Short version, with comment, of Li Keqiang's Government Work Report today at China's National People's Congress. More details on 14th FYP by early next week. Try this for starters. 1/ 11
Leaving aside backward looking parts of the GWR, with emphasis on the positive economic consequences of containing the pandemic and on eradication of poverty, the forward-looking parts were rather sober overall. 2/11
Contrary to expectations, the govt did announce a growth target of 'about 6 per cent', but in 2021, hitting this target will be like falling off a log in a fast flowing river. Li said there will be annual targets for economic growth. Hmmm 3/11
Setting targets suggests the govt's commitment to sustaining the current growth and development model is proving hard to dilute. Not good. While govt will wind down fiscal, monetary and credit stimulus, even tighten in2021, the addition to stimulus prob still there 4/ 11
Once pandemic pop is done, govt could well revert to using credit and infrastructure again to sustain higher economic growth than economy might be capable of delivering. file under 'Review all this in the autumn'. 5/11
Commitments to raise spending on R&D, defence, and science and technology are as expected. References to the 3 year action plan to reform SOEs and extend hukou more rapidly lack specifics at this stage, and we have heard all this before 6/ 11
The targets to lower energy consumption per unit of output and CO2 emissions are welcome, and will be interesting to monitor. Most other targets and tasks were flagged and are remarkable more as goals than policies. Again, we will have to wait for details as/ when.or if. 7/ 11
Vague commitments to ensure an 'appropriate' birth rate, and implement a 'phased increase' in the statutory retirement age are tantalising and long overdue gestures to address rapid ageing, but what on earth does the former mean. Latter is getting urgent. 8/11 .
All in all, this GWR fits the script of 'taking stock' after a testing and turbulent 2020 because of Covid, and the tasks for 2021 are now a pay down on the new Five Year Plan, and the target 2035 ambition to become a modern socialist economy. 9/ 11
People will want to learn much more about a few things eg Dual Circulation Strategy & what that means in practice; how the $1.4 trn 5 yr science/tech programme is going to rolled out and funded; whether lower regs and charges for firms also come with bigger market access 10/11
Also note Li said that to ensure national security, economic security will require strategies to safeguard food supplies, energy, resources, and financial security. The whole security thing is going to define and etermine a lot in the next few years. 11/11 End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hooray, I have found a soul mate in @CapEconomics whose latest rpt says 'Our long-run forecasts suggest that China will still be the second largest economy, measured at market exchange rates, in 2050'. My view too. Read on /1
They say that if China hasn't overtaken the US by 2030, it won't. and even if it did, the bragging rights might not last (my words). They say China's poorer demographics and output per worker are the key drivers of this non consensus view. I think there's more /2
So I would add 2 things. First, the prod'ty part of this is key. I'm also more optimistic that US economic structure, assets and strengths still give it an edge, along with politics permitting more robust institutions and stronger tech branding and commercialising capability /3
Thread on saving (mostly older peoples) lives v economy. Spoiler: rant because a lot of ppl incl on @BBCr4today misunderstand or misrepresent this. There is no choice. 1/n
Ppl, incl a Bristol Univ Prof in risk mgt, say economic slumps are injurious to health and we have the balance wrong. We should protect economy more and presumably be more tolerant of higher cv fatalities. 2/n
It’s true that slumps take a heavy toll on physical and mental health. Which is partly why we have well developed if not always adequately funded social sec and healthcare progs. But in today’s cv world, the deaths vs economy argument is a total red herring and wrong 3/n
On HK protest movement against the E law, lots of thoughts swirling around. No question it’s been a huge boost for HKers, who must feel buoyed that if the govt or Beijing persist in erosion of civil liberties, they know what to do. Yet, this is ultimately toxic for the CCP 1/n
At same time, also no question that this is the biggest climb down Xi Jinping has made since coming to power. The all-powerful, truck no nonsense, leader of China has had to bow to street politics. This will not have made him happy or quiescent.2/n
Under the circumstances though, and with a G20 coming up in Osaka next week, he had no choice. Interesting though, that faced with international and domestic pushback, the gov has virtually eradicated Made in China 25 rhetoric, moderated its Belt and Road strategy (pro tem) 3/n
Remarkable graphic showing that even though China rebalancing has made some progress, it is light years away and structurally a country mile from its developed and emerging peers. 1/n
Though China has GDP per capita about same as Brazil, its consumption per capita is comparable to Nigeria. Can you imagine? Not what you see in glitzy Shanghai or Shenzhen, but a truism regardless. Now look at the debate about rebalancing and reform, and you'll see.... 2/n
....the emptiness of the agenda on what's needed to really move China from top left to middle or bottom left in the chart (first tweet). Of course, as the investment rate drops away, pushing growth much lower, the Consumption share will rise, but that's just maths, and not... 3/n
Been pitching Red Flags in U.K. and at a private China and the world conference for invitees only/Chatham house rules conference out of town. Can’t say much but some impressions:
The pro-China lobby in the US has evaporated, and it’s on life support elsewhere. This is a huge thing. Think about the last 2-3 decades as comparison 2/n
Xi Jinping has committed 2 cardinal errors. Losing the support of US especially but also EU businesses, and misreading the fortitude of the WH on prosecuting this trade conflict. Major fails. Someone’s going to pay for this, and it’s a loooong way back for XJP 3/n