The initial PIT reductions only applies to wage, salary, retirement, and unemployment income, not business income, investment income, farm income, etc. If the goal is economic growth, no relief for small businesses or entrepreneurs is surprising (and nonneutral).
2/
In fact, small business owners would face higher taxation, not only still facing current PIT rates, but paying a higher sales tax that now applies to business purchases (legal, accounting, advertising, data processing, other professional services).
3/
There's also a "luxury items tax" on select high-dollar goods. We don't know what the list is yet. I'm assuming it's not everything above a $5K threshold (surely a used car isn't a luxury), but are business purchases in or not?
4/
Sales taxes are supposed to fall broadly on personal consumption. Excise taxes impose special rates on certain transactions because they have social costs (externalities) to capture or function as a user-pays system. A luxury tax doesn't fit either approach.
5/
There are a bunch of excise tax increases. Notable seems to be a much higher soft drink tax (6 cents / can or per 16.9 oz) and a cigarette tax almost 4x Virginia's and ~$1 higher than KY or OH. (WV has most smokers of any state, many are lower income, many live by borders.)
6/
The sales tax rate rises from 6.0 to 7.9%, which is high but not extremely high. On its own, probably a good trade for many taxpayers for PIT reductions -- especially since there's going to be some sort of rebate for low-income households. (Unsure of details, but worth $52M.)
7/
But there's a lot to dig into here. Major changes to severance taxes, too. At first glance, this reduces liability for many WV taxpayers, but shifts much of the burden onto businesses. That complicates the growth expectations.
8/
If you work in the DC metro area, suddenly are mostly teleworking, and those country roads appeal to you, this sounds like a great deal for you -- even better if full repeal happens. But if WV wants to attract business activity as well, it's at best a mixed bag.
9/
It's genuinely exciting that WV policymakers are interested in comprehensive tax reform, and shifting to more of a consumption base is pro-growth and worth doing. It's good to get this discussion going. But the tradeoffs I've outlined here matter and merit consideration.
10/
I look forward to seeing bill text, and also seeing what the House and Senate come up with. For now, here's the abstract for the governor's plan: governor.wv.gov/Documents/Gove…
/FIN
Update: bill text is now available on Gov. Justice's WV income tax phaseout proposal.
A benefit that (combined with state regular UC) gets most people to about 95% salary replacement through September seems better than one that gets most >100% but expires sooner. But exempting the first $10,200 from tax creates problems. Short thread.
(1) Many people have already filed and will have to file amended returns. Making benefits available as long as needed seems way more important than this complicated retroactive provision, which requires changing tax forms or instructions.
(2) Thirty-five states tax UC and will get about $13B from that this year. Most follow the feds on this, so the exemption will affect them as well. It lowers revenue -- and again, amended return issues, and states have to change their systems very late in the process.
Almost half the states saw revenue increases during the pandemic. Typically not as high as projected, but sometimes exceeding projections. Losses frequently way less than aid. So what do you spend it on if you didn't lose much revenue? Lots and lots of rural broadband? 2/
I understand Congress not wanting states to turn this into tax cuts (though if you give states money they don't need...), but what about states already planning a tax cut? Surely Congress can't ban state tax cuts through 2024. There could be some interesting adjudication. 3/
While it's true that the coronavirus relief bill doesn't have anything designated as state and local aid, there's actually about $127 billion in there that can shore up state budgets -- which, remember, were down only $37 billion total through the end of September. 1/
The $82B in additional education grants and $45B for transportation projects has to be spent on education and transportation, but it's not contingent on states maintaining their own spending levels. They can use that federal infusion to redirect their own revenues. 2/
This is the primary way the federal government provided aid to state governments during the Great Recession -- by upping its contribution to Medicaid, education, and transportation, freeing up state dollars for other uses (including backfilling budgets). 3/
- Biden outlines essentially a natural law viewpoint, with courts to uphold God-given rights prior to and above written law
- He seems to situate abortion within these God-given rights
- But he believes abortion is against God's will
Here he spells out something that looks pretty similar to a natural law philosophy. He just says "natural rights" but emphasizes that they're God-given and believes them prior to and above human law, but enforceable by human courts:
Biden seems to situate abortion within this natural rights / natural law framework:
If people who throw axes while under the influence of alcohol are going "nah, too dangerous for me," your reopening is going to take a while. bisnow.com/atlanta/news/r…
When and how to lift business restrictions is a really complicated issue, and I don't have the answer. Georgia's doing it faster than seems advisable to me, but lots of other states are starting phased re-openings. A few notes:
1. Even if you think that reopening now is an atrocious idea, don't assume those who disagree are doing it out of indifference to human suffering. There's an awful lot of suffering due to closures too. Balancing that is tough. People can get it wrong without being evil.
Today we launched a visual guide to unemployment benefit claims, which we will be updating weekly with each Thursday's data release. The numbers are sobering. A few notes on understanding these figures: 1/ taxfoundation.org/unemployment-i…
Timing matters a lot. It will take at least another 1-2 weeks to have a strong sense of which states are facing the worst crisis. Right now there are challenges in disentangling timing of closure orders, pace of processing UI claims, reporting lags, from larger considerations. 2/
So, for instance, we know that some states initially couldn't keep pace with the benefit claims coming in. A comparatively modest (nothing is low) increase in those states is hardly good news. 3/