This is interesting. What overlap is there between the followers of mainstream charities and grassroots orgs concerned with gender ideology? 
The groups that minusplnp call "anti trans" follow the mainstream orgs, but the mainstream orgs don't follow back
Partly this is big orgs/small orgs social media managers/activists...
Partly this is big orgs/small orgs social media managers/activists...
But partly it's a result of this kind of thing - external and internal policing against following "TERFS"
What is it that the organisations at the bottom have in common?
It is that they are trying to blow the whistle ⚠️on the safeguarding risks from sex denialism.
What do the groups on the other side have in common ? 💰and 🙉
They are not listening
It is that they are trying to blow the whistle ⚠️on the safeguarding risks from sex denialism.
What do the groups on the other side have in common ? 💰and 🙉
They are not listening
So what's going on here?
Is the fact that orgs refuse to listen to safeguarding concerns a ,?sign that there are no risks and harms
Or a sign that the big orgs are not facing up to them because their staff don't want to be outcast and join the "unfollowed"
Is the fact that orgs refuse to listen to safeguarding concerns a ,?sign that there are no risks and harms
Or a sign that the big orgs are not facing up to them because their staff don't want to be outcast and join the "unfollowed"
Here is the source thread:
https://twitter.com/minusplnp/status/1366460569449021441?s=19
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
