This amendment would have barred all federal funding to schools and colleges that let ANY trans women or girls participate in women and girls' sports under any circumstances. Needed 60 votes, got 49. Murkowski and Manchin were only two Senators to flip.
And please don't come into my mentions defending this proposal on the grounds that trans women and girls' participation in sports is a complicated or hard question, because this proposal doesn't treat it as a complicated or hard question.
The premise of the Tuberville amendment is that the exclusion of trans women and girls from women's sports in educational settings should be absolute, and that the budgetary power of the federal government should be used to police that exclusion.
The position the amendment takes is an absolutist anti-trans position. And the project of creating space for difficult conversations is not advanced by allying oneself with reactionary lawmakers' absolutist stances.
Since folks have asked, my own view is that various governments and institutional bodies seem to be doing a pretty good job of coming up with procedures for facilitating trans inclusion in a sensible way, and that I'm happy to mostly watch and learn as that process unfolds.
If you have critiques of the specifics of those various approaches and want to roll up your sleeves and dig in on the specifics of policymaking in this arena, by all means go for it. But the Tuberville amendment isn't that. Not by a long shot.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Less than one percent of the cost of the bill. Manchin seems to be deciding that "occasionally being an asshole for no reason" is how he's going to make his mark between now and 2022.
And this really does seem to me to be a solid counterexample to the "Biden is using Manchin as a fig leaf to pursue his real goals" theory. (Which may well be legit in other contexts.)
There's no actual reason for anyone but Manchin to prefer the Manchin path here. It doesn't save money, create a better narrative, or target spending in any serious way. It's just a mechanism for Manchin to get a meaningless victory at the expense of Biden and the national party.
So since @conor64 has QTed this in a weird way, let me say a bit more about it. My claim isn't—I think CLEARLY isn't—that McNeil "harmed" the teenagers in any way. It's that he was a poor choice of ambassador because he's not good at communicating with young people of their ilk.
I don't think McNeil's big sin in the Peru story is being evil. I think that his big sin is being an out-of-touch self-satisfied old doofus. And I say that as someone with out-of-touch self-satisfied old doofus tendencies myself.
When McNeil showed up in Peru quoting Tom Lehrer, making Jewish mother jokes, and saying "but what about blackface when BLACK people use it in AFRICA?", it was pretty much inevitable that he was going to come off as an annoying old weirdo.
Reading McNeil's posts, it does seem clear that he was pretty much fired, or at the very least that he quit in the face of a major, imminent, intentionally humiliating demotion.
But it's also really really clear that he should never have been assigned to that student trip to Peru, and that the fact that it blew up in his, and the Times', face was entirely foreseeable.
Since Al Franken is trending again, let's remember that the allegations against him were multiple, varied, and serious, that he admitted to misconduct before resigning, and that even his coworkers andallies have described a longtime pattern of inappropriate behavior.
And if you're going to come into my mentions to argue that Al Franken was railroaded out of office in a way that should serve as a cautionary tale, please read this thread first. He gave his colleagues no basis on which to support him. FOR WEEKS.
I thought Franken was a really strong senator, by the way. I did my bit to help him get elected in his first campaign. And no, I don't think what he did was as bad as what Trump has done. And yet.
This is an extremely strange denial from Governor Cuomo. It ignores most of Lindsey Boylan's allegations, contradicts a claim that she didn't make, and offers a rebuttal from four staffers without so much as asserting that they're in a position to make such a rebuttal reliably.
Boylan makes a series of allegations against Cuomo today, and the only one his office denies specifically isn't close to being the most serious. And again, that one denial is highly misleading. medium.com/@lindseyboylan…
Cuomo's office says, as if it's somehow damning, that Boylan was never alone with Cuomo, a press aide, and a state trooper on a October 2017 flight. But she doesn't say she was, just that on the flight in question "His press aide was to my right and a state trooper behind us."