At the Javits Center for my first shot. Will update.
Arrived at the 36th Street Javits entrance at 2:42. Line extended past the entrance, but only barely—was in the building within about a minute.
About ten minutes after getting in the building, they checked my appointment sheet printout, then put me on the next line.
Lines are orderly, distanced, and moving pretty quick—at least as much walking as standing, so far.
Just got out of the Javits Center lobby and into another huge room that’s all line.
(Livetweeting mostly for other New Yorkers who may be poking around Twitter for info on what to expect. Happy to answer any and [nearly] all questions.)
They’re taking people in arrival order, not appointment order. They say not to arrive more than an hour early, but I don’t know if that’s being enforced.
Better than any other line I’ve been in in NYC, and mask compliance is literally 100%. It helps that there are six-foot-distance dots the whole length of the line.
From what I’ve seen, Tuesday specifically was a shitshow—far worse than before or since.
Staffing is pretty much all uniformed military, with 100% mask compliance among them, too. Big difference from my NYPD experiences this last year.
Fun fact: The after-the-lobby room has 18 switchbacks, so you can estimate wait time by timing each switchback and multiplying. Currently averaging about 2.5 minutes per.
(I think it’s 18. May be one or two more.)
No bag check, BTW. I tried and failed this morning to find out if there’s a contraband list. They’re handing out bottles of water near the end of the line.
They’re being real stringent about not letting people take photos.
Just about to the front of the line, an hour and thirty-seven minutes after arrival on site.
Very quick check-in process—just reviewing ID and appointment form—then onto another line.
No chairs and no place to sit. There’s a box to click on the form if you have difficulty walking or standing for long periods, so that’s definitely something to address in advance.
When we checked in they asked if we were both getting vaxxed, so they’re definitely fine with people accompanying loved ones.
Two hours after arrival on site, we’re almost to the end of the last line.
Done!
They took us in together, so we were vaxxed at the same table. The folks who processed us and gave us the jab were super lovely.
And the cards they gave us are our tickets for the second dose, three weeks from today. Same process, no separate processing, but we can come at any time during the day.
For anyone Twitter searching “Javits Center for info on the vax, scroll up from here. I just livetweeted my experience and answered a bunch of questions.
Boom.
Someone else's livetweet from yesterday at the Javits Center—she arrived about 40 minutes after I did, waited about 20 minutes longer because the line stretched outside a bit.
From what I've heard in replies to this thread, outer-borough NYC megavax sites seem to have much shorter lines than Javits, so if you can get in at one of those it's probably a better bet. But Javits was pretty much fine—just a slog.
(Feeling fine this morning, BTW—a bit of soreness in the upper arm, but that's all. Any other issues much more likely due to walking ten miles yesterday than to the shot itself. [And yes, they say the second shot is the doozy.])
And just received an automated confirmation of my appointment for the second shot, three weeks from yesterday. The email says to go at the same time, but a guy at the site said you'll be let in any time that day if you can't make the same slot for the second dose.
Probably best logistically, all things being equal, to go at the same time so they can predict volume, but I'm planning to poke around Twitter in the lead-up and see what times of day seem to be slowest, and maybe plan on doing that.
And I guess I'll say again: If anyone has any questions about how the Javits Center setup works, feel free to ask—Mel and I were talking on the way home last night about how much more relaxed the second dose visit will be, just because we know what to expect and how to prepare.
Oh, one other weird thing: The nurse giving the shots told us not to take NSAIDs (Advil, Motrin, etc.) if we had pain, and I looked it up after—apparently one study has found that they may reduce effectiveness of the vaccine somewhat.
Annoyingly, there was no warning about that in the materials we got in advance, and M and I both took an Aleve before leaving the house. It seems the effect is probably minor, though, and we won't take anything around the second dose.
Yeah, there's a thing in the signup form that asks if you're taking steroids, but nothing about NSAIDs that I can recall.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Angus Johnston

Angus Johnston Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @studentactivism

6 Mar
This amendment would have barred all federal funding to schools and colleges that let ANY trans women or girls participate in women and girls' sports under any circumstances. Needed 60 votes, got 49. Murkowski and Manchin were only two Senators to flip.
And please don't come into my mentions defending this proposal on the grounds that trans women and girls' participation in sports is a complicated or hard question, because this proposal doesn't treat it as a complicated or hard question.
The premise of the Tuberville amendment is that the exclusion of trans women and girls from women's sports in educational settings should be absolute, and that the budgetary power of the federal government should be used to police that exclusion.
Read 6 tweets
3 Mar
Less than one percent of the cost of the bill. Manchin seems to be deciding that "occasionally being an asshole for no reason" is how he's going to make his mark between now and 2022.
And this really does seem to me to be a solid counterexample to the "Biden is using Manchin as a fig leaf to pursue his real goals" theory. (Which may well be legit in other contexts.)
There's no actual reason for anyone but Manchin to prefer the Manchin path here. It doesn't save money, create a better narrative, or target spending in any serious way. It's just a mechanism for Manchin to get a meaningless victory at the expense of Biden and the national party.
Read 4 tweets
1 Mar
So since @conor64 has QTed this in a weird way, let me say a bit more about it. My claim isn't—I think CLEARLY isn't—that McNeil "harmed" the teenagers in any way. It's that he was a poor choice of ambassador because he's not good at communicating with young people of their ilk.
I don't think McNeil's big sin in the Peru story is being evil. I think that his big sin is being an out-of-touch self-satisfied old doofus. And I say that as someone with out-of-touch self-satisfied old doofus tendencies myself.
When McNeil showed up in Peru quoting Tom Lehrer, making Jewish mother jokes, and saying "but what about blackface when BLACK people use it in AFRICA?", it was pretty much inevitable that he was going to come off as an annoying old weirdo.
Read 4 tweets
1 Mar
I would not have phrased this thread about Donald McNeil precisely as Mikki does, but ... yeah, basically, this.
Reading McNeil's posts, it does seem clear that he was pretty much fired, or at the very least that he quit in the face of a major, imminent, intentionally humiliating demotion.
But it's also really really clear that he should never have been assigned to that student trip to Peru, and that the fact that it blew up in his, and the Times', face was entirely foreseeable.
Read 7 tweets
28 Feb
Since Al Franken is trending again, let's remember that the allegations against him were multiple, varied, and serious, that he admitted to misconduct before resigning, and that even his coworkers andallies have described a longtime pattern of inappropriate behavior.
And if you're going to come into my mentions to argue that Al Franken was railroaded out of office in a way that should serve as a cautionary tale, please read this thread first. He gave his colleagues no basis on which to support him. FOR WEEKS.
I thought Franken was a really strong senator, by the way. I did my bit to help him get elected in his first campaign. And no, I don't think what he did was as bad as what Trump has done. And yet.
Read 8 tweets
24 Feb
This is an extremely strange denial from Governor Cuomo. It ignores most of Lindsey Boylan's allegations, contradicts a claim that she didn't make, and offers a rebuttal from four staffers without so much as asserting that they're in a position to make such a rebuttal reliably.
Boylan makes a series of allegations against Cuomo today, and the only one his office denies specifically isn't close to being the most serious. And again, that one denial is highly misleading. medium.com/@lindseyboylan…
Cuomo's office says, as if it's somehow damning, that Boylan was never alone with Cuomo, a press aide, and a state trooper on a October 2017 flight. But she doesn't say she was, just that on the flight in question "His press aide was to my right and a state trooper behind us."
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!