1./ Why is it so difficult to increase production of one of the new mRNA vaccines? This is a brilliant step-by-step explanation of Pfizer's challenges; and a great piece of science journalism by @JaredSHopkins and colleagues @WSJ👇wsj.com/articles/mrna-…
2./ It turns out it's really hard to make virus sized particles of mRNA but then they also have to be coated with lipid (fat) molecules. Cue production bottlenecks. Most of Pfizer's nanolipids are made by one small family firm in Austria! 👇wsj.com/articles/if-on…
3./ Last week @naomirwolf spread garbage about how nanoparticles are a danger. They're actually a wonder of science designed at the atomic level. You can fit 100 000 of them in the thickness of a single newspaper page! They are not "receiving updates" as Wolf claimed.🤦♂️😂
4./ The nanolipids fuse with the cells of our body and because they disguise the mRNA ..allow our cells to take up the active ingredients of the vaccine. Brilliant scientists like @kkariko spent decades trying to finesse this technology. 👇edition.cnn.com/2020/12/16/us/…
5./ We owe her and a generation of scientists working at the nano level a debt of gratitude. Their work will save millions. Unlike the rantings of Naomi Wolf. Next time maybe Naomi can put her thoughts straight into the bin. It would certainly cut out the middle man (or woman).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1./ Would you TRUST the Scottish govt with women's rights? I only ask because @HumzaYousaf has suddenly written to the Justice Committee about how misogyny is being actively considered for inclusion as a Hate Crime ....err....after the election.👇
2./ Obviously it can't possibly be considered NOW on the eve of the Hate Crime Bill vote next Wednesday. Perish the thought! In a Bill that's been slashed apart and sewn back like Frankenstein for months, he suggests misogyny needs another year of very careful consideration. Mmm
3./ It's up to women to decide if they TRUST this process. A clue might lie in who's running the consultation. That'll be Baroness Helena Kennedy. Is this the same Helena Kennedy who defended Naomi Wolf's recent and egregiously inaccurate book, 'Outrages'👇
1./ Naomi Wolf's latest outburst raises a simple question. Do you HAVE to be barking to believe in Self-ID? After all, she's a noted champion of the idea any man who says he's a woman must be believed. She's also currently baking anti-vaxx fruitcake on social media.👇
2./ Her lunatic anti-vaxx claims are fuelled by rumour and her own deep misunderstanding of science. She's even claimed the vaccines insert code into people's bodies that can be updated (inside them) and this is linked to time travel. They don't and they're not.🤦♂️
3./ Yet it was ONLY 3 months ago this same woman was lauded as a rational expert by those kindergarten rejects Pink News who love to attack lesbians like @BluskyeAllison or @bindelj but seem to have a soft spot for a straight woman with FABULOUS hair and a head full of idiocy.👇
1./ Is Scotland a one party state? Not according to @MrJohnNicolson. Really? A leader accused of illegally trying to jail a political opponent? TICK. Her partner running the governing party? TICK. Hundreds of lobbyists funded to applaud her policies as an echo-chamber?. TICK. 👇
2./ Organised trolling of journalists who dare to question her (such as Marr)? TICK. Bullying pickets outside broadcasters? TICK. Top prosecutors accused of doing her bidding and being corrupt? TICK. A booming personality cult? TICK. Remember this lovely birthday tribute? 🤢👇
3./ Dodgy cover-ups like the Nike outbreak and care home deaths? TICK. Unconvincing reports cobbled together to exonerate her? TICK. Democratic structures of her party (the NEC) stuffed with unelected reps? TICK. Laws proposed to silence opponents such as a Hate Crime Bill? TICK.
1./ It's Linehan as we've never seen her. I'm so impressed tho not aroused (probably cos I'm not a lesbian). Apparently some peeps who're every bit as biologically male as Gigi (as we now call her) are offended by her inclusion on lesbian dating sites. Can't we all be kind?
👇👇
2./ There just isn't enough inclusion and diversity in the world; tho things are definitely looking up now that Chiyo Gomez is competing for Mr Gay England. He says he wants to prove gay men can have a vagina and periods too. So bold. So brave. 👇attitude.co.uk/article/mr-gay…
3./ There's no news yet whether Linehan has taken any more hormones than that fabulous icon of womanhood Alex Drummond, ie none at all. Alex...is the Stonewall trans advisor who went into schools to clarify to kids exactly what a lesbian is. So bold. So brave.👇
1./ The vaccine hypocrisy of G7 leaders is breathtaking. They make it sound like they care SO very much about deaths in the developing world. Actually, their priority is about eradicating COVID globally in order to protect us; their own citizens. theguardian.com/world/2021/feb…
2./ That's understandable. The downside is they're asking African and other leaders to mount national vaccination campaigns (with all the effort that entails) when those nations have much more pressing health concerns of their own; like neo-natal deaths.👇 who.int/news-room/fact…
3./ 7000 new born babies die EVERY DAY across the world and EVERY YEAR 2.1M children die in the first month of life; almost as many people as have died from COVID so far globally. 5% of deaths in Africa are from HIV, another 5% from malaria, both entirely preventable.
1./ @OzKaterji appears to be running a masterclass in narcissism. If you hadn't heard of him (I confess I hadn't) then he's the mouthy bloke that just smacked down a polite request from two lesbians who've spent much of their life fighting for LGB rights with abusive comments. 👇
2./ Now he's having a meltdown and anyone who accuses him of homophobia is threatened with legal action. But as a gay man I ask myself who really says to two lesbians, "fuck you and fuck you forever" and "I despise you". The idea that this is normal behaviour is absurd. 👇
3./ Scour through the comments of @ALLIANCELGB and you'll fail to find anything remotely abusive. That's why Oz has to dredge up a tweet from a founder from before the organisation began (Oct 2019) that defended feminists who decide to engage with the Right. But here's the thing.