Labour's @RachelReevesMP has written an important strategic article in the @NewStatesman which I assume reflects frontbench thinking ... it has implications for the left that need to be decoded... newstatesman.com/politics/uk/20… 1/ Here goes... (thread).... 
2/ The Tories haven't just borrowed some Corbynist policies, they too have moved back from the individual to "community" as the basis for politics - so this is Base One of Labour's strategy: begs the question of how communities are defined and imagined...
3/ Very important attempt to differentiate from the Tories, English (and Scottish) nationalism, and ethnonationalist politics. But Labour needs to be a lot harder attacking the rising xenophobia that makes this argument necessary...
4/ Beat the pandemic and then set a new agenda, forcing the Tories to remain on ground where they can't win the argument (because Sunak has committed them to austerity post-2023, and indeed from October 2021)... but underplays the struggle over values Labour waged in 1945....
5/ Absolutely clear critique of neoliberal globalisation: begs question - will Labour commit to end the neoliberal economic model tout court... they don't want to have this argument in those terms but it has to be had...
6/ Critique of Blair/Brown's attachment to neoliberalism, but again begs the question: what's the alternative and how does this translate into a retail offer to voters who like the idea of their towns getting free money with the promise of more...
7/ Neat summary of Labour's target demographic - but under-estimates how easily the elderly conservative working class vote will get turned against even these heroes/heroines, which is the Tory strategy...
8/ Telling a convincing and coherent national story about the future is what all Labour leaders have failed to do since Blair (I'm no supporter of Blair!). You have to ask why? For me it's because the answer has to be radical economic change, which voters (as Corbyn found) fear
9/ This is the opportunity for the left. To define what "profoundly different" means. Just the same as it was for Nye Bevan and Stafford Cripps... that means fighting technocratic, cheese paring, PR-firm designed policymaking from the grass roots...
10/ If Labour could stop producing vague, prolix memes and reduce the offer to: well paid jobs, thriving communities and zero net carbon through smart deindustrialisation, as this does, it would stand a chance of cutting through: Tories cannot match the offer on high-paid work
11/ I agree with this. Mathematically there is no way to power without reconnecting with low-paid, lower skilled workers in English/North Wales towns (and Scotland). It carries the risk of alienating Labour's new core voters, in the urban salariat, but has to be done.... but how?
12/ Labour's problem is that narratives and visions are conveyed by actions, reactions and concrete policies, which have to be hammered home in brief, emotive language by everybody at once...
13/ By alienating, sidelining and sacking the left, Starmer has created a perfect conveyor belt for negativity into places like Bristol, Brighton, Stroud... this has to end.
14/ As I argued here, the left's job is to mobilise people in struggle, fight for a focused policy offer that ends neoliberalism, achieves real redistribution and ends net carbon emissions sooner than the elite wants to do it... medium.com/@paulmasonnews…
15/ The @RachelReevesMP article is an admirably clear statement of political strategy, raising opportunities for the left, but leaving the question of policy, slogans and practical struggles open... that's where the opportunity lies. newstatesman.com/politics/uk/20…
Sorry autocorrect: REindustrialisation!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
