The “Big Lie” was based on lies about Dominion Voting. But unbeknownst to the public, it was another vendor’s security practices that had triggered an urgent & quiet EAC investigation 40 days before the election. The vendor? ES&S. by @jennycohn1/ whowhatwhy.org/2021/03/08/ele…
This is my new piece for @WhoWhatWhy. I want to thank their editors for working so hard on this with me. There were so many documents that it took three months to finish. I link to some of the most startling documents in the piece. 2/ whowhatwhy.org/2021/03/08/ele…
3/ “‘Under the current guidance from ES&S, an insider now knows specifically which file is not being inspected. It’s similar to a bank robber knowing that the camera covering teller #3 is broken.’” - internal email produced by Texas Secretary of State to @whowhatwhy 
4/ “It is the ultimate ‘fox watching the henhouse’ scenario. It is them [ES&S] self-certifying systems for use.” — internal email produced to me by the Texas Secretary of State.
😳Voting machine vendor ES&S has conducted its own hash testing, the crucial process for confirming a vendor has supplied its customer w/ certified software, as opposed to, for example, vote flipping software — a “Fox in the henhouse” scenario per one examiner. 5/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
