Sorry George. Only just seen this. Thanks for the references to hypothesis papers. I don't disagree with Lavine et al’s model when she suggests "SARS-CoV-2 could join the ranks of mild, cold-causing endemic HCoVs in the long run”. Depends upon what is meant by the long run. (1)
Nor that vaccines could slow or accelerate this process depending upon the type of immunity they induce. I certainly agree with her that "These results reinforce the importance of behavioral containment during pandemic vaccine rollout”. (2)
I also agree with Veldhoen and Simas that the "question is whether the vaccines will be effective against reinfection or even eradicate SARS-CoV-2. Here, we suggest both answers are most probably no”. (3)
But later they suggest "most infected individuals will ultimately endure a largely asymptomatic or mild course of disease, although similarly to the other common cold HCoVs...new variants will unlikely differ sufficiently to escape established immunity.” (4)
So both hypothesis papers assume Sars-CoV2 will revert to a mild cold-like virus. This view is not shared by Aris Katzourakis author of the 'Prisoners of war' hypothesis about host adaptation and its constraints on virus evolution. rdcu.be/bcyDF (5)
His new thread: "The problem is, this model and sort of evolutionary process is not applicable to the kind of timescales that we are observing, but rather far longer time periods, with questionable relevant to implications for public health right now.”
Of course these are scientific areas outside my comfort zone. But your longer term issue of whether we should go for ‘annual’ vaccinations will depend absolutely on whether the virus becomes less virulent or not. (7)
For now can't we all agree we should suppressing this life-threatening infection down to the lowest possible level to prevent further deaths? And to isolate cases and their contacts as rapidly as possible as a key part of control? The current TTI system does not do that. (8)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My lengthy thread on test, trace and isolate in light of Sir Patrick Vallance’s comments and the Public Accounts Committee Report committees.parliament.uk/committee/127/… (1)
Yesterday, when asked about his assessment of TTI by Greg Clark, Sir Patrick Vallance said ” Test and trace is working very well at the moment” (March 9 Science Select Committee, 11.32am) (2) parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/36…
Sir Patrick agreed that “The isolate bit is very important (at all levels of cases)..TTI is more important as case numbers fall”. He also identified the importance of backward contact tracing i.e finding which contacts caused the case infection in order to identify clusters.(3)
There is a lot of nonsense about Zero Covid being an extreme position, only possible in repressive states (er..S Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Norway, Finland, NZ??) and our UK strategy reflects a more sensible centrist view. So compare the UK with successful countries...(1)
In fact we had a clear statement for proper public health control of the epidemic from WHO on Jan 29 2020, and the China Report from WHO on Feb 24 2020. All measures were not controversial and not based on rocket science or modelling. (2)
A new paper from Anhui province (pop 64 million, almost same as UK) in China shows how control was achieved without any severe or prolonged lockdown. sciencedirect.com/science/articl… (3)
Today we lost 1820 of our citizens. Many of these deaths could have been prevented. I plead with our Secretary of State @MattHancock and @CMO_England to make changes to our community protective shield as follows: (1)
Face the data with humility. Latest data show only 32% of in-person test results were received within 24 hours...Way too slow. For all routes combined, 18.3% of tests from all test sites were received within 24 hours of a test. (2)
Since Test and Trace launched, 97.8% of all contacts managed by local health protection teams have been successfully reached. Performance of call centres is much worse. The % reached within 24h of the case that reported them reaching the contact tracing system fell to 67.7%. (3)
SAGE Minutes Dec 22: "It is highly unlikely that measures with stringency + adherence in line with the measures in England in November (i.e. with schools open) wd be sufficient to maintain R below 1 in the presence of the new variant. R would be lower with schools closed"
SAGE Minutes Dec 22 "It is not known whether measures with similar stringency and adherence as Spring, with both primary and secondary schools closed, would be sufficient to bring R below 1 in the presence of the new variant." google.com/search?client=…
SAGE Minutes Dec 22 "ACTION: PHE to share information on new variant and South Africa variant with policymakers and ministers for consideration of action".
The PM says all frontline workers, people aged 70+ and people with serious underlying conditions will be vaccinated by mid-February. That’s 13 million, so 2 million per week. Potentially doable if GPs are supported with staff, volunteers funding and supplies. (1)
We must see a generous allowance funded by Treasury for isolation when infected or a contact. Without it, transmission will remain high increasing the risk of vaccine resistance. If not, could be the costliest mistake of the whole pandemic. (2)
Border screening must be made much tighter. Especially to identify new aggressive strains from other countries. (3)
Modellers believe that spreading out our limited supply of vaccine as single doses for 3 months will save up to 6000 lives. One concern though is whether single doses might lead to 'vaccine resistance' through virus mutation. (1)
If we assume that over the next 12 weeks 12-20 million people get one dose of a vaccine and are told or believe it gives 90% protection what % will actually go for a second jab? We might assume second dose coverage is at best 70%. (2)
That means between 4 and 6.7 million people might have fading protection. Will the risk of creating a vaccine resistant mutant in this group of people, which could spread rapidly to 7 billion people around the world, outweigh the benefits of 6000 deaths prevented. (3)