Thanks for asking, friend! I'm happy to answer. First though, note that what we voted was simply to say that prisoners can vote. And as you know well, most prisoners are convicted of more trivial offenses.
1/ And as I'm sure you're well aware, our prison system massively over-incarcerates minorities, typically for low-level crimes that white men like me never get arrested for.
2/ Note this has nothing to do with whether or not people should do the time if they did the crime. It's simply saying that we cannot and should not use our prison system as a back-door to disenfranchisement.
3/ As you may recall, our country used to enslave people. When we ended slavery, we had a brief period of reconstruction when blacks could vote, but that threat to southern white power led to the Jim Crow era. Google "lynching and disenfranchisement" if you need a refresher.
4/ It took nearly 100 years and Emmet Till's murder but Americans finally decided they had enough. Freedom riders deseregrated buses and lunch counters and finally brought an end to the Jim Crow era. But the legacy of our original sin remained.
5/ And thus began the era of mass incarceration of black men. Read up on Nixon, or Reagan's war on drugs. Here's some information to start: sentencingproject.org/publications/c…
6/ Highly recommend The New Jim Crow which gives a great synopsis of this history. If you're more in the mood for a movie, watch Just Mercy. Or take a trip Alabama to visit the Legacy Museum. It is powerful, and painful but necessary. museumandmemorial.eji.org
7/ The fact is, we cannot separate our history of active disenfranchisement of minorities since the passage of the 15th Amendment which is inseparable from mass incarceration.
8/ That in turn cripples our economy. The black/white unemployment gap which has historically run 2x (e.g., black unemployment rates 2x white) is actually closer to 3x once we take into account differential incarceration rates.
9/ And it also hurts our democracy. If you're a member of Congress with a prison in your district, those prisoners count in the census so set the people you represent, but they don't get to vote. That is at odds with the principle of proportional representation in the House.
10/ In short, I love our democracy. I want people to vote. But I am also keenly aware of our history of racial disenfranchisement. The job @LaurenUnderwood and I have requires us to work to ensure a more perfect union.
11/ We voted today with full knowledge of that history, and that aspiration. We voted to remove those tools that allow politicians to choose their voters rather than be chosen by their voters. Sorry if that bums you out. /fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sean Casten

Sean Casten Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SeanCasten

28 Feb
We need to end the damned filibuster. And we need to stop pretending that a 50/50 division in a body that was designed to over-represent land at the expense of people reflects a divided US electorate.
Fact: The Senate, by design only represents 98.7% of the American electorate (because it excludes DC and the territories, which are represented in the House)
For comparison, WY, VT, AK, ND and SD represent fewer Americans than live in DC and the territories. And they get 10 votes (10% of the total!)
Read 5 tweets
27 Feb
Early this morning, we passed the #AmericanRescuePlan.

It's critically needed and the Senate must act now to get these resources into our economy to help struggling families and businesses, accelerate vaccine roll-out and safely reopen our schools.

A few important things:
1/ The single biggest line item in the bill is for direct, $1400 checks to people earning $75,000 or less ($150,000 for couples). $1400 per earner and each of their dependents.
2/ (If you earn more than these levels the amount of the payment scales down to zero at $100K/$200K), to ensure this is targeted to the neediest.)
Read 21 tweets
26 Feb
OK, so this gets me a little verklempt. Herewith a true story about two of the most special moments in the 116th Congress - the first Congress for me and my friend @SpanbergerVA07. Sharing because it's a nice story and we need more nice stories. Thread:
1/ So one of the weirder things about this job is that all votes "feel" the same. Lots of debate, drama, press before & after (some) votes, but the process of pressing yay or nay is the same on a post office renaming as it is on a $5T appropriation.
2/ Intuitively, of course we know some are more meaningful. But the feedback is usually delayed. My first experience of anything different was the vote on the #EqualityAct in the 116th.
Read 16 tweets
25 Feb
Hey #energytwitter! Been a while since I rapped at ya. How about a thread on how the securitization of undepreciated coal plant capital can accelerate the greening of the electric grid? (Honestly, if that doesn't keep you to keep reading, I can't help you.) Here we go:
1. Triggered by this piece this morning about efforts to do so in Wisconsin. energynews.us/2021/02/25/mid…
2. To understand why this is necessary, you need to understand that under the traditional regulated utility construct, a utility invests capital in exchange for a guaranteed rate of return, earned through kWh sales.
Read 14 tweets
20 Feb
Since you'll need a 2/3 majority, I'd encourage you not to skip over the bits about a "well regulated militia" and "bear arms" and ask why our founders chose that specific language. Then read Justice Stevens: law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-…
You'll also want to consider why our founders chose the language in the final 2A while expressly rejecting this proposal from Pennsylvania:
And you'll want to examine why the Virginia proposal, which formed the basis of the final text initially included a religious exemption for "bearing arms", since our founders understood that term to be compulsory rather than voluntary.
Read 4 tweets
16 Feb
For those wondering what the causes are of Texas blackouts, @JesseJenkins is doing a really good real time analysis of generator capacity and operation. (Short story: we have a natural gas problem in TX). A few additional thoughts to add:
1/ As Jesse notes, natural gas is somewhat unique in that it is both a power plant fuel and a home heating fuel. When cold weather comes, regulators bias in favor of heating rather than power generation.
2/ New England - a region that is both cold and has long been more reliant than others on natural gas for power generation - has had to grapple with this for a long time.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!