and the upper one, Senat (controlled by the opposition). Currently, this means a deadlock on any contentious candidacy. (2/7)
What happens if both chambers of the parliament can’t agree? The #Constitution is silent on this, but according to the #law on the ombudsman, the incumbent stays in the office until the parliament decides. Which means that Adam Bodnar is now an on an “extended” term. (3/7)
Read 7 tweets
7 May 20
So what the hell just happened in Poland last night? Thread. 🧵⚖️🇵🇱

1. At 10 PM, the presidential elections scheduled for the 10th of May were supposed to be carried out by postal voting, but the law on organising these elections was still in the Senate. (1/10)
2. Half an hour later, the leader and co-leader of the ruling "coalition-but-party", announced that new elections will be called immediately after the Polish Supreme Court ... finds the 10th of May elections invalid due to not having taken place. (2/10)
3. Yes, you read that right, it's two politicians who are NOT members of the government declaring that elections (organised by the government) will not take place and they know that the Supreme Court will find them invalid. (3/10)
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!