Thread by @QOrigins

LIN WOOD TELEGRAM UPDATE:

At 9:13 AM, Lin posted that he was going to drop a document that would change the world: PROOF that Mike Pence is guilty of unimaginative...

I mean, unimaginaBLE crimes.

Come with me on a voyage, children. Learn how serious & competent Lin Wood is.

Now, you would think he would just post the TRANSCRIPT at 9:13 or thereabouts. But no. He didn't post squat.

He knows *how* -- just like *I* know how to specify that all of this happened on March 3rd but mysteriously forgot to put it in the first tweet.

So I sympathize a BIT.

"But Origins," you say, "Lin is an old man. DOES he really know how to post documents on Telegram?"

Absolutely! Because he posted two other PDFs -- like this one -- and still no sign of a PDF on the feed.

Possibly, for reasons we will get to in a sec, he posted & deleted. But:

The first appearance of the transcript on his feed (at least the first one that remains intact NOW) is at 10:38 AM, when he posted content from *another* person which purports to be the whistleblowers testimony.

In the interim he appealed for funds and posted 2 other documents.

At 10:53 he posted an article from the Populist Press (a site that @mmfa has referred as Steve Bannon's "newsletter," and it was indeed being hyped by Bannon's media properties within days of its launch) referencing his claims.

But still no Lin-provided transcript, unTIL...

Waaait forrrrr iiiit...

"I another mistake" (sic), wrote Wood, "and did not react the court reporter's name from the whistleblower transcript. Law & Crime... started asking her questions.... The transcript below has been redacted... Law & Crime will have to look elsewhere."

No, see, it WON'T have to look elsewhere. It *already found her*, Lin.

Time is linear. It moves in one direction only.

You can't unfuck this turkey, buddy.

I'm not gonna delve into the "whistleblower" transcript because A) it's 1:00 and B) I am frankly feeling pretty eye-rolly about QAnon content right now, and this material deserves a *serious* look instead of a dismissive scoff -- I should effortpost, not shitpost.

So instead...

Let me close with a question.

If you REALLY WERE a whistleblower whose life was in danger, would you look at this sequence of events and say, "I want the 'I a mistake' guy to represent me, if he can find time between fundraising appeals & updates on his disciplinary hearings?"

UPDATE: I have looked at the interview. Surprise! It's wet garbage.

It starts with the "whistleblower's" claim to have 4 graduate degrees, but you can't PROVE he really does bc Rod Rosenstein *personally* tried to get the records purged & goes downhill from there.